US News
Jan 3, 2007, 18:48 GMT
Bush seeks to 'hasten' Iraqi takeover of security
And Also
Similar articles
- Obama wants more from Iraqi leaders as pullout looms
- US-Iraqi talks on forces agreement pressured from all sides
- The US military's eyes in the sky - unmanned aerial vehicles
- Democrats unpersuaded by Petraeus testimony
- Five years on, Bush vows to win in Iraq
Latest Headlines in US
- 1. Tiger Woods' slightly injured in car mishap (Roundup)
- 2. It's official: Tiger Woods' injuries were slight (3rd Lead)
- 3. Tiger Woods treated after car accident (2nd Lead)
- 4. Tiger Woods seriously injured in car accident (1st Lead)
- 5. REPORT: Tiger Woods seriously injured in car accident
Older Talkback
page: 1
The first two recruits should be the Bush Twins!!!
Great first comment. Very helpful.
The 655,000 U.S. victims in Iraq do not include the hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, mostly children, who died during a 12-year era of U.S.-imposed sanctions on Iraq from 1991 to 2003, but those deaths, at least, were obscured by a fig leaf of legality, since the sanctions had been approved by the U.N. Security Council. Bush's Iraq War had no such cover: It was deemed 'illegal' by Kofi Annan, the former U.N. Secretary-General.
The number of Iraqui's murdered by America in that time (mostly children)
is estimated at 500,000 so add this to the bush genoside of 655000 and the americans have a proud score of 1,155,000. well done hitler I hope you are proud.
You hung your old freind the other day for killing a fraction of your score with weapons of mass destruction that you gave to him. well done be proud and may god forgive you or just let you drown in the blood of the hundreds of thousand of babies youve slaughtered in their beds.
I was a Christian until I saw what so called christians are capable of.
'The number of Iraqui's murdered by America in that time (mostly children)
is estimated at 500,000 so add this to the bush genoside of 655000 and the americans have a proud score of 1,155,000'.
The 'Americans didn't do it sir. Poor choice of words and I take exception to your comment. The majority are against what is going on and we have been almost from the beginning. On 9-11, everybody wanted to strike out and level those responsible. The USA had the sympathy of most countries then. As this tragedy played out, Bush saw to it that almost every international law (and most domestic law) was fractured. The average American is against anything Bush might stand for.
PS Don't buy into the polls. They've always given Bush a few extra points.
It is nice to see that you libs want to be killed of psycopathic dictators. Saddam himself raped and nurdered and used WMD on villages across Iraq. Islamic countries have killed countless millions, enslaved people in various countries, raped, pilliaged and conquered for 1400 years and continues to do so, Islamic followers genocided the entire population of north africa, nearly all of the former persian religion, they supplanted the native population of the middle east and wiped out the christian populations of North Africa and the Middle East(The most recent was the formerly majority christian Lebanon. Islamic countries are cultures that promote killing their own children to better themselves and all women live under perpetual threat of rape by the next warlord to death by their own family for any infraction against the supposed law of Islam. Islamic phycho leaders have threated the United States population with death and have the means and will to attempt their threat.
Yet, you liberal idiots continue to support the Late saddam and these islamic phychos when you claim Bush genocided Iraqis and lied about the war. Learn some history fools, The liberals tried to appease Hitler from 1934 to 1939, believing the same as you. Germany had no army in 1934 and was under treaty from WWI and unbelievably he broke his treaties? Had Europe and America listened to then MP Churchill in 1934, the 50+ million dead in WWII would not have happened. But then that would have meant the libs would need to admit that some countries are truly bad places.
Well thanks again, I hope it is you the Islamic psychos kill as the rape your mothers because it is you fools who continue to legitimize and support the worst possible excuses for human animals in our lifetime as you continue to blame the West and America instead of the Islamic psychos and their 1400 year bloodthirsty goal of global caliphate.
I have no support for sadam or anyone like him nor could I possibly support israel and americas attemts to rule the middle -east for oil and nothing else.
I am irish and am not a muslim but to spread that Israeli poison about muslim people is just what hitler tried to do to the Jews.
There are one and a half billion muslims in the world and 99.9999999% are good people who love peace and love their children and love life. Their holy books preach love and understanding and peace and pay great homage to jesus and his mother. They are the most freindly and helpful people you could ever meet.
but yes human nature has looneys on every side who will read into their holy books reasons to fear and hate what they do not believe.
American pentacostals (george bushes brigade) believe that the second coming of Jesus needs an apocoliptic war in the middle east and that they need the jews to hold onto Jerusalem for the second coming. They believe that the jews will then convert to their rediculous mumbo-jumbo and they will all go to heaven.
If their is a god and he comes back it will be those so called christians
that will perish at his hands for using his name to kill generations of innocent women and children. If being a liberal and a socialist and being anti American and Israeli foreign policy makes me a terrorist then Im proud to be one
It's pretty amazing that the best defense you can give Bush is that Saddam killed almost as many, as many or more of his own people... Nope. Sorry.
Saddam wasn't a good guy. Hitler wasn't a good guy and guess what.. Bush isn't either.
This isn't a case of who is bad as if the others are good. Or that by pointing out that one is a sorry excuse for humanity that the others are good. So don't sit back and act like bashing Bush is the same as supporting Saddam.
I am one of the stupid liberals you want to complain about. You bet I want to work with diplomacy. To compare Germany and Europe of the 1930s-40s with the Middle East of today is another type of lunacy. The inter-relationships of the Middle East due to economy, culture, religion, oil and other factors binds these countries and their governments every bit as much as it adds to their problems. Indeed, much of the issue with Iraq was because of Saddam's choices in friends and enemies.
Much of Saddam's ability to desecrate his own people was due to the relationship he shared with the rest of the world (like the Bushes, GHW and GW) and how his oil gave him access to technology (like nuclear) and weapons that he then used against the Shiites.
Ironically, his dictatorship enjoyed more 'peace' than the current 'democracy' offers. But yes, one must consider it something little more than irony or the proof of how what comes around goes around or the cycle of brute force when we hear Bush saying how executing Saddam was the right thing, and that the Iraqi people have chosen democracy.
That's funny. The president lies, for who nkows what, Chenney gets rich, drunk and shoots his hunting buddy. Sodomy increases as abstanace is tought in school, the defecit is huge, FBI agents names are xposed in the news by the administration, GOP lawmakers are trying to bed little page boys, while other GOP members cover for him - and some moronic clown is trying to twist it all into a nice little 'faux' cliche about lberals supporting hitler. My god son. How short is your memory. You lost a historic number of seats in congress with this stupidity and you are choosing to move forward with this ignorance. I guess all of us stupid liberals should just smile and watch you crash and burn.....
page: 1






Your Talkback on this Story