Analysis: Castro's departure won't bring quick change in US policy

Washington - Cuban leader Fidel Castro's resignation provides an opportunity for the United States to take a fresh look at relations with the communist island less than 200 kilometres off its border, but analysts doubt the Bush administration will budge from its hardline approach until there are signs of real democratic change. Castro's younger brother Raul, who has been running the country since Castro fell ill in July 2006, is a committed communist and is unlikely, aside from some mild economic adjustments, to depart much from Fidel's agenda or introduce the reforms Washington insists are essential for easing the hostility that has characterized relations for nearly five decades. 'The Bush administration's posture has been, 'We won't change anything until Cuba changes completely,'' said Phil Peters, an analyst at the Lexington Institute in Washington. President George W Bush in 2004 tightened sanctions on Cuba to hasten the collapse of the Castro regime, and set up a transitional team to ready the US effort to assist the country toward a democracy and provide millions of dollars in humanitarian relief once the regime was gone. The United States has had no formal diplomatic ties with Cuba since the Caribbean island nation allied with the Soviet Union after the 1959 revolution that brought Castro to power. Washington has had strict economic sanctions on Cuba since the early 1960s. 'We remain hopeful that the Cuban people will one day be able to elect their leaders, that they will one day be able to actually build democratic institutions that serve the needs of the people and that reflect the will of the people,' State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said of Castro's announcement. 'There's no change in our policies,' McCormack added. 'I don't believe that there is anyone contemplating that at this point either.' During the Cold War, US-Cuban relations were marked by numerous attempts by Washington on Castro's life, the botched 1961 Bay of Pigs invasion, the 1962 Cuban missile crisis that brought the United States and Soviet Union to brink of nuclear war, and a mass exodus of Cuban refugees to the United States over several decades. Raul Castro, who has always been viewed as his brother's successor, has consolidated control since Castro transferred power and has been effectively running the government, analysts say. Raul will benefit from a Cuban economy that has been growing because of expanding trade with China and Venezuela, meaning the island's economy will not be desperate enough to comply with US demands, said Larry Birns of the Council on Hemispheric Affairs in Washington. 'Raul is not going to come forward with any dramatic reforms,' Birns said. 'He is going to be a maintainer. Not a divider, not a decider, but a maintainer.' Domestic political reasons also limit Bush's ability to soften his policy on Cuba. Cuban Americans make up a large voting bloc in Florida, a critical state in presidential elections, and generally advocate a tough policy against the regime. But the analysts don't rule out the possibility that relations could improve. The Democratic Party took control of Congress in January for the first time in 12 years and is traditionally less hardline about Cuba than Republicans. Some have already said they will pursue legislation to relax sanctions on Cuba. Bush will have the power to veto that legislation, but could come under increasing pressure to change his approach toward Cuba now that Castro has stepped down. 'I think the country will take a hard look at (the policy),' Peters said. Castro's departure 'is a very newsworthy event and people are going to focus on Cuba. Congress will reexamine it and hopefully the administration will too. But there is nothing automatic here.'

And Also

Look Back at the Worst Celebrity Breakups

Look Back at the Worst Celebrity Breakups - PopEater
GASP: Goldstriker creates world's most expensive iPhone - The Tech Herald
USA Switches January Returns To One-A-Night - Cinema Blend
Guide to Avoiding Red Carpet Faux Pas - PopEater
A&E series 'Hoarders' and 'Intervention' premiere Monday, Nov. 30th, preview

Your Talkback on this Story

Latest Headlines in US

Older Talkback

page: 1 2 3 4 5

Thanks for repeating your BS over and overMar 2nd, 2008 - 02:45:31

'.. arrogantly slapping the whole world in the face.'

Again you little nobody, you do not speak for the world. Again, imprisoning murderous islamist scumbags isn't slapping anybody in the face and Again you complete moron keeping them locked until it it's time to put them against the wall is common sense.

' Then you can act surprised, offended and justified for slapping them again,'

Again, there have been deadly islamist attacks in:

India and the Sudan and Algeria and Afghanistan and New York and Pakistan and Israel and Russia and Chechnya and the Philippines and Indonesia and Nigeria and England and Thailand and Spain and Egypt and Bangladesh and Saudi Arabia and Ingushetia and Dagestan and Turkey and Kabardino-Balkaria and Morocco and Yemen and Lebanon and France and Uzbekistan and Gaza and Tunisia and Kosovo and Bosnia and Mauritania and Kenya and Eritrea and Syria and Somalia and California and Argentina and Kuwait and Virginia and Ethiopia and Iran and Jordan and United Arab Emirates and Louisiana and Texas and Tanzania and Germany and Australia and Pennsylvania and Belgium and Denmark and East Timor and Qatar and Maryland and Tajikistan and the Netherlands and Scotland and Chad and Canada and China and Nepal and the Maldives and... pretty much everywhere they bump in to an infidel.

So who is 'slapping' whom? These monsters need to be defeated, and the more humiliating the defeat the better. I would say the same for the anonymous cowards who defend them from the safety of the internet, but you have done a great job of humiliating yourself here.

US

US Features

Analysis: Castro's departure won't bring quick change in US policy

And Also

Your Talkback on this Story

Similar articles

Latest Headlines in US

Older Talkback

From Sites we Like

In Monsters and Critics

Corporate

The Fine Print