JoeMay 5th, 2008 - 17:07:50

There is a blatant double standard when it comes to the showing of male genitalia versus female genitalia. Look at how many penises have been in mainstream movies, R rated, then compare that figure to the number of visible vulvas/vaginas (not pubic hair!). Clearly skewed. I can bet any movie you name (besides Dreamers, NC17, Caligula, NR, Knocked Up, fake vagina occluded by child) fails to show a vagina! I'm sure you don't believe me, look for yourself. If you agree with me, help fight this double standard! groups.yahoo.com/group/Fight_the_MPAA/ While McGregor's stunt of nude proportions had a slight artistic taste to it, it was also taken a bit too far.

Report this comment

GabrielJul 16th, 2008 - 05:30:33

As an straight guy I'm tired of the enaquality of showing male genitalia in most mainstream movies nowdays, while close-ups of penises are allowed by the MPAA, vaginas are totally forbidden in these movies, female nudity is decreasing enormously while male nudity is increasing and beiin esplicit and acceptable even in PG13 movies. There's no PG13 movies with female nudity, but there is a lot of shots of bare naked male butts and esplicit male jokes. Why does the MPAA allowed male nudity while forbiddens full female nudity ?. The vagina is the only human part that is considered pornographyc, Why ?. To end this, if you are an straight male 'do not spend your money in Jude Apatow movies', he is the one that is encouraging and producing movies showing male genitalia, saying that America fears the Penis. This is of course so absurd, just wacth any shows on TV or movies, there's always references about male genitalia, but female genitalia is even restricted in these shows, if the word vagina is mention on TV it gets an automatically PG14 or TVMA, so waht america fears is not the penis but the 'VAGINA'.
DO NOT SPEND YOUR MONEY IN JUDE APATOWS MOVIES.

Report this comment