US Features
By Tony Czuczka Jul 4, 2007, 11:00 GMT
It's the Bill and Hillary show for 2008
And Also
Similar articles
- Obama selects chief of staff, to meet Bush on Monday (Roundup)
- Tributes after Obama's victory, transition begins (Roundup)
- Obama invades traditionally Republican Virginia
- Winning votes is only the last hurdle for US minor parties
- Palin, Biden fight over change, economy, war on terror (Roundup)
Latest Headlines in US
- 1. White House gate crashers: Reality TV in the making (News Feature)
- 2. Suspect in quadruple police execution evades capture (Roundup)
- 3. "Doughnut killings" of Seattle police shock America (News Feature)
- 4. Social-climbers summoned over White House security breach
- 5. Suspect in quadruple police execution evades capture (1st Lead)
Via BuzzFeed
Older Talkback
page: 1 2
You describe just what the Republicans wanted and got in Bush! And I agree with the intimidation thing - it is sounding loud and clear in most of the postings!
I think it sounds more like the Noharness/SP4 show!
Oh, well hell! May as well add a little fuel to the fire:
//online.wsj.com/article/SB118372769027759227.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
And, here's a little more fuel:
//blogcentral.jpost.com/index.php?cat_id=4&blog_id=73&blog_post_id=1280 #anchor1
Anyone know what the principle difference between John McCain and Hillary Clinton is? McCain looks better in pants.
big time!
when someone doesn't have anything better to remark about, they criticize a woman's looks and appearance? That doesn't seem to happen with the many dog-ugly men in the public eye!
Yeah, I'm SO intimidated I think I'll beat my momma right after finish beating my wife. Maybe I'll slap my sister around a little while I'm at it.
I mean, if you're gonna be found guilty, you may as well be good and guilty, right?
Why, you are so thick that I think I'll go choke that stupid cat while I'm in the mood. I just hate fuzzy purring things.
No, the republicans voted for what they WANTED, but Bush, even if he lacks a brain, has a BACKBONE!
BIG mistake, huh? Ask his political opponents. Kerry-the-genius. Gore the internet inventor, Richards-the-lush (Gore too!). They tried to bamboozle their way into office and got bitch slapped by a real politician.
God, if only he could run against Hillary. I'd buy tickets!
That's enough to make me vomit!
Being intimidated and being an abuser aren't exactly in the same catagory!
Well, I thought I'd go ahead and beat 'em to the punch. That was going to be the next accusation. Of course, it just became clear today that the Billary is having a difficult time attracting the male vote among independents and some Demmies, so I'm sure this is what provoked those silly accusations in the first place.
That's fine. Accuse all you want. I am not intimidated by Hillary. The problem I have with her is that I don't share her views on a number of issues and I dislike her style. If you are inclined to think of me as being intimidated by her, be my guest, but it makes about as much sense as accusing me of being a wife beater and general misogynist.
That was a generalization regarding the male population being intimidated by a woman running for President - not a personal vendetta, but...........if the shoe fits, wear it; if not, get on with your life! You know as well as I do that there are many men who would not vote for a woman regardless of her ability or that they even like her. The same is true of a black person. It's a macho, good-old-boy thing with a lot of men. Also, I'm not particularly saying Hlllary is the best person for the job. Everyone who is running deserves respect and attention to what they stand for in order for the public to make a half-way good decision, unlike the last election might I add!
Okay, fine, just be advised that I have indeed listened to Mrs. Clinton and I have listened to her husband and he wasn't all that bad as a President, to tell you the truth. His hands were tied by the extreme left in his party, just a Republicans find themselves hampered by the extreme 'right' in their party, but he did fairly well. Congress stopped him from doing the worst he could have done and he did show a little courage when it was needed.
Does that mean I want Hillary Clinton in the White House? No. I don't like her politics and she has already 'served' two terms. I think it is a real bad idea to pull this kind of stunt. It violates the spirit of the Constitution if not the letter. Same deal for the Bushbaby. I didn't vote for him, either.
I don't like Hillary, for her politics. I especially don't like her for her personal vendetta's on some of Bush's nominees, but that's politics. Nonetheless, what goes around, comes around.
I wonder how long before Bill gets caught with another woman?
And what does that have to do with anything? Aren't most men doing someone other than their wives anyway?
Is there going to be any candidate worth voting for? Of course ANYONE is going to look good next to W which could be a problem. No one seems to be touching Obama with a 10 foot pole with much criticism - hmmmmm.
Come on guys,let's face it .The two biggest problems for your country are yet to be discovered by the larger part of the population.A hint,it is not terrorism .Another hint ,every year one them is already making more casualties than the attack on the twin towers ?Hmmmm that fits too much problems .Let us eliminate guncontrol out of the equation,we had that before .What is left,let me see...Healthcare ?
Could be ?Nothing comes out of the Wgite House concerning the sorry state of it .So it is healthcare then .
Let me see the other one .HHHmmmm,wildfires in California,inundations in Oklahoma and Texas,healthwaves...could it be global warming ?No ,not possible ,it does not exist for the White House .Oh but wait a minute ,so did healthcare .So then it is the other problem looming at the horizon .In fact it is the biggest chalenge in the history of mankind .
Without a changed attitude of the voters for your next president ,things will turn into a disaster for the world population.Twice a mandate of gour years will mean the potential end of the very existence of your own nature and population,period .
Consider the different stance of yout two currents of political thinking in comtemporary politics .Which current spent time on these issues ?
Now carefully read the ravings of SP4 which will invariably follow any criticism towards your present administration .Then decide ,distrust anybody throwing mud and offering nothing else .
RE:'Come on guys,let's face it .The two biggest problems for your country are yet to be discovered by the larger part of the population.A hint,it is not terrorism .Another hint ,every year one them is already making more casualties than the attack on the twin towers ?Hmmmm that fits too much problems .Let us eliminate guncontrol out of the equation,we had that before .What is left,let me see...Healthcare ?Could be ?Nothing comes out of the Wgite House concerning the sorry state of it .So it is healthcare then .'
Surprise! It is still automobile accidents, just as it has been for years and years.
Let me see the other one .HHHmmmm,wildfires in California,inundations in Oklahoma and Texas,healthwaves...could it be global warming ?No ,not possible ,it does not exist for the White House .Oh but wait a minute ,so did healthcare .So then it is the other problem looming at the horizon .In fact it is the biggest chalenge in the history of mankind .
Without a changed attitude of the voters for your next president ,things will turn into a disaster for the world population.Twice a mandate of gour years will mean the potential end of the very existence of your own nature and population,period .'
Surprise again, Tonny. The US is ahead of every country in actually doing something on this so-called 'problem' despite the fact that they are non-solutions to a non-problem. You are only upset because we did not sign those stupid treaties that would have gutted our economy. I will give you partial credit, I do think we are not building enough nuclear power plants, and we should be converting over to all diesel engines in our automobiles and light trucks, but the Dear Speaker and Senators Boxer and Feinstein dislike diesels so we are having a little problem doing things right. Beyond that, we are already leading the way and we will soon be cleaner than the EU ever imagined possible.
RE:'Consider the different stance of yout two currents of political thinking in comtemporary politics .Which current spent time on these issues ?
Now carefully read the ravings of SP4 which will invariably follow any criticism towards your present administration .Then decide ,distrust anybody throwing mud and offering nothing else .'
It is pretty damned clear from all of this that you are truly ignorant on anything but your own socialist/communist agenda, Tonny. You know nothing of how American politics actually works. You cannot distinguish between the political posturing and the actual doing.
What did Albert Gore do while he was in the US Senate? He advocated a 'carbon tax' that he he knew damned good and well had no chance of getting out of committee, then he turned right around with the rest of them and bitched about high gasoline prices. You want Americans to stop burning so much fuel? Raise the prices on the fuel. That works. The rest is posturing and bullshit.
You want to reduce health care costs? Undo this Frankensteinian monster of a health care system put together by our politicians and let Americans buy their medicines from abroad. Prices will go down of their own accord. These are obvious and easily implemented solutions, but what do we get? More posturing and regulation based on nonsense.
page: 1 2
Your Talkback on this Story