Prince Charles' herbal remedies

James PannozziDec 17th, 2008 - 14:51:03

It is to Prince Charles' credit that he has had the courage to promulgate the idea that good cures can be had from natural things and from the incredibly powerful principles of Homeopathy. Incessant innuendo against Homeopathy has been ongoing in the British Press, despite research confirmations by researchers such as Ennis and St. Laudy that highly dilute solutions do stimulate biological activity, even when no atoms of the stimulant remain. Some opponents found it necesssary to send a letter against Homeopathy using a logo of the NHS which they had no right to use
and a branch of the NHS issued an immediate disavowal.

In its 'end' (sic) of Homeopathy issue in 2005, carefully timed to negate Charles' excellent speech before the WHO in favour of alternative medicine, the British journal Lancet published a rather shabby 'meta' analysis of Homeopathic research, wrongly concluding that Homeopathy was no better than placebo. The article came under immediate criticism, even from anti-homeopathists, and recently was convincingly and completely refuted in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.

It has long been my belief that for any known malady, even fatal disease, there exists some root, leaf, branch or other natural product somewhere on this earth that can cure it.

As part of a rational integrated health care system in which no one system of medicine predominates, complementary and alternative medicine is destined to play a great role and we are grateful to Prince Charles for his active support in this cause. The evidence is there for all to see, in the cured people, relief from chornic conditions and natural activation of the body's own systems free from the 'side' effects and other deleterious consequences of the bad side of modern medicine.

Report this comment