Judith Regan vows war
People News
By Stone Martindale Dec 18, 2006, 16:13 GMT
Older Talkback
I never thought he did it like many who watched every word of the trial. I was looking forward to reading the book. Will it ever be published?
I would like to suggest to OJ that he bring civil suit against the LA police department for all of their missteps and abuse of power and that he present it as a class action case so that others who have experienced the 'missteps and abuse' can also step forward and declare their case....
Good Luck Oj, I know reasonable doubt.
Eileen Frances LMT
Spoikane, Wa. 99223
This 'writer' of this piece should be fired being barely literate. Or sent back to learn basic grammar and sentence structure.
Last week Iran held a 'deny the holocost' gathering. Maybe next week they could do an 'O.J. didn't do it' event.
I know O.J. did it and to torment the families even further by 'supposedly speculating' on how he would have done it is sinking to a another low of his. He is a true narcisistic psychopath that will stoop to anything to keep attention on himself, even if it's so grotesque as reliving a murder he committed. For Ms. Regan shame on her. We all have to look within to decide what will we sell our souls for. She obviously felt she could justify this type of behavior. I hope it was worth it.
The only reasonable doubt in that case was that the juror's brains were in doubt...
OJ Sucks.
Jane Friedman is not HarperCollins's attorney. She is the CEO of HarperCollins.
Eileen Frances is a total moron.
I agree Joe. Anyone with a a modicom of intelligence (look it up Eileen and Molly)knows that OJ is guilty and to even suggest that he file any type of suit against the LAPD is ludicrous.
I won't call Judith Regan a greedy, money-grubbing whore, but she'll certainly do until one comes along.
Eileen Frances and everyone else that thinks OJ is innocent are morons. He killed two people and now he wants to profit from it. Oj and Regan will burn in hell.
Molly, you say that you never thought he did it, yet you were looking forward to reading a book about how he might have done it. That is as conflicted and ignorant as your belief OJ is innocent.
Simpson is as guilty as he is arrogant. He should be shunned and excommunicated from all forms of society and I am glad there was an outcry against Judith Regan and this waste of ink called a book.
The battle of the pigs in the arena of dung. I hope it lasts for years, with Rancid Regan the winner and costs Putrid Murdoch and FOX billions.
To all that know that oj did it,were you a witness ,do you have some kind of info that was not presented at the trial? Do you have special powers to know this ? There was a long trial why were you not there giving your information !Its true he was convicted in the press before he went to trial,but he was found not guilty! Not guilty!I know you may have little faith in the justice system but the man was found not guilty.PLease dont convict thru the press.
I still find it hard to believe that anyone thinks that the OJ trial proved 'reasonable doubt' he was there, he had motive and intent, he had no alibi and all the physical evidence pointed to who, hmmm OJ, THEY GUY DID IT, THERE IS NO TOOTH FAIRY!!!
Who is OJ and Judith Regan and Jane Friedman? Should I care? Someone please tell me if I should care about all of these people. I hope not because I just started reading about Jen Aniston's latest break up and I havn't even finished that.
ROTFLMAO !! Judith Regan fired by a WOMAN !! Now She'll hate everyone, not just Men.
Judith Regan upgraded to a Steamer Trunk for the 'baggage' of 'ISSUES' She hauls around Her daily life.
To Paul (and the rest who think he was found innocent) I say this,
Do you not read any further than the headlines? He was found innocent in a bogged-down, media circus of a public trial on criminal charges by incompetent prosecutors. They are the ones that put 'reasonable doubt' on the table when they didn't fish out their own idiot cops mistakes. To be honest, it wasn't the jurors who were at fault. They followed the rules. They had to admit there was 'reasonable doubt'.... a fraction of it compared to the overwhelming evidence, but still.
If you want to see the actual evidence presented by equally armed and talented attorneys for both plaintiff and defendant, then look at the civil trial in which OJ WAS FOUND GUILTY!!!! YES GUILTY!! He owes millions for the wrongful death of his 2 victims but yet has not paid a penny of that... why? Because he knew he was guilty and had his lawyers hide away all his money in retirement funds that can't be touched.
He's guilty, found so in a court of law. But a civil suit, wrongful death conviction does not mean prison. So... thus walks a murderer. He just has to be sneaky in how he talks about it so he doesn't somehow incriminate himself back into a criminal trial.
America watched the trial Paul, we all set on the same jury. After the trial we all voted on OJ's guilt or innocence and the vast majority of us found him guilty. You either didn't tune in, idolized OJ or are in that small minority of people who can never make their mind up.
Similar articles
- Judith Regan: Which way, LA?
- Regan to initiate legal battle against News Corp.
- Judith Regan to publish controversial Mickey Mantle tell all
Latest Headlines in People
- 1. Muse's classical ambition
- 2. Minnie Driver's Xmas baby
- 3. Shakira gets broody
- 4. Ozzy Osbourne's Adrenalin Jack worry
- 5. Nervous return for Nicole Kidman
News from Other Sites
Your Talkback on this Story