Smallscreen Features
'Life on Mars' finale, a fan's reflection
By Tracey Brown Apr 2, 2009, 14:55 GMT

01/08/2009 - Jason O\'Mara - "Life On Mars" Filming at Floyd Bennett Field in Brooklyn on January 8, 2009 - Floyd Bennett Field - Brooklyn, NY, USA © Joseph Roberts / PR Photos
It is with mixed emotions that I watched the season and series finale of "Life on Mars" tonight.
It is a strange little show that I’ll be very sad to see go.
Mind you, I wasn’t smitten with "Life on Mars" at first sight. The pilot episode was a real problem, trying too hard to be clever and it had a case of the “too cutes” in trying to recreate the atmosphere of 70’s cop shows like "Starsky and Hutch."
It also seemed to be straining to adhere to the British show it is based on, but once the show started to go its own direction, it started to hit its stride and got better and better each week.
But what really made me stick with the show were the characters. I have to give full credit to the actors playing them with my staying with the show. There was an appealing quality about Jason O’Mara as Sam Tyler that made me care what happened to Sam, and to give the show another chance.
I also wanted to see Gretchen Mol as Annie Norris succeed in her struggle to be accepted as a “real cop”, instead of just the token “girl” in the station - more secretary than police officer.
But it was Michael Imperioli as the cynical, sexist and always inappropriate Detective Ray Carling that I thought stole the show and was my guilty favorite. With his horrible 70’s hairdo, mustache and bad attitude, he filled the role that Philip Glenister did as Gene Hunt in the UK series, as the oh-so-inappropriate guy with a good heart that you can’t help liking deep down.
Whereas in this version, Harvey Keitel’s Gene Hunt settled into the more kindly but stern father-figure after the first few episodes (which after the season finale, seems prescient.)
I am sure that I speak for all fans of the show, when I thank God that ABC actually got behind giving us a proper ending. What was also a pleasant surprise was that it was a totally different than the UK version, but was a logical, and now seemingly inevitable, ending to this version of the show.
When Sam wakes up, we find out that he and all the gang were actually astronauts on their way to Mars in 2035, who had been put in stasis for their 2 year trip to the red planet. Sam’s “reality” in 2008 was part of his “neural stimulation” program that was provided for the astronauts while in stasis. It was a glitch in the program that made him go further back to 1973 and make him think like he was losing his mind.
I found this a pretty ballsy approach when you consider that fans of the UK version are sure to complain about the producers and writers taking too literally the “Mars” reference in the title and will surely also complain that the ending was far too rosy and lacked some of the irony of the original.
Although this finale wasn’t without a few sly jokes, such as the references to another President Obama in 2035 (apparently Malia Obama) and the Wizard of Oz references, such as having the last thing "Gene Hunt" says to "Sam Tyler" in 1973, "I think I’ll miss you most of all, Scarecrow!"
I admire the producers and writers for taking this risk, as it would have been so much easier to copy the ending in the original series. Instead, fans of the US version were treated to this totally original and more traditionally sci-fi type ending, that may not please fans of the original show, but was the perfect conclusion to this version.
COMMENT
blog comments powered by DisqusLatest Headlines in Smallscreen
- 1. HLN’S Evening Express programming for week of June 4
- 2. FX's 'Anger Management' latest preview, 'Confessional' (VIDEO)
- 3. Oprah’s Book Club 2.0 launches Monday, details (VIDEO)
- 4. TV Land's 'Happily Divorced' finale with Ralph Macchio (VIDEO)
- 5. 'Hell's Kitchen' back for season 10, Ramsay still hot under collar (VIDEO)
Older Talkback
page: 1
Apparently the writer's are claiming that this was the idea that they had for the ending from the get go, and now that I think back, some of the clues throughout the show seem to indicate that is true. I'll have to re-watch them though to be sure!
I totally agree with you, and must say you put it all in the best possible light.
Thanks for that summary & opinion.
P.S. I too am a die hard fan of the Original, but Love the Love the US version as well, and I wasn't sure that I would.
I was disappointed to see the show's series finale, It has a lot of talented actors. I enjoyed the series greatly. Thankyou for its short lived life.
reflexions: UK, 'go to where you can feel and if you don't feel run', and US 'make home where you are' be happy and feel where you are. feelings like love hate fear, are stronger in mind than in reality. I saw both.liked the us finale more.
page: 1



ACApr 2nd, 2009 - 20:09:00
Reading this, I can understand where the person writing this is coming from, but I just want to give the other side of the argument.
The ending of the US version felt like a slap in the face. Did I want it to end the same way as the original? No. I wanted the US version to take a stand and make it's own ending. To me, while the US version didn't quite reach the same standards as the UK version, it succeeded in being its own television show, it's own identity. The show had proved that it *could* be more than just a cheesy rip-off of a popular and successful British show or a trying-to-be-deep-but-not-quite-that-deep generic sci-fi show. To have the show end the same way a generic sci-fi show would more or less makes everything US!Life on Mars had succeeded in doing void. It felt very much like a quick we-got-cancelled-and-we-don't-have anything ending, that the writers didn't even care about what they were writing. Worse, it felt like the writers didn't care about the viewers who stuck through the cheesiness, the awkward lines, the bad hair, to get to this last episode, expecting a good finale and getting, in my opinion, something below the standards the show had created for itself.
And that's my two pence.
Report this comment