Nature Features

Preview: Scientists predict dire societal results of global warming

By Chris Cermak Mar 28, 2007, 7:01 GMT

Washington - When a UN-backed panel releases section two of a global climate report next week, one thing will be certain: scientists have grown increasingly confident of global warming's dire impact on human life.

The latest instalment - the second of three by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC,) to be released April 6 in Brussels - examines the expected impact of climate change on human society. It follows the first instalment released February in Paris, which focussed on the scientific evidence of global warming itself.

Some of the April report's expected predictions: coastal and low- lying regions will be flooded by rising sea levels, driving millions inland; higher global temperatures will lead to changing crop yields, increasing famine and disease; more heat-waves and stronger storms will lead to more deaths; and changing ecosystems mean countless animal and plant species will become extinct.

'Many of us believe we are on the threshold of a massive extinction event,' says Jeff Price of California State University at Chico, and a lead author of the IPCC report's chapter on ecosystems.

All of those findings are already known, through the reams of scientific research published in the six years since the IPCC's last series of reports. The job of the more than 2,000 scientists aiding the panel is to sift through those findings rather than conduct any new research.

What singles out this report, scientists say, is the consensus found within the worldwide literature. That consensus is not only stronger since the last round of IPCC reports in 2001, but it has spread to new areas.

Virginia Burkett, of the US Geological Survey's National Wetlands Research Centre, said there was a 'plethora of new information' and literature to sift through, yet she doesn't remember any 'major debates' her group had about its findings.

'The recent advances ... in the literature have allowed the consensus to include a much broader range of drivers and impacts,' said Burkett, who co-authored a chapter dealing with global warming's effect on coastal regions, in both the April report and in 2001.

The 2007 IPCC report series has also allowed scientists to use the huge range of models that have come out since 2001 and set specific timeframes for events.

'We have for the first time started putting bounds, temperature limits on when things will start happening,' Price said.

Though Price would not discuss specific findings ahead of the April release, he said it was generally agreed that just a 2-degree- Celsius hike in global temperature would lead to a 'serious conversion of habitats,' while anything above 2 degrees Celsius could result in 'major ecosystems' collapses.'

The IPCC report's first section already set an ominous tone. The panel found an 'unequivocal' trend of rising global temperatures and sea levels and placed the blame squarely on man-made emissions.

It predicted the Earth would heat up between 1.8 and 4 degrees Celsius by the end of this century, and up to 6.4 degrees Celsius at the poles, which heat up twice as fast as around the equator. Melting ice has led sea levels to climb 17 centimetres in the 20th century, and at a rate of 3.1 millimetres per year since 1993.

Another ominous finding of the upcoming April report is that it may already be too late to prevent some of global warming's impacts - humans can only adapt to so much, especially when it comes to rising sea levels flooding islands.

'There are some cases that may be beyond the limits of adaptability,' according to Roger Pulwarty of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA,) a co-author of a chapter on how humans have, and can, deal with the effects of climate change.

On a positive note, Pulwarty said his group also found that many effects of global warming can still be accommodated, but only if preparations for 'long-term' environmental changes start immediately.

That kind of warning, scientists hope, will push governments and people into action.

The February IPCC instalment's findings were welcomed by governments around the world and led the European Union to announce stiff new curbs on greenhouse-gas emissions and fresh efforts to find renewable energy alternatives. In the United States, the world's largest polluter, businesses and states are piling pressure on the federal government to place mandatory, nationwide caps on emissions.

'I hope it will finally wake people up to the sheer magnitude if the problem,' Price said.

But while the April report will offer recommendations on how already-occurring effects of climate change can be dealt with, many governments are likely to wait until the IPCC's third section is released in Bangkok in May, offering specific advice on how policy makers can reduce global warming.

A final draft of the second instalment will be discussed and voted on by government officials and scientists at a summit meeting starting April 2 in Brussels. The final work will be presented at a news conference on April 6.

© 2007 dpa - Deutsche Presse-Agentur


COMMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus

Latest Headlines in Nature

Older Talkback

page: 1 

SP4: not buying itMar 28th, 2007 - 15:52:27

Regardless of the cause, this thing could be good for everyone. It is global in scope (maybe?) and a thing like this might be just the thing to pull humanity together in ways never before seen. Wouldn't that be something?

Why would this be so bad?

Report this comment

williamMar 29th, 2007 - 09:10:05

The problem with getting humanity to act together is that one of the worst polluters and creator of many of the problems is America, which continues to have an extremely poor record at co-operating with other countries to combat the causes of global warming. Until there is action to force the energy guzzling/pollution producing population of america to modify their grossly selfish lifestyle (California being an honourable exception, following recent legislation) there is little likelihood that the rest of the world will be convinced of america's willingness to change and co-operate

Report this comment

SP4: William, wake upMar 29th, 2007 - 14:56:45

The biggest threat to California is soot from China, and water pollution from mexico, not pollution from the USA. I do not know where you live, but take a look at air cleanliness all over the world and the USA is up front with the major, industrialized nations. America pioneered environmental law, while China and Europe followed.

Report this comment

williamMar 29th, 2007 - 15:44:34

Head in the ground time again I see! America produces 25% of the world's pollutants from 6% of the world population - these are well established facts. You may try and pick a particular item such as soot (and anyway there are rather more Chinese than Yanks, so the amount per chinese person is extremely low) but you can't escape the overall pollution you are producing with your grossly wasteful lifestyle

Report this comment

PeteMar 29th, 2007 - 17:40:05

Typical american self interested comment - California affected by soot from China not USA pollution - but no thought about other countries affected by american pollution
These americans really are a cancer on the good health of the world

Report this comment

SP4: That's because...Apr 1st, 2007 - 01:45:58

We have led the world in pollution standards. Our coal facilities are some of the best in the world. Our auto standards are some of the toughest in the world. Do we pollute more? Sure, our economy is the largest. Only luddite enviornazi's measure it per capita. Sure, china is low, because they keep their people living far below humane standards.

Go to the sources and compare to the USA. We pioneered Nuke power, wind power, and clean coal power. Then go look at other countries plants.

Report this comment

johnApr 2nd, 2007 - 10:17:28

But not the largest economy for much longer - as shown by the decline in the dollar, unwillingness of people to travel to america so tourism revenue will drop, and soon to be overtaken by idia, china and russia. Good luck as you 'live cleanly, and watch the temperatures and waters rise

Report this comment

ianApr 2nd, 2007 - 13:57:37

come on SP4 - you may innovate new things occasionaly but look how you drag your feet about signing up to world action - Kyoto, current EU initiatives etc. You population is too busy guzzling the world's enery to actually do anything constructive to help the rest of the world

Report this comment

page: 1 

Follow Us

Follow M&C on Pinterest

Search

Custom Search

Sites We Like

NASA
New Scientist

Also Check Out

Justin Bieber can't move eyebrow after concussion

Justin Bieber cant move eyebrow after concussion
Justin Bieber can't move his eyebrow after running into a glass wall on Thursday (31.05.12) and suffering a concussion. ... more

Pamela Anderson wants to move back to Canada

Pamela Anderson wants to move back to Canada
Pamela Anderson wants to move back to Canada, because she feels like she is 'playing a character' when she is in Los Angeles. ... more

Queen Elizabeth excited about concert

Queen Elizabeth excited about concert
Britain's Queen Elizabeth can't wait for the Diamond Jubilee Concert on Monday (04.06.12), says event organiser Gary Barlow. ... more

Usher: I'm a genius

Usher: Im a genius
Usher has a strong sense of self-belief and believes everything he does is 'genius'. ... more

Jake Shears received death threat

Jake Shears received death threat
Scissor Sisters singer Jake Shears had his security boosted after a death threat against him was intercepted by his management team. ... more

One Direction gain police protect in Canada

One Direction gain police protect in Canada
' X Factor' 2010 rejects have stuck to their word and bulked up on security. ... more

Susan Boyle has emotional motorway breakdown

Susan Boyle has emotional motorway breakdown
'Britain's Got Talent' reject was screaming and crying. ... more

Russell Brand: Tom Cruise is a joy to be around

Russell Brand: Tom Cruise is a joy to be around
'Rock Of Ages' actor says his co-star cooked him a birthday dinner. ... more

Kate Moss dog ruining home

Kate Moss dog ruining home
Supermodel's puppy hasn't been trained yet and is urinating around their home as well as destroying furniture. ... more

David Beckham would love to move back to UK

David Beckham would love to move back to UK
Soccer star and wife Victoria Beckham are tempted to go back all the time. ... more