mikeApr 5th, 2009 - 12:42:53

so let me get this right > Tom said about Valkyrie that he grew up wanting to kill Hitler > Tom said about Days of Thunder that he grew up wanting to drive fast cars > Tom says about this movie that he grew up wanting to make this movie

Whats next Tom > Superman - oh ! scientology ( homo novis )

Report this comment

SteveApr 5th, 2009 - 17:21:49

I think it would be a great fit having those two in those roles, but they have big shoes to fill; the original movie was a gem! Tom usually makes sure everything in his movies are top notch so I am sure it will be great as well.

Perhaps John's wife Kelly Preston could play his love interest....she still looks great, even well in to her 40's!

Report this comment

parentApr 6th, 2009 - 21:57:16

A big question in all this is: Should Merrill Lynch and Bank of America be engaged in Hollywood movie making after receiving taxpayer money in the form of the TARP?

If Merrill Lynch's half-billion dollar contract with MGM/UA/Tom Cruise cannot be broken--like the AIG bonuses--then shouldn't movie executive compensation be set to no more than $250,000 per year? And, if such movie executives make more than that, they should be taxed at the 90% tax rate that the House of Representatives passed concerning people getting the AIG bonuses.

This movie financing with taxpayer money should be a matter of taxpayer and congressional outrage! It is putting government money at too much risk; especially after the 'Valkyrie' and 'Lions to Lambs' failures.

Let your congressman and senators know how you feel.

Report this comment