Camilla embarrassed by raunchy dance

NicholasMay 1st, 2009 - 12:32:47

There are statues and paintings at Windsor of nude or partially nude women. Why is it 'art' when it's in paint or marble, and 'offensive' when it's flesh and blood? Nothing wrong with good old traditional German Belly Dancing!:)

Report this comment

Mary EllenMay 2nd, 2009 - 01:39:49

... And I suppose you'd find it perfectly natural to find a couple having sex in broad daylight in the open lawn at Windsor - in front of a live audience? Perhaps you'd rather watch a couple having sex while sitting next to you on the bus? All sex is natural - but... it's meant for the privacy of a bedchamber, thank you. And I certainly don't want my children being exposed to it at a young age. And though the 'art work' being displayed at Windsor is done by talented artists, I believe it is just pornography made acceptable due to its age. Will the current day playboy centerfolds become acceptable as fine works of photography in 200 years? I hope not. But even if they were, I would still not display any such indecencies in my home, or expose my kids to them. The sexual aspects of a human body are meant to please the person's spouse, and not the general public. It is beautiful simply because it an expression of a person's inmost private self to his/her closest and most intimate soulmate, and it is not to be exposed to gratify 'group' sexual desire - which is the equivalent of spiritual rape.

Report this comment

maps tuttleMay 2nd, 2009 - 07:53:35

... and though your face, (with various orifices) which may cause another to be attracted to you (in ways you may not like) isn't as sexual as your breasts, butt, or groin? You think 6.7 billion of us is an accident? If so, then you question the very design of your existence. Rather presumptuous, methinks.

And while a face may be important for the practical acts of communication and nutrition, so also are breasts, legs, butts, groins, etc. to their various functions.

I treasure discretion, but realize that it is purely something taught and practical, rather than spiritual or self-evident. If I flash money in a public context, I risk robbery - and thus if I flash firm breasts and butt, you think it would be treated otherwise to those that might want these?

Dress is a form of self-defense from the minimal but ever-present uncivilized drivel that permeates all humanity. To undress is to tease and tempt, but it is hardly a crime.

puritan moron

Report this comment

Edgar Allen PoeMay 4th, 2009 - 12:08:34

Your haiku-ish 'Puritan Moron' summation was the coup-de-gras.

Of course, all judgments are equally as worthless, including yours.

Selah.

Report this comment

DawnMay 4th, 2009 - 20:20:03

She's the biggest TART in all of Great Britian. She has no reason to embarrassed about the dancers. She should be embarassed by her own behavior with a married man.

Report this comment

carole MayMay 21st, 2009 - 18:57:58

Well said Dawn. What a joke she is.

Report this comment