RobbieJan 20th, 2008 - 01:04:03

It's nice that John has plans for whom he will have sex with post-Scott, but I find it totally tacky that he has to tak about it. Is this somethng we should care about??

The list just grows longer with words that describe John in every glowing way possible, but I have to disagree with John's own comment that is a more macho gay man. I, for one, do not find John to be macho at all. Of course I'm basing my opinion on what I've read about him and what I've seen in his videos. My definition of macho must be different from his. He's allowed to be who he is in his own mind, of course.

If this message is any misspellings or is missing anything in the right margin, it may be because I cannot see the right margin or remove what is getting in the way. Very sorry....

Report this comment

DanielleFeb 14th, 2008 - 04:27:40

I thinks its right for John to stand up for what he believes in, there is no sterio typical human so why do people thinks it is okay, to refer to people of different sexual opentation in that manner and to sterio type them.

John has a masculin 'air' in my opinion some will not agree with me and i except that but he isnt a skinny man he looks we musseled, his tall, his hairs a tad to short as Captain Jack, but in live his the sort of persion everone should be friends with cause he is always having a laugh.

Report this comment