Obama takes historic Democratic nomination over Clinton (2nd Roundup)
US News
Jun 4, 2008, 4:56 GMT
If you liked this story please support M&C and Buzz the site on Yahoo.
Latest Headlines in US
- 1. In photos: 'USA Elections Mccain and Palin Attend Public Rally'
- 2. John McCain's acceptance speech sets TV ratings record
- 3. SIDEBAR: Indian-American delegate pledged to free market, Republicans
- 4. ANALYSIS: Republicans leave St Paul with possible Obama 'equalizer'
- 5. McCain vows 'change,' chastises own party
Talkback
Add your comment (no registration required)
page: 1 2
One thing definitely needs to be nogociated and that is organizing a decent health care system .Clinton already tried to introduce a modern,efficient health care system but was rebuked by the republican ld conress .To rid health care from the powerful grip of the insurance business will take a lot of energy .they drive billions of dollars of profit from the americans,only one goal for them:making maximum profit by using every trick possible to deny the end user the money they have in custody .if Obama is to be yournew president you will have to make him speak out on this issue and see if he is the man to handle this difficult task .if he teams up with Clinton no doubt she will put her shoulders under this issue and modrnize health care for your benefit .Until now the debate has been concentrated mostly on slogans and propaganda .Give the future of your country more content.
Because like you, he doesn't give a rats ass what tonny from belgium thinks.
Leave it to the British News Services - after screwing with the world's finances for the past half millennium, why would the Brits be any better at News.
Obama did NOT pass the delegate mark of 2118 last night. Not possible - only 36 delegates were available, you soppy dates.
Mark my words - Hillary Clinton will be President. It was already decided by the Danish Queen, among others.
And then she won South Dakota. Obama cannot beat McCain. And if I had to choose my neighbour, McCain or Clinton?
Idiots.
Ahem.
I have more pride in our USA then this!!!!!!!!!!!!
if you have no pride in america because obama is colored then it's time to grow up or better yet just leave .
How would Obama deal with the 100 million christian radicals in the U.S. that have had a free rein to kill muslims in Iraq for 6 years, and support muslim killing and occupation? I mean, if he put a leash on them then there would be a lot of pent up aggressions.
There should be a law in the U.S.: Kill muslim, go to jail; even if it is on foreign soil. Fortunately there are such laws in the U.S. and if christians did what they do in the M.E., but in the U.S., then those christians would go to jail.
We got to kill some heathens, native americans, darkies, wetbacks, chincs, commies, vc, gooks, geeks, and towelheads, just for Christ!
Sometimes the dim witted comments I read on this site really make me shudder - - - for a moment or two anyway.
Many of you live in deeply disturbed worlds.
'Many of you live in deeply disturbed worlds.'
I agree. So, what excuse is there for killing muslims in Iraq?:
(1) WMDs?: No, that was a lie.
(2) al-Qaeda? No, they were not there before the U.S. started killing.
(3) 9/11? No, none of them were Iraqis, none were from Iraq and none had been receiving help from an Iraq jurisdiction.
(4) Defense? No. It is proven that Saddam was all tapped out with essentially no military capabilities.
(5) Democracy? Maybe or maybe not.
So, the excuse for killing muslims is to force democracy on them? Is that a good enough excuse for killing people? Are christians doing the killing? Obviously. Almost all of the soldiers in the U.S. military are christian.
What does it mean to be christian when it amounts to killing? Can christian charity be enough to turn a blind eye to killing muslims just like it was to turn a blind eye to mass raping children (by catholic priests)?
page: 1 2
Latest from M&C Blogs

:-DJun 4th, 2008 - 07:06:14
LOL!
Way to go democrats...
Shot yourselves in both feet.
Report this comment