People

Phil Spector benefits from bad L.A. jurors

People News

By Stone Martindale Sep 28, 2007, 14:52 GMT


Phil Spector - View Phil Spector Pictures - Phil Spector News


Your Talkback on this Story

Note posts made on our older Talkback system will still show below. However, new posts can only be made via the new system (above). We will export the old comments to the new shortly. You can still comment as a guest on the new system but it also allows you to login using various social network and other accounts.

Other features coming soon.

Talkback

page: 1 

Mady Maguire J.D.Sep 28th, 2007 - 18:35:55


If I Had Done It

If I had five months to defend Phil Spector (and all the money it takes to make our team happy), then no matter how famous/infamous the defendant; repulsive the crime or open & shut the evidence—I’ll bet I could get reasonable doubt from at least one juror. One is all you need. You don’t need two, but the one needs another one to make it look like he is not the only irrational one. The odds that I will get at least one juror go up exponentially if during voir dire, I focus on selecting the one juror having the most affinity with the defendant and the business sense to understand that there will be no opportunity for media deals unless the celebrity defendant is found not guilty.

If I was the Los Angeles prosecutor I would eschew the opportunity to grandstand for five months and get that show on and off the road ASAP. For example, I would point out to the Spector/Clarkson jury, in my relatively brief closing argument, that although the defense bombarded them for months with oodles of the most expensive expert scientific evidence that money can buy; they must consider only one thing to refute the defense theory that Lana Clarkson killed herself. The gun that killed Lana Clarkson bore no fingerprints—only the victim could not have wiped them off.

If I was Lana Clarkson’s family I would file a wrongful death civil suit ASAP—before the next dream team or Spector’s mouth candy wife gets what’s left of his money and memorabilia. The defense has no shot for a summary judgment—since the plaintiff has a prima facie case based on res ipsa loquitur.

Report this comment

those 2 jurors.........Sep 28th, 2007 - 20:56:16

pray hope nothing like this will ever touch them, then they will feel the betrayal, he killed a woman in cold blood and you people let him walk! What the heck...

Report this comment

page: 1 

Similar articles

Phil Spector Trial: Mistrial and wasted time and tax dollars
Phil Spector's gun instructions
Phil Spector's jury deadlock
Phil Spector Trial, Hung Jury?
Phil Spector Trial: Jury retires

Latest Headlines in People

Bookmark and Share Share

From Sites We Like

Latest PopEater News

Taylor Swift Mocks Kate Gosselin, Kanye and Joe Jonas on 'SNL'
Susan Boyle Coming to 'Dancing With The Stars'
Ten Celebrities Who Need To Join Twitter
Lamar Wants Khloe Kardashian Pregnant
PopEater Poll Results: How You Voted on Rihanna, Mariah, Anderson and Taylor

Latest Cinema Blend News

Joe Johnston Talks Jurassic Park 4
Gwyneth Paltrow Stands By Her Man: Nicole Kidman
Eminem Returns To The Big Screen In Shady Tales
The Killer Inside Me Trailer: Casey Affleck Has Issues
First Twilight Eclipse Teaser Poster

Latest Tech Herald News

Review: Motorola Droid
Facebook settlement means little in the long run
Naked Windows 7 vulnerable to Malware if left in default state
Adobe patches Shockwave Player
SSL flaw allows man-in-the-middle attacks
USA