US News
Surging Obama sweeps Clinton in three more polls (Roundup)
Feb 13, 2008, 5:34 GMT
And Also
Barack Obama - View Barack Obama Pictures - Barack Obama News
|
|
|
|
|
Hillary Clinton - View Hillary Clinton Pictures - Hillary Clinton News
|
|
|
|
|
Similar articles
- ANALYSIS: One year on, Massachusetts defeat imperils Obama agenda
- Democrats fumble Kennedy's seat, lose Senate supermajority (Roundup)
- Democrats fumble Kennedy's seat, lose Senate supermajority (1st Lead)
- Democrats lose Kennedy's seat, Senate supermajority (Urgent)
- Crunch time for Obama's Democrats as Massachusetts picks senator
Latest Headlines in US
- 1. Michelle Obama takes centre stage, tackles childhood obesity
- 2. Second snow storm bearing down on US
- 3. Obama discusses jobs, deficit with congressional leaders
- 4. ANALYSIS: Could a foreign government influence US elections?
- 5. Long-serving US congressman dies at 77
Older Talkback
' 'To encourage a country with only rhetoric rather than sound and proven ideas'
oh, he must mean the ones where bush and the neo-cons lied about the non-existent WMD threat that led to 7 years of hell, grotesque inflation, and thousands of american dead and wounded.
ooo yeah. McLamer has got allll the bright ideas
This is a drama being played to show blacks are so important that they can contest in us elections, but every one knows they will not win.
Jamal, by your name it seems you are black, what a negative way of thinking, all races rally behind their peopl, but an ignorant pessimistic fool like you, run your mouth off with such negativity. This is history being made you should be proud and rally and stand behind be it Democrat or Republican, he is a worthy opponent.
why do you have to say African American Barak Obama... do you say Caucasian Hillary Clinton.... his name is Barak Obama
''Jamal, by your name it seems you are black, what a negative way of thinking''
Why does Jamal have to be black?
The dems are in a real pickle: If Obama sweeps the primaries, a definite possibility, then they go to the convention.
Now there, they have the 'superdelegates'.
Who are they? Go take a look. Guess who most of these have been affiliated with over the last 15 years?????
Hint: Not Obama.
Now, if they usurp the will of the party faithful and elect Hirrary, a guy like McCain can get the voters who were shortchanged. After all, he ain't that republican!
If, however, Barak is picked, the same can be said for Hirrary's followers who don't want him.
Just wait.
SP4, the super delegates are the people in Congress etc, etc, why should they vote in Hillary, do you want i.e. another Father Bush 4 years, Clinton 8 years, Bush 8 years, and yet another Clinton? We need a change we are tired and no longer want these people policies and governing, do you think husband clinton is going to sit still? no one can control him, he is strong willed, lets put new blood, new policies and governing not the same old same old. The people voted Barak, if he gets the votes enought to clinch the nomination why not. Personally, I think McCain is quite old but if Clinton is nominated I'll vote Republican.
Barak may carry the states, and carry the convention floor. Nonetheless, if it is just right, the superdelegates may decide this. What if they go against the will of the other delegates?
The dems defying the will of the people?????
Certainly not!!!
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
I am aware delagates especially the super one 'flip flop' occasionally, yes, it seems as thou the superD with decide, but do you think they want Clinton in the white house? I know one person who is rooting and has a full working force behind Barak, that Tom Dashiel?? think back what Pres. Clinto did to him, after he worked so hard getting him elected and the superD. okay. Not many of them want to see Hillary in their either, yes they have their friends but it does not amount to what they may need, sure people can be persuaded but not all. If I had to predict Obama will get it (god bless).
Defy! this race is the most interesting in many a years. The people has tasted, they voted, they saw and they will asskick.
Super Delegates is just another example of the good ol boy system in Washington and the coruption that surrounds the US political system.
Never mind that the people have chosen. When will the American voter open his eyes to the fact that their voice doesn't mean squat in the current two party system.
That last post was not from me. My spelling is terrible but not my grammer.
Super Delegates are just another example of the good ol boy system in Washington and the coruption that surrounds the US political system.
Never mind that the people have chosen. When will the American voter open his eyes to the fact that his voice doesn't mean squat in the current two party system.
'SP4: The real oneFeb 13th, 2008 - 18:18:30
That last post was not from me. My spelling is terrible but not my grammer.'
Your logic and cognitive abilities are also 'terrible.' You language is also not conducive to gaining you any respect or credibility. Why is it that whenever you have a need to go to ther bathroom, you do it all over this website? Also, who cares if your grammer is not terrible, what's that got to do with spelling? Nobody cares about her or your gramper, or your daddy or your spawn or you.
It's spelled grammar anyway....
douche SP4, 'okay and the pot call the kettle black'. Your grammer and your spelling is just as atrocious, get the valid points made, credability, no ones looking for that, we all are just voicing our opinions, however it may come out. Pious ass...
'credability,'
Your spelling sucks as bad as you, 'Pious ass...'
To get it straight, I am using a voice recognition program, because my arms got blown off defusing an IED. It is also on a Microsnot based PC. So if my spelling 'sucks,' take your attitude and go blow it our your arse.
An online list of the Democrats' super-delegates is available here:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_Democratic_Party_Superdeleg ates
A quick glance of the names is instructive. The choice of the Democrat Party's nominee rests in the hands of incumbent Democrats, not in the hands of the rank-and-file membership.
The Goopers effect this same end by other ends, so they have no real room to gloat.
John Zogby, an extraordinarily skilled pollster and a Democrat, brought up an interesting point today. He said that the real question on his mind was not who the super-delegates would support, but why had they not already come out in support of the Clintons?
It is an excellent question. The Clintons have had some twelve years to shape this battlefield and they are not known for allowing opportunities to slip past them. You really do have to ask in the face of all this, what went wrong?
My personal answer to this question is, 'The Clintons.'
noharness. It leads to nothing. Just like your 'argument.'
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_Democratic_Party_Superdelegates
My apologies for the flawed link.
'@Hey.....
To get it straight, I am using a voice recognition program, because my arms got blown off defusing an IED. It is also on a Microsnot based PC. So if my spelling 'sucks,' take your attitude and go blow it our your arse. '
To get it straight, you are a liar and you aren't fooling anyone. Oh, and you are an idiot who can't spell either.
Your Talkback on this Story