Note posts made on our older Talkback system will still show below. However, new posts can only be made via the new system (above). We will export the old comments to the new shortly. You can still comment as a guest on the new system but it also allows you to login using various social network and other accounts.
Other features coming soon.
Talkback
page: 1
Frank DJun 21st, 2007 - 18:14:45
The claims of this hacker are false, pure and simple.
of course it is fake. people who have copies will not give them away or distribute them. i legitimately have a copy of the real book but i would never give it to anybody while people with fake copies would.
I believe it's routine for a hacker to have poor English-language schools, to claim justification for their actions from one ethical leader or another (for instance you could have a go at the Creation Museum and claim, probably falsely, to be carrying out the wishes of Professor Richard Dawkins), and, very often, to make false claims. For that matter, attentive fans of the book may remember Nancy Stouffer, who lost a court case after claiming to have oridinated several of J. K. Rowling's ideas. Now, these books are of a type where knowing the outcomes greatly changes the experience of reading. Therefore, interested readers will avoid such information. However, I've now read the book - and the completed series doesn't fall flat on its face in the last lap - and I'm mildly curious to see what this person thought would be spoiler information. It's very likely to have been exposed as a hoax, if it was a hoax. Has anyone got the stuff? You could obscure it with ROT13.
USA
Your Talkback on this Story