James Brown's common law wife locked out
People News
By Stone Martindale Dec 26, 2006, 15:50 GMT
View James Brown Pictures - James Brown News
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Headlines in People
- 1. David Spade has got it going on
- 2. In photos: 'Hayden Panettiere launches her new fashion clutch bag'
- 3. In photos: 'Wonder Woman Day at Golden Apple Comics'
- 4. David Duchovny drops lawsuit
- 5. In photos: '2008 Comedy Festival Presented by TBS'
Talkback
Add your comment (no registration required)
I do not understand why James Brown's common law wife is kept out of the home they shared with their son. It sounds that Mr. Brown's family are so jealous and afraid that his youngest son will get more than thay do, which I feel would be the right thing to be done. His other children are older and unless they are really hurting that bad for money should see that the youngest of Mr. Brown's children and his mother that is their half brother whether they like it or not.
My family always believes that if a sibling is born in the family even if it is born out of wed lock that child is family even if some some of the family do not believe in having a child out of wedlock. Do not let that keep the other family members from treating him or even his mother as if they do not belong. Quit being so jealous and act like a family even though his children are from other marraiges. Just try and get along. The attorney really needs to try and draw everyone together instead of having them fighting among each other.
In Australia the term de facto marriage is often used to refer to relationships between men and women who are not married but are effectively living as husband and wife for a period of time, however common-law marriage is sometimes heard. The Federal parliament has power to legislate for marriages, which it first did in 1959 with the Matrimonial Causes Act (covering divorces, etc.) and in 1961 with the Marriage Act, both of which are now replaced by the 1975 Family Law Act. The Federal parliament has no power over de-facto marriages, and thus all Australian states and territories have legislation covering aspects of de-facto marriages, such as property distribution, custody of children, etc. if a relationship ends. Most laws dealing with taxation, social welfare, pensions, etc. treat de-facto marriages in the same manner as solemnized marriages.
'www.reference.com'
So if she either got kicked out of the house or she left on her own, she might be considered common law divorced.
I hate to say 'I Told You So' but...
When you marry one man, while still married to another I'm afraid you SOL.
Yes her child has a stake in the family fortune, but perhaps not Tammi.
Always the backup singer, never the headliner.
Boo-Hoo. Another Scammer bites the dust!
Tammie Hyne or whatever her name is shouldn't get a dime! She's tramp & a bigamist!
She wasn't his 'common-law' wife. She was married to someone else! Anyway, the validity of common-law marriages vary from state to state. I'd bet that James Brown's lawyers know what they are doing in not recognizing the so-called marriage. I wonder if criminal charges could be brought against her? They busted that polygamist in Utah for having multiple wives, why not this gold-digger for trying to have 2 husbands?
I feel no pity for her. She decided to lay with a black narcotic addict, so her misery is well-deserved.
Some states do not recognize 'common law' marriages. Many women who have lived with a man for great numbers of years have found if their state did not recognize a common law marriage, or had requirements to determine that status, have been left out of the legal process... they all need to check their status before going into this relationship.
blame bush .
Tammi RaeDec 26th, 2006 - 17:27:34
Now where did I put those damn keys?
Report this comment