Clinton thumps Obama in West Virginia primary (2nd Roundup)

US News

May 14, 2008, 4:30 GMT

Washington - Senator Hillary Clinton claimed victory in the Democratic Party's West Virginia presidential primary late Tuesday at a televised rally following the close of polls. 'I am more determined than ever to carry on this campaign until everyone has had a chance ... to be heard,' Clinton said, pumping her supporters for more money to keep her campaign alive. With 93 per cent of polling stations reporting, the former first lady had 67 per cent of the vote compared to 26 per cent for rival Democratic candidate Barack Obama. Clinton's victory speech was upbeat and conciliatory, and she commended rival Democratic candidate Barak Obama. 'I believe that this campaign has been good for the Democratic Party and good for our country,' Clinton said. 'People are discussing and debating issues. They are turning out in record numbers to register and to vote. There is an excitement about politics that is the lifeblood of our democracy.' Major television networks had projected a Clinton victory immediately after voting stations closed Tuesday evening. Clinton closely trails Obama in delegates won for the Democratic presidential nominating convention in August. Despite the narrow margin, her campaign has been declared all but hopeless by most of the national media, with only a handful of small states yet to vote in the intra-party contest. Clinton argued Tuesday night that the contested primary states of Florida and Michigan should see their votes counted. The states voted in January, too early under national party rules, leading to the loss of their convention delegates. 'Some said our campaign was over after Iowa, but then we won New Hampshire. Then we had big victories on Super Tuesday and in Ohio and Texas and Pennsylvania. And, of course, we came from behind to win in Indiana,' Clinton reminded primary voters. 'So, this race isn't over yet. Neither of us has the total delegates it takes to win. And both Senator Obama and I believe that the delegates from Florida and Michigan should be seated.' At this point, neither candidate appears likely in state-by-state contests to secure the 2,025 delegates needed to win the nomination, so the fate of the race is in the hands of the so-called super delegates, a group of about 800 party elite who hold votes independent of the state primaries. Obama has built a slight edge of 12 in the super-delegate count, with about 244 of the 800 still undeclared. Clinton hopes that strong showings in the final primaries will persuade super-delegates to line up behind her and tilt the race in her favour. But a move by the super-delegates to swing the nomination to Clinton could further split the party and make it more difficult to unite after a drawn out campaign that has prompted some voters in Democratic primaries to vow they will vote for presumptive Republican Party nominee John McCain if their candidate is denied the nomination. Many analysts say that Clinton has little chance to convince the super-delegates who lead the centre-left party to use their votes to deny Obama the nomination despite his edge in elected delegates and the total intra-party popular vote. Clinton's campaign was banking on the strong win in West Virginia - a small but important swing state in the general election - to revive her fortunes and convince party leaders that the New York senator is best positioned to forge a broad coalition of voters for the November 4 presidential vote. Only 28 delegates are up for grabs in West Virginia. Without the inclusion of Florida and Michigan, no realistic scenario exists for Clinton to catch Obama in pledged delegates awarded by voters.

Your Talkback on this Story

Note posts made on our older Talkback system will still show below. However, new posts can only be made via the new system (above). We will export the old comments to the new shortly. You can still comment as a guest on the new system but it also allows you to login using various social network and other accounts.

Other features coming soon.

Talkback

page: 1

tonny from belgiumMay 14th, 2008 - 07:32:45

Why such an enormous difference in votes in West Virginia ?One would expect similar proportions in all the states.What is particular about West-Virginia in that regard ?You'll hardly find even a remote hint at the possible explanation .Are we to believe virginians are a different breed of people,or does the explanation reside in the particular economical situation there .
Not one wordin the main press .Why?

Report this comment

No secretMay 14th, 2008 - 11:37:07

there aren't as many African American's in W. Va.States that have a huge
black vote he carries.Back to that old race issue.

Report this comment

Not race...May 14th, 2008 - 15:37:34

It isn't just that, at the start of this campaign the press simply was not doing it's job. (It still isn't but what's new) From the onset the narrative being sold looked more like a coronation for obama then a proper investigation in to who this man is.

It had to come out in dribbles who Obama is and what he has stood for. The bribes and kickbacks from Tony Rezko. His bigot, white hating, America hating pastor who was his spiritual mentor for 20+years. His shoddy record in the state senate with voting 'present' on important issues. His vote changing. His America hating, grievance collecting charity case wife. His association with flag stomping, bomb planting terrorists. His association with Palestinian terrorists. His 'most liberal senator' status from the National Journal, his effort to sign American sovereignty over to the UN... on and on and on...

The more people are getting a look at him the less they like what there is to see.

Report this comment

page: 1

US

Clinton thumps Obama in West Virginia primary (2nd Roundup)

US News

Your Talkback on this Story

Talkback

Similar articles

Latest Headlines in US

From Sites We Like

Latest PopEater News

Latest Cinema Blend News

Latest Tech Herald News

In Monsters and Critics

Corporate

The Fine Print