House passes eavesdropping bill despite Bush veto threat

impeach the stupic c-word.Mar 14th, 2008 - 21:59:10

Nancy Pelosi isn't going to be happy until more Americans are killed by islamist terrorists.

Report this comment

Honest citizens having nothing to fear.Mar 15th, 2008 - 00:13:40

Just freaking bug all phones and lets try to catch these islamic vermin in the act of planning attacks.

Than can we please deport ALL muslims from our nation?

It needs to happen sooner or later.

Look what the islamic filth have done to Western Europe and now they are trying to do it here in America.

Muslims out now.

Report this comment

SP4: What is the expectation?Mar 15th, 2008 - 03:50:43

Are we to expect that our communications are sacrosanct in the face of an enemy that is so successful in exploiting our weaknesses?

Is the Constitution a suicide pact?

Report this comment

tonny from belgiumMar 15th, 2008 - 18:36:52

I see the Hungry Crusader and SP4 are contributing their hallucinations with us again .Did the doctor give you a day off,crusader ?

Report this comment

SP4: Yes, I can see, too that...Mar 15th, 2008 - 20:41:19

...other than some empty insults, Tonny cannot answer my questions with an intelligent response.

Report this comment

PperfectMar 15th, 2008 - 22:31:28

SP4.....'Are we to expect that our communications are sacrosanct in the face of an enemy that is so successful in exploiting our weaknesses?

Is the Constitution a suicide pact?'

No it is not, but millions of us are not ready for 'your kind' to start changing the constitution. No matter what your redneck words say, you only want to change things you do not agree with. With your revisions, lets revise and take gun ownership against the law????

Report this comment

SP4: RetortMar 17th, 2008 - 02:29:23

I don't wish to revise the Constitution for this purpose. I contend it already allows us to do this. This is because it does.

Why do you think this bill is so contentious? The law already allows this kind of eavesdropping. What it also allows is for anyone to sue the compaines who are cooperating with the authorities to be hauled into civil court.

This, of course, is the whole point: libnazis cannot openly stand for their real beliefs, so they use their trial lawyer gestapo to institutionalize their beliefs in the tort courts. If not, why not just pass a restrictive bill? After all, they are the so called leaders in the Congress now, right?

I would revise the Constitution to reflect an enemy who is sanctioned by sovereign nations, crosses borders with impunity and acts as an enemy combatant, while being a saboteur, and is protected by the Geneva accords. This would reflect the world as it is today.

Report this comment