People

In photos: 'USA J.K. Rowling Trial'

People Features

By M&C News Apr 15, 2008, 21:44 GMT


JK Rowling - View JK Rowling Pictures - JK Rowling News

Click to launch this JK Rowling gallery Click to launch this JK Rowling gallery Click to launch this JK Rowling gallery Click to launch this JK Rowling gallery Click to launch this JK Rowling gallery

Your Talkback on this Story

Note posts made on our older Talkback system will still show below. However, new posts can only be made via the new system (above). We will export the old comments to the new shortly. You can still comment as a guest on the new system but it also allows you to login using various social network and other accounts.

Other features coming soon.

Talkback

page: 1 

cwsApr 15th, 2008 - 23:20:50


A very interesting case I must say. I understand both sides of the argument very well and frankly will be intrigued by what is correct in the eye of the law.

Personally, I think that Ms Rowling is being a little over the top in her comments and testimony such as

'It's really decimated my creative work over the last month,' she said. 'Again, it's very hard to describe to someone who's not engaged in creative writing, but you lose the threads, you worry if you will be able to pick them up again in exactly the same way.'

What I find to be very interesting is that she was very supportive of Mr Van Ark and his website however once it was known that he was making a lexicon Ms Rowling attitude turned towards him 180 degrees and has been quoted as saying 'I believe that it is sloppy, lazy and that it takes my work wholesale, verbatim. This book constitutes wholesale theft of 17 years of my hard work.'

While Ms Rowlings views this as a money grab by Mr Vander Ark I see it more as a over enthusiastic supporter who had a good idea. My personal feelings are that she is in the wrong and that Mr. Vander Ark's Lexicon should be published and if Ms Rowlings thinks she can do a better job, they by all means put out an Official Encyclopedia or Lexicon.

Report this comment

It's her imaginative vision...Apr 16th, 2008 - 14:46:29

why should Van Arke or whatever his name be allowed to copy someone's hard work. Bloody greedy a..... the book should not be published.

Report this comment

maryApr 17th, 2008 - 01:57:22



It's Rowling's work. 20 years of labor. She has total rights to her labor.

I doubt if any writer would stand for what's been done to Rowling.

Report this comment

Fight like you never ......Apr 17th, 2008 - 19:50:35

fought in your life, he is shameless opting to publish someone else's work he's an Am..... for you, you do all the work they take the glory. Do not settle, if its not in your favor appeal, appeal, appeal until you run out of courts to appeal, do not give in.....

Report this comment

page: 1 

Latest Headlines in People

Bookmark and Share Share

From Sites We Like

Latest PopEater News

Taylor Swift Mocks Kate Gosselin, Kanye and Joe Jonas on 'SNL'
Susan Boyle Coming to 'Dancing With The Stars'
Ten Celebrities Who Need To Join Twitter
Lamar Wants Khloe Kardashian Pregnant
PopEater Poll Results: How You Voted on Rihanna, Mariah, Anderson and Taylor

Latest Cinema Blend News

Script Reaction: Duncan Jones And Jake Gyllenhaal's Source Code
Lawrence and Foxx Resurrect Sheneneh And Wanda
The Slammin' Salmon Trailer: Broken Lizard Serves Up Funny
Moon Director Brings Jake Gyllenhaal Source Code
Weekend Box Office - Christmas Comes Early... Again

Latest Tech Herald News

Shamed Brit cop busted for stealing videogames
RTFM: Jailbroken iPhones get iRickrolled due to weak SSH access
Review: Motorola Droid
Facebook settlement means little in the long run
Naked Windows 7 vulnerable to Malware if left in default state
USA