People

PETA be damned, Naomi Campbell set to star in fur ads

People News

By April MacIntyre Jul 6, 2009, 14:42 GMT


Your Talkback on this Story

Note posts made on our older Talkback system will still show below. However, new posts can only be made via the new system (above). We will export the old comments to the new shortly. You can still comment as a guest on the new system but it also allows you to login using various social network and other accounts.

Other features coming soon.

Talkback

page: 1 

CelesteJul 6th, 2009 - 15:43:53

This woman Naomi Campbell may be beautiful on the outside but inside she is very very ugly. In the past she was part of an anti-fur campaign but obviously for her it was only skin deep! Money rules and her compassion for anybody but herself is obvious. Fur only looks good on the true owner: the poor animal that was abused and tortured for a stupid coat!

Report this comment

AgreeJul 6th, 2009 - 15:45:34

Obviously it's all about the money!

Report this comment

ModelizerJul 6th, 2009 - 19:56:50

Hello People, she is a Model and a Model's job is to promote whatever product there're suppose to promote in this instance its Fur.
Linda, Christy, and a slew of other High Profiled Models have done fur ads and nobody questioned or ridiculed but when naomi inks a deal for a large sum of money to Model, then its a problem. Please get a grip and stop slandering Naomi for things that you all have nothing to do with!

Report this comment

PeopleJul 7th, 2009 - 00:48:38

She has brought all the negative feelings about her on herself with her disgusting actions......EOS

Report this comment

NikaJul 7th, 2009 - 09:33:49

I think it is great Naomi will be promoting fur in an upcoming fall ad campaign. Fur has always been and will always be an important part of fashion and I’m glad to hear that one of the most beautiful supermodels decided to promote it. Fur is not only beautiful but it is also one of the most sustainable fabrics. And the warmest one as well. Go Naomi! Nika, www.nikapika.com

Report this comment

Peta-SucksdotcomJul 8th, 2009 - 17:25:28

It is okay to disagree with Peta.

They are a fund raising group whose main purpose is fund raising. While Peta brings in 30 million a year in donations they are unable to save the lives of the animals left in their care. They kill (in 2008) 97% of the animals left in their care while the greatly underfunded shelter down the street is able to adopt out 80% of the animals left in their care.

peta sucks


All they want is your sympathy because that leads to your wallet.

Report this comment

page: 1 

Latest Headlines in People

Bookmark and Share Share

From Sites We Like

Latest PopEater News

Taylor Swift Mocks Kate Gosselin, Kanye and Joe Jonas on 'SNL'
Lamar Wants Khloe Kardashian Pregnant
PopEater Poll Results: How You Voted on Rihanna, Mariah, Anderson and Taylor
Ten Celebrities Who Need To Join Twitter
Usher's Marriage to Tameka Foster Officially Over

Latest Cinema Blend News

Joe Johnston Talks Jurassic Park 4
Gwyneth Paltrow Stands By Her Man: Nicole Kidman
Eminem Returns To The Big Screen In Shady Tales
The Killer Inside Me Trailer: Casey Affleck Has Issues
First Twilight Eclipse Teaser Poster

Latest Tech Herald News

Review: Motorola Droid
Facebook settlement means little in the long run
Naked Windows 7 vulnerable to Malware if left in default state
Adobe patches Shockwave Player
SSL flaw allows man-in-the-middle attacks
USA