US Features
Jan 20, 2008, 8:13 GMT
Still no Republican frontrunner as McCain picks up speed
And Also
Similar articles
- Obama selects chief of staff, to meet Bush on Monday (Roundup)
- Tributes after Obama's victory, transition begins (Roundup)
- Obama invades traditionally Republican Virginia
- Winning votes is only the last hurdle for US minor parties
- Palin, Biden fight over change, economy, war on terror (Roundup)
Latest Headlines in US
- 1. Social-climbers summoned over White House security breach
- 2. Suspect in quadruple police execution evades capture (1st Lead)
- 3. Four police officers slain in coffee shop "execution"
- 4. Struggles at home leave Obama hamstrung at Copenhagen (Feature)
- 5. Four US police officers shot dead near air force base (1st Lead)
Via BuzzFeed
Older Talkback
Notice Tonny's argument, after 7 years of hearing how crooked Bush, Cheney, and the Tooth Fairy are, he now wants to silence the speech on al of the Clintons pecadillos.
Wnat to debate the issues, instead of integrity? Be my guest!
Want a health care debate? Go see how health care fares in states where the dem lib cansidates live versus the bad old republicans.
New York has some of the highest insurance premiums in the US, and one of the lowest levels of insured. The libnazi cow towing to the Trial Lawyers has pump the price of health care to stratospheric levals and is NEVER mentioned by the libnazi press.
Now, we are supposed to believe that these lib chuckleheads have some kind of solution, while guys like Romney have been DOING on health care and succeeding, abeit to a small degree.
Don't like my repsonse? Go check out education: The dem libs have been sucking the heads of public ed for thirty years and it has stadily gotten worse. In fact, ever since the fed has goten into the ed business, it has declined. Need an ironclad example?
Washington DC - here is a region entirely funded by fed dollars and is a disgrace. In this case no one can blame a state for failure and the feds just keep pouring good money after bad. The result: the liberals are BEGGING for vouchers!
hahahahahahahahaha!
Fed Ed is dead. The only thing left is the funeral.
No, Tonny, the debate is legit and after 7 years of hearing about the big bad wolf Bush, we're going to highlight EVERY crooked shortcoming of Hillary and her minions. It was important to you, now it's important to ALL of you!
Re:' 'I know how to make bullies miserable.' How do you do this, reveal the fact that not only are you wrong on most of your 'facts', but that you are in fact a cross-dressing right wing neo-con?'
If I am wrong on my facts, you are doing a rather miserable job of pointing out my errors. As to how I make bullies miserable, I'll let you figure it out. Come to think of it, you may never figure it out. You seem to like pain and anger. If that is the case, I'll be happy to carry on with what I am doing.
'now it's important to ALL of you!'
How omniscient of him to see what is important to me. He is approaching the stature of No-awareness himself.
He says: 'The only opinion you ever fully express on these boards is your opinion of me. How did I become so important to you? Aren't your ideas and opinions more important to you than I am? Why don't you try expressing them?'
I do post items that are germane to the topic. Nr. ego himself, Nohairness, rarely stays on topic and is merely an amusing little side-bar. As for making bullies miserable, you really must enjoy self-flagellation.
'I am from New York City, does that entitle me to call you an idiot?'
That would definitely be a case of the pot calling the kettle black. '
LOL, So you admit to being an idiot?
''So why do you insist on proving him right?'
Exactly how did did that happen?'
Well, if he is calling you a 'an idiot, moron, fool' and saying that you have 'memory or mental problems etc' and you pipe up idiotic, moronic commentary that is foolish, flaky and deranged you kind of prove his point.
' Maybe in some sense of mind-numbness caused by the polluted atmosphere in New Yuck'
LOL, never been here, eh?
'But that is a very narrow paradigm, quite similar to the typical yankee's uneducated programmed 'thinking' mode.'
Uneducated? LOL! Look, clown, you are embarrassing yourself here. You repeatedly demonstrate hat you can not give a counterargument to anything that anyone else says and you are not quick witted enough to be an interesting troll. Once again, if you want to play you would do well to attack the argument, not the person making it. Once you have destroyed it, then you have license to be insulting. As it stands now, you are just an idiot who whines that other people are saying something.
Look... Here is what you do:
SP4: 'Hello, I sunny days as opposed to cloudy ones.'
You: 'Blah blah, you just say that because you are a douche bag, blah blah think the way I think even though I haven't ventured an opinion, blah blah, some playground insult.' (Add in a few Non sequitur and some misused words where the 'blahs' are.)
Noharness: 'Sunny days are nice.'
You: 'You not nice no headlice and uneducated, everyone look at me now because I am an attention whore.'
You see, you just look like you were raised on a diet of lead paint chips.
Instead, you could try to argue that rain is necessary for crops or that you like to see rainbows or that you like to jump in puddles... whatever. Or you could even AGREE that sunny days are nice. That part is up to you. That requires 'reasoning'which is probably why you haven't been doing it. But do try.
Got it? This is our last crack at it so if you have any questions ask now.
Blather on, New Yucker. Your logic is faulty, your agument isn't even specious, and your thinking, in general, is smoggy. What is in your brain-pan, a soggy Quiche Lorraine?
Precisely where is your on-topic comment?
'Blather on, New Yucker.'
Aaah yes, I see it was pearls before swine. All that you are capable of is infantile retorts like that.
'Your logic is faulty,'
How, exactly so? Do explain.
'your agument isn't even specious,'
Thank you. Perhaps you should look some of these words up before you use them. Idiot.
'and your thinking,[sic] in general,[sic] is smoggy.'
You do love your verbal masturbation.
'What is in your brain-pan, a soggy Quiche Lorraine?'
So much for attacking the argument. I guess you are too stupid to do that.
'Precisely where is your on-topic comment?'
Right here:
'What's 50 years of service to the USA versus Obama's lengthy resume of... a term in the senate. Or Hillary's lengthy resume of... being someone's wife and the worst (jr) senator my state has. (That is saying something when you consider that the other one is Charles Schumer.)'
Do try and keep up, eh?
The use of (sic) is inappropriate. It is short for spelling in copy. There was nothing wrong with the spelling, unless you Yuckers spell things differently over there in yaya-land. You are one sic (sic) puppy, boy. Perhaps YOU should use a dictionary and have someone interpret the meanings in very, very simple words. Have a nice day, y'all.
Specious: having a false look of truth or genuineness.
I do believe that the person who is not a New Yucker, is correct when he says the N,Y.'s argument isn't even that. Yucky's post is specious.
'Or Hillary's lengthy resume of... being someone's wife and the worst (jr) senator my state has.'
What is wrong with being someone's wife? Do you have a thing against women? Do you like little boys?
As fot the 'worst (jr) senator', where is your proof of that, other than your spoonfed neocon programming? If you think she is bad, why don't you do something constructive with your life and run for Senator? The answer is quite simple - you don't have the guts or the gonads.
on topic post comes a little late, and only after he was caught out and challenged on the lack of it. Back-pedal, Yuckie, full steam astern.
'New Yuckies
on topic post comes a little late, and only after he was caught out and challenged on the lack of it. Back-pedal, Yuckie, full steam astern. '
First page you idiot, 3rd quote down... Boy, you are as sharp as a marble.
'Kenneth
Specious: having a false look of truth or genuineness'
So my argument did not have a false look of truth or genuineness...
Good.
That wasn't what I was aiming for you smart fellow.
That would be: 'SP4: No, it does not'
YOU are SPfool? no wonder there was an idiot in the woodwork.
Shuck and jive fool. You do the Noharness twist. Your latest posts were as New Yucker, and until caught out, you had posted nothing on topic.
'That wasn't what I was aiming for'
So what, exactly were you aiming at? Do you have a clue?
You also said this: 'This is our last crack at it so if you have any questions ask now.'
How many last cracks at you are there going to be? That sentence indicates that you were leaving. You are still here. Typical yank. Can't believe a word it says.
It syas: 'So my argument did not have a false look of truth or genuineness... '
What was said was he didn't even have that. So his argument was even less than specious. At that level we are getting down into pure bunk. Do you understand now, smog-head?
'What is wrong with being someone's wife?'
It does not qualify you to be president of the United States. Since you are undoubtedly too irrational to get or maintain a relationship with a man I am afraid that even if it were some kind of career stepping stone to the oval office you would still be disqualified for being an ignorant bi*ch.
' Do you have a thing against women?'
Heh...
'Do you like little boys? '
Nope, not 'little girls' either. Especially the irrational, childish, waste of time ones. You know the kind I mean, the ones who are so insecure that they have to hop on the bandwagon of OTHER peoples ideas but when it comes time to articulate any of their own they just revert to calling people neocons or other infantile names. Look, it is not Bush's fault you were too ugly to get asked to the prom.
'As fot[sic] the 'worst (jr) senator', where is your proof of that,''
My proof is that the only vote of importance that idiot has made was FOR the Iraq war. She has done NOTHING else of note in her career as senator. Normally senators try to bring in federal dollars to their constituency, she has lost them. Where is my other proof? Name a positive thing she has done for the state of New York... (I realize that would mean that you would have to use your brain, so I expect that question will lead to you spewing more kindergarten excrement.)
' other than your spoonfed[sic] neocon programming?'
LOL. Again, you have nothing to contribute so you revert back to your little buzz word. 'Neocon'.
' If you think she is bad, why don't you do something constructive with your life and run for Senator? '
Thanks anyway, I like the job I have now. You should try getting a job. You know... since you are too ignorant to have a relationship it might be a good outlet for your obvious frustration issues.
'The answer is quite simple - you don't have the guts or the gonads'
Aaah yes, You are such a little lady. No wonder you have nothing else to do other then follow SP4 around and whine like an idiot. Why don't you curl up with another carton of ice cream and pester noharness for saying something you charming, rational, oh so attractive little soul.
Your Talkback on this Story