Don EarlJan 30th, 2007 - 15:31:19

RE 'Hillary Clinton says her experience in dealing with 'evil and bad men'
would help her as president.'

Not much to interpret there. Where do you think campaign contributions come from?
What America needs is someone who doesn't make a lifetime career of such dealings.

It sure would be nice to dump these fifth column Zionists and get someone who
isn't a traitor in office for a change.

Report this comment

SP4: She's just refering to her husband!Jan 30th, 2007 - 20:17:10

There is a gold plated example! If she can cope with him, she can cope with anyone!

Bear in mind, she just lets him get away with...well...everything.

and this is the person who wants to be President?

Read 'Bloodsport'

Report this comment

Well Al....Jan 31st, 2007 - 04:53:23

Perhaps Bush has, but he's not dumb enough to get caught, or, lie to a federal judge about it.

One other thing, and this might surprise a liberal: Not every man wants to pop the women in front of him, or at least has the control to manage it effectively.

SP4

Report this comment

Just ask Vince Foster!Jan 31st, 2007 - 04:58:54

Hillary was going to feed him to the wolves on the FBI records scandal.

A white House staffer blamed him for it, after he was dead and could not clear his own name.

This is in the congressional record. It was on C-Span

SP4

Report this comment

tonny from belgiumJan 31st, 2007 - 09:26:52

Comments on Hillary Clinton 's commitment to become the next president are mostly reduced to a smear campaign about private matters of the subject ,not even pertaining to the public domain . .The simple trick is to trhrow mud as much as possible and hope some of it will stick .Is this the level of debate typical for the future of politics in the US .Confronted with major problems like the dramatic influence of global warming or the continuous lies of the Bush administration and about half of the GOP it seems that those responsible for the quagmire the US is currently in have no better solution than to inject machiavelistic slander and dubious personal attacks into this urgent debate .Simpletons always reduce a rational debate to the level of their own misunderstanding .
When Francois Mitterand was asked if he had an illegitimal daughter by the rightwing press in France in an attempt to tarnish his reputation he shrugged of the questionner just replying 'so what of it ?' .Case closed immediately and definitely .
That is the way to separate private matters from public life aswe understand it .But of course religious biggots and zelots prefer to pry on the private life of persons whom advocate ideas they oppose to .Have these hypocritsalsoarguments against the political ideasoris that not even necessary ?
.

Report this comment

When it comes to Hilary ...Jan 31st, 2007 - 15:56:32

When it comes to Hilary ... SP4's posts all sound like a frightened little chicken.

So what you so scared of Sprint?

Apparently she makes you so affraid that you feel the need to do a preemptive smear campaign.

If you'd watch the video of her comments, it's very clear it was just a joke from her. (kinda like your posts are a joke ... we all get it, 'cept you maybe)

Report this comment

oh my gawd sp4Jan 31st, 2007 - 16:21:36

Ha SP4, I knew I would find you trashing Hillary somewhere.

I think you are either attracked to her or scared of her. What could be worse than the current adminstration, have you ever thought that's why we have so many people running for president? They are thinking that after the horrible job he has done, anyone can look good.

By the way, you are coming off a little gay in your views.

Report this comment

Just like Pee Wee Herman ...Jan 31st, 2007 - 20:09:28

SP4,

re: your comment 'Not every man wants to pop the women in front of him, or at least has the control to manage it effectively'

Control? Is that what you call it when you're 'wankin yourself' to a picture of Ann Coulter?

Report this comment

billJan 31st, 2007 - 21:43:06

what say we de-nut sp4?

Report this comment