SP4: Bravo for the Dems! They said no.Jun 7th, 2008 - 17:03:12

They flushed her...they said no

no to corruption, and endless scandals as a norm

No to the Clintonesque lying 24/7

no to entitlement and dynastic law getting you to the top

no to Bill constantly around

no to the influence selling

no to the entourage' of Sandy Berg(l)ars, Harold Icke(yy)s, Mr. Hsu's and the rest dirtying up the political landscape 24/7.

no to that loser Sandy McCalluff who's zero for three....

no to the automatons who voted her Senator in New York

Obama said no. He doesn't want her around plotting 24/7 to kill him off, politically, or otherwise.

HE said no to Bill hanging around

He would look weak

He would be the plantation worker

He would fall victim to all of the Clintonistas constantly undermining him.
The dems did good, they gave the party an enema, and Hillary was flushed out to sea. It was the party elders, the Kennedy's, etc., who had the foresight to see this woman for what she was..poison...and deal with her.

Most of all, it was 36 million dem voters who took their party back, who told the New York dems they do not pick their candidates for them...who bucked the superdelgates and the sham they represent...who said they want a fresh start, win or lose.

Now Obama may lie

MCCain may Lie

Hillary WILL lie

Obama may be corrupt

MCcain may be corrupt

Hillary IS corrupt

Nope, they said no more, we wnat new leadership.

Bravo...well done.

Report this comment

tonny from belgiumJun 7th, 2008 - 17:34:16

The post of SP4 is clear in it's intentions;as a supporter of McCain he understands the danger of uniting Obama and Clinton ,hence is silly usual lies and character assasination,repeating for the millionth time the same false accusations .A disgusting way of conducting politics that will never change as it is the perfect representation of the way his brain functions;paranoid and distorted .Democracy merits something better;the discussion of political programs,not this!

Report this comment

Really?Jun 7th, 2008 - 17:34:21

A vote for Obama doesn't necessarily mean these people felt like she was so corrupt, just that they have hopes for 'new' blood in the White House, who might possibly have new, fresh ideas......good lord! When is your book coming out?

Report this comment

SP4: Hey...Tonny...wasn't me...Jun 7th, 2008 - 17:56:58

...it was her own party. It was the party elders too i.e. Kennedy, etc. It was the new dems, the one's who didn't live with the Clintons in office as adults. Even the Hollywierdos cut her loose.

Tonny, it was Obama who rejected her. He knew, correctly, that he would be perceived as weak, as needing her, to win. He also knew, what everyone else knew, was that her baggage would come with her i.e. Bill, all the scandals, the influence selling caught red-handed. He, correctly, knew she would NEVER be loyal, and she would hate him every day in office. He would be undermined every day she was there.

No, 36 million dems, told the supers to shove it and they did. They said they wanted new blood, cut thew cord and ran.

It was Lee Iacoca who said 'the dems are willing to try things..'

He is right today.


The democrat party, for all of it's wrongs, is capable of doing the right thing. It is heartening to see our nation do the right thing.

Report this comment