People

Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall - Royals


"Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall" (Camilla Rosemary; formerly Parker Bowles; née Shand, born 17 July 1947) is the second wife of Charles, Prince of Wales, heir apparent to the thrones of the United Kingdom and the other 15 Commonwealth Realms. ....more

Your Comments on Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall

Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall News

In Pictures: 'Prince Charles and Camilla Visit Canada'

Nov 5, 2009, 22:03 GMT

In Pictures: Prince Charles and Camilla Visit Canada
We have added a new set of pictures from the event 'Prince Charles and Camilla Visit Canada'. ... more

Expert bowler Camilla

May 12, 2009, 10:01 GMT

Britain's Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, has been praised for her bowling skills. ... more

In photos: 'Prince Charles Visits Ecuador'

Mar 17, 2009, 21:49 GMT

In photos: Prince Charles Visits Ecuador
We have added a new set of images from the event 'Prince Charles Visits Ecuador.' ... more

In photos: 'Britain's Prince Charles Visits Chile'

Mar 10, 2009, 22:12 GMT

In photos: Britains Prince Charles Visits Chile
We have added a new set of images from the event 'Britain's Prince Charles Visits Chile.' ... more

Camilla's flower show

Jul 8, 2008, 11:00 GMT

Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, visited the annual Hampton Court Palace Flower Show yesterday (07.07.08). ... more

Read more news about Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall

Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall Talkback

page: 1 

JoAnneJun 24th, 2007 - 00:40:31

Am I the only one who saw the news blurb on 21 June (Prince William's 25th Birthday) when Camilla was seen wearing a broach that had at one time been part of a necklass belonging to Diana? I have a roommate who is from England and I have been searching the web to find this information to show her. Is it out there or am I totally losing it?

Report this comment

DawnJul 30th, 2007 - 01:39:07

You are so right!!!!!!! I did see the neckless and Yes I think it's 'Diana's' Why in the World would the boys let there Mums stuff be taken from them usless 'Charles,doesn't think we know her stuff?' Write back to DawnIvie@msn.com

Report this comment

LuciSep 3rd, 2007 - 05:32:37

Di is dead. Live in the present.
We can take nothing from this world.
Let weare HRH Camilla that she wants.

Report this comment

lady annApr 8th, 2008 - 14:25:18

A lot of Diana jewls belonged to the crown and not Diana herself so even though we put them together with Diana who I loved. The truth of the matter is as the new wife of Charles, Camillia is intitled to wear them..
you would never see her wearing personal items of Diana's how ever found the princes have grown of there new stepmother....

Report this comment

lady annApr 8th, 2008 - 15:40:45


It's the picture the press have been waiting for: Camilla wearing a jewel worn by her former nemesis, Diana, Princess of Wales. Now the Duchess has obliged, resulting in much media coverage and yet more (perhaps unfair?) comparisons with the Prince's first wife.
The Duchess of Cornwall was pictured at the royal film premiere of The History Boys in London last Monday wearing a beautiful Prince of Wales pendant and pearl drop on her left shoulder. In reality, this story was always bound to appear, it being a fact that the royal jewels are loaned to generations of royal ladies.

here is the article from the Royalist.com I tried to past the pic for you but it would not copy

Report this comment

ChrisApr 26th, 2008 - 21:37:10

Camilla seems to do very little and yer expects the Royal treatment.
She only fools a few.

Report this comment

SydJun 23rd, 2008 - 21:14:01

Camilla has the face of a 'horse'
the teeth of a 'badger'
and the morals of a 'pig'

Charles MUST REALLY BE an animal lover!!

Report this comment

SydJun 23rd, 2008 - 21:21:46

Oh and I forgot to add..

Camilla,
you're forever wearing Diana's pearl necklace with the sapphire center.
Haven't you ever heard of the old saying?

'Can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.'

A brown paper bag over your head would be much more effective..
or in your case.. a 'feed bag.'

Tally Ho!!

Report this comment

RachelleJun 24th, 2008 - 13:13:25

Here's my take on this situation..

People have always wondered why Charles favored the middle aged - frumpy Camilla - to the beautiful young Diana.
Well - I believe his great attraction towards her was due 'in part' to society's perception that married people are (more or less) - unattainable.
So sneaking around to see Camilla -'the married woman'- was much more exciting than staying at home with the dutiful wife - Diana.
Charles - having been born into a world of priviledge - is accustomed to having his way.
They happily engaged in this illicit affair - despite the consequences. Because for them - behaving morally 'incorrect' - was not only more exciting - but - as with most self-indulgent - spoiled human beings - they also felt they had the 'right' to do anything.
After all - this was the Prince of England - now wasn't it?
OK - so they announce their undying love to the world and finally marry. But what happens?
Well - after 'having it their way' for three years - suddenly the glitter is beginning to wear off.
No more secret meetings - no more battling the Queen's authority - no more breaking of taboos.
It's all come down to the very -'boring'- brass tacks.
Charles and Camilla are now just two aging people - locked in - and recognized - as an 'old married' couple.
And their relationship is starting to sour.
Ah me! Such a pity!
What a real passion killer eh?
(Check out online Charles and Camilla escalated fighting)

Well Chuck and 'Milla' - WELCOME TO THE REAL WORLD!

It's just a shame that Diana paid the price for your mistakes.

Report this comment

NicoleAug 2nd, 2008 - 16:34:52

I think camilla has come so far so people should just give her a chance to prove herself to the royal family and the public

Report this comment

BeckyNov 19th, 2008 - 15:45:12

Camilla feels entitled to much in return for so little. Now there are rumblings about Charles's wish to officially call her Queen when he becomes King. This is in direct opposition to the spin from Clarence House after their marriage. This is called lying. What should we expect from Charles who will do anything to have his way? A wishy-washy King?

Report this comment

Jean AdamsFeb 22nd, 2009 - 13:30:10

I think Camilla herself finds 'being royal' less attractive than she
anticipated and much less alluring a job than the one she had as Charles'
mistress! Seems to me she's stuck with it and a certain kind of justice
has occurred. Tough!!

Report this comment

LeeMar 1st, 2009 - 13:54:03

At first, I didn't like Camilla. Now, I sort of got use to her. I think it's a shame that Charles didn't marry her first. He should have never married Diana, except that he needed heirs to his throne. Camilla was a better match for him, Diana was too young and innocent. Diana went on, to be experienceD and had affairs, just like Prince Charles did. No one is an angel here. Diana said she was in love with Hewitt when she was married to Charles. Maybe Charles threw her to the lions over his gaga relationship with Camilla over the years. Charles and Diana were doomed from the start. He really didn't need to marry a nineteen year old virgin. Although a beautiful girl, he needed someone who could stand up to him, and that was Camilla. Camilla seemed to have a charmed life and was more fun than Diana. Diana seemed to be more doom and gloom. She wasn't happy in her marriage, but she did produce two beautiful sons. It is ironic, when I see old wedding photo's of Diana on her wedding day. Who would have predicted that now Camilla has a shot at becoming THE QUEEN.

Report this comment

LeeMar 1st, 2009 - 14:03:54

I don't know if this is true or not, but it has been said that Diana took all of Charles money when they got divorced. It makes me wonder if Diana was just money-hungry. Her last love affair was with a very rich man and maybe it was to get back at Charles. I wonder how she would feel if Charles married Camilla if she were alive. I don't think that a marriage would ever have been in the works for Camilla, had Diana lived. The public just loved Diana, too much. Charles would have been the evil demon and Diana would have been the angel princess. Camilla, would have been the dog that everyone said she was. I am sure this is not the case, however, the press would have had a field day if Charles would have married Camilla, if DIANA STILL WAS ALIVE!

Report this comment

page: 1