Supreme Court backs Navy in sonar training dispute

brahmanNov 12th, 2008 - 17:49:23

Disgusting but not unexpected from the current retards on the supreme court.

Report this comment

hairgalNov 12th, 2008 - 18:31:24

I'm no scientist, naval minion, or court justice yet even I know this decision is very wrong no matter how many precautions the navy will implement to protect sea dwellers. Sound in water creates vibrations, cause and effect, of which will only be denied in the future for every whale that beaches itself, the lessening of pods, malnurished calves, or disappearing reef life. Get real, since 1970 we have faced the threat of environmental demise and little has been done to prevent that, as we see today. For shame on this decision!

Report this comment

Louis FortinNov 12th, 2008 - 19:46:17

For years the facts about the influence of Very LOW frequency Waves in the oceans on sea mamals have been known .Beached whales (lost whales leaders),they die and who cares,i do not know because i dont know anyboby who knows about this stuff.The media is working on other things and do not represent the whales in any way .When they will be gone the media wont matter in anyway , It will be to late for all of us earthly humans and every animals thrusted on us by god .Mercy on us for our sins of omission.Subs never did any good to anybody anyway ,prove me wrong if you can ,propaganda (security)experts.Ignorance is the mother of all sins and we will all pay for it in some way . Louis, Whale enthusiast in despair.

Report this comment

Hugh M.Nov 13th, 2008 - 10:53:12

How we treat our fellow animals is indicative of how we treat our fellow humans. Need to ignore the needs and health of the poor and powerless to accomplish some military or political goal? No problem.

Report this comment

SP4: finallyNov 16th, 2008 - 01:58:35

...at least there are five individuals who refuse to bow to unfounded pseudoscience. There is hope yet, for the world.

Report this comment