CWLoewJan 10th, 2007 - 19:53:07

A little publicity is flattering, but this goes well beyond 'Human Intrest', this is nothing short of stalking, merely because they take pictures for money?

There is a large difference between 'the public's right to know' and infringing on her rights of freedom from harassment, regardless of who she is or might be.

It appears that legislators are afraid to draw up new laws against invasion of privacy especially concerning the photo pirates, who have more rights than those they constantly harass.

Report this comment

vera vermaelenNov 10th, 2007 - 15:58:48

dear Kate,

Write about your lovelife with William and with the profit you invest in the children.

Tank you
Vera Vermaelen

Report this comment

vera vermaelenNov 13th, 2007 - 17:12:37

Kate where's your song about William for me?
Vera Vermaelen

Report this comment

vera vermaelenNov 14th, 2007 - 19:33:02

Let the truth come alive in real life!!!

with love Vera Vermaelen

Report this comment

ElisabethJul 6th, 2008 - 13:26:00

jla sent pas cette catherine middleton , na je crois pas que cela va durer

Report this comment

ElisabethJul 6th, 2008 - 13:31:20

I don't like kate middleton, she is a person very superficial and I don't understand why she is with william

Report this comment

Jane SmithAug 4th, 2008 - 07:50:59

I'm so sick of people being horrible and insulting to Kate Middleton! those people who, might i add, don't even know her and have no other interests other than insulting and constantly criticising a perfectly nice woman, really need to get a life. i'd like to see them in her shoes for a while, photographers following her everywhere and looking into every tiny detail of her past, and some of her so called 'friends' selling stories to newspapers for a quick buck! i don't think they'd like it one bit, maybe then they would stop being ignorant snobs.

Report this comment

sunday from carltonSep 24th, 2008 - 08:47:38

compared to autumn kelly, kate middleton is way, way ahead. autumn kelly looks jealous of kate middleton. autumn is very ordinary, very common and not one bit better than kate middleton.in looks, in wealth, in everything

Report this comment

elizabethwApr 24th, 2009 - 15:18:40

THAT WHY SHE ISN'T QUEEN MATERIAL AND I KNOW THE QUEEN GAVE HER DISAPPROVAL OF KATE FOR MARRIAGE AND MADE IT CLEARLLY UNDERSTOOD THAT SHE WOULD NEVER THE LUXURY OF ROYAL LIKE HIS MOTHER AS SO WAS TOLD SAID TOO camilla bowels BEFORE SHE MARRIED CHARLES AND TRUE TO THE WORDS OF THE QUEEN IT TAKES CHARLES TO PAY FOR CAMILLA CLOTHES. SHE ISN'T A ROYAL FAMILY MEMBER ESPECIALLY SINCE SHE HAS NO BLOOD LINES DIRECTLY TO CHARLES AND HIS FAMILY...IT TAKES MORE THAN HAVING A AUNT WHO HAD SEX WITH A KING AFTER ALL HIS HEIRS WERE BORN .WHICH MEANS camilla has not once oF blood royally on her veins not even CELINE DION LEANAGE RELATION AS SHE LIED ABOUT HAVING THAT .....AS WELL AS A GREAT GRANDMOTHER NEVER BEFORE A ROYAL MONARCH FROM HER CROUCH.THE KING SHE SUPPOSEDLY HAD SEX WITH HAD ALL HIS ROYAL HEIR BEFORE ,HIS RELATIONSHIP WITH camilla bowels GREAT GREAT GRAN .........NO BLOOD ROYAL CORSING THOUGHT HER VEINS

Report this comment

ELIZABETHWApr 24th, 2009 - 15:26:24

AS FOR ROYALLY TELLING THE PRESS ABOUT THIS ,THE QUEEN HAS ALWAYS KEPT IT TO HERSELF UNTIL SUCH A TIME WHEN SHE DEEMS IT NECESSARY TO REVEAL IT ,TO THE PUBLIC.. DUE TO SHE AND HER HUSBAND ARE REALLY THE STRONG BEARES OF SUPPORT FOR THE BOYS, ALTHOUGH THE BOYS NEED AS MUCH STILABLITY TO MANAGE THEIR FUTURE MAKING CORRECT DECISION FOR THEMSELVE AND CROWN ROYAL DUTIES..........

Report this comment

ELIZABETHWApr 24th, 2009 - 15:39:17

IT'S CONFUSING TO ME .. THE PRESS HAS SOO MUCH INFORMATION ON THE ROYALS , THE WHY DO THEY FORGET THAT HRH LADY DIANA WAS A COMMONER (WORKING MONARCHY): WITH NO ROYAL INCOME LIKE THAT OF HER FUTURE HUSBAND CHARLES..CHARLES HAD THE MONEY BUT NEEDED, DIANA WITH ALL HER PURE PURE ROAYL TIES WHICH WOULD GIVE CHARLES ROYAL TITLE UPLIFT AS WELL CONTINUE THE LEANAGE IN POWER.. NOT COMMANER(KATE MIDDLETON): WORKING CLASS CHILD, HER FAMILY DOES NOT HAVE FULL ROYAL TIES FOR INSTANT HER PARENTS LEANAGE DOES NOT HAVE ROAYLLY THOUGH OUT MEANING NO BREAK IN HER PAST PAST TO THE CROWN........FOR EXAMPLE MONACO DOES IT HAVE ULL BLOODED ROYAL FAMILY MEMBERS .....PRINCE ALBERT MOTHER WAS NOT BLUE BLOOD...HAD TO BE WITHOUT A BREAK FOR THEIR CONTINUE ON WITH THE CROWN ......HIS SISTERS AT ONE TIME MARRIED AND HAD PRE MARITAL SEX WHICH NEAHGATE THE HOPE OF PURITY BROUGHT IN THEIR UNIONS TO BEAR CROWN.....I BELIEVE DUE TO THE CLEAN UP

Report this comment