Iraq shift seen as Bush's last chance

US Features

By Tony Czuczka Jan 11, 2007, 11:58 GMT

Washington - US President George W Bush's decision to send more than 20,000 extra troops to Iraq in the biggest overhaul of his war strategy so far is a high-stakes gamble that will make or break his presidency, analysts said. Bush's plan, unveiled in a much-anticipated speech Wednesday, faces high hurdles. A majority of Americans oppose the buildup, Democrats who took charge of Congress this month are hostile, and key parts of the strategy depend on Iraqi government cooperation. 'I think this is the last chance for him,' political scientist Stephen Hess told the Cable News Network (CNN). 'He's got only two more years left in his administration.' Veteran leftwing Senator Edward Kennedy this week called Iraq 'George Bush's Vietnam.' He and other Democrats call the more aggressive approach Bush outlined Wednesday an 'escalation' - a word with echoes of the Vietnam era and a war the US eventually lost. More worrisome for Bush is a surge in outspoken criticism from his own centre-right Republican Party, which lost majorities in both houses of Congress in November elections that largely turned on the Iraq war. Hours before Bush addressed the nation from the White House, Republican Senator Norm Coleman spoke out in the upper chamber against a troop increase. 'I just don't believe this makes sense,' he said. Centre-left Democrats, in control of both houses of Congress for the first time in 12 years, have signaled they will confront Bush at every turn as he moves forward on Iraq. Seeking to spur those in his party who fear a popular backlash if they challenge Bush directly, Kennedy is proposing legislation that would require congressional approval for the extra troops. Other Democrats say they may consider withholding money for the buildup. Congressional hearings of top administration officials involved in Iraq policymaking were to start Thursday, fulfilling a Democratic campaign pledge for tough oversight of the war. Republican Senator Gordon Smith, who also broke with Bush over the troop boost, said that the president's speech set up 'a traditional war-powers confrontation' - and sounded like he welcomed the fight. Bush argues that the extra troops, coupled with more US pressure on Iraq's Shiite Muslim Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki to help stop sectarian killings, will provide the critical muscle to stop the cycle of violence, setting the stage for an eventual US pullout without leaving behind a failed state. The plan is 'his last credible opportunity' to set a winning course in Iraq, said Anthony Cordesman of the Washington-based Centre for Strategic and International Studies. Democrats have urged Bush to start a withdrawal within six months, calling it the only way to push Iraqi security forces to take charge of the country. 'We cannot impose a military solution,' said Democratic Senator Barack Obama, a likely presidential contender in 2008. Bush asked Americans for 'more patience, sacrifice and resolve' in 2007 and warned them against the temptation to 'put aside the burdens of freedom.' Some say he may be right to press ahead, even though Americans are disheartened with the war, in which more than 3,000 US troops and tens of thousands of Iraqis have died. 'Pulling out now could turn Iraq into a Rwanda-style genocidal civil war,' said Max Boot, a security analyst at the nonpartisan Council on Foreign Relations. 'My sense is that most Americans recognize this and still want to salvage an acceptable outcome, if possible.' © 2007 dpa - Deutsche Presse-Agentur

Your Talkback on this Story

Note posts made on our older Talkback system will still show below. However, new posts can only be made via the new system (above). We will export the old comments to the new shortly. You can still comment as a guest on the new system but it also allows you to login using various social network and other accounts.

Other features coming soon.

Talkback

page: 1

billyJan 11th, 2007 - 12:37:51

If George is so fired up for this, let his daughters go and live in a hostile community where they would be sitting ducks like the other 21,500 guys and gals will

Report this comment

FrankJan 11th, 2007 - 12:42:03

Did you know that the USA with only 6% of the worlds population uses a staggering 25% of the worlds ANNUAL oil production.
Of course this war is all about control of the major oilfields in Iraq and Iran.
An agreement has just been signed that the USA gets 80% of Iraqs Oil output for the next 30 years. .
I notice yesterday that Bush has given orders to to open up new oilfields in Alaska......Bristol Bay..
in the middle of one of the most enviromentally sensitive areas in the world, home of the worlds rarest whales and sockeye salmon..

Report this comment

Dave AnthonyJan 11th, 2007 - 12:45:56

We can put a million troops into Iraq and give them our entire gross national product and it will not change the reality of the situation. Sunnis and Shiites have been killing each other for centuries and will continue to do so. Unless we are prepared to deal with the source of funding and supplies for the insurgency, then we cannot end the violence. Since no one is prepared to deal with Syria or Iran militarily the violence will go on and on. I salute and pray for our troops each day for what they are trying to do, but their political leadership is serving them poorly. The reckoning is upon us and no one in either party has the moral authority to lead this nation. We have a major crisis on our hands and the Democratic majority takes time to pass a grandstanding bill prohibiting smoking in a room in the capital. God help us.

Report this comment

Drew LawsonJan 11th, 2007 - 12:48:15

I doubt if anyone - apart from the american public - have ever thought that Bush's motives for the Iraq war were anything but oil and money. The only mystery is why the americans themselves can't see it.

Report this comment

drewJan 11th, 2007 - 12:51:02

Bush asked Americans for 'more patience, sacrifice and resolve' in 2007 and warned them against the temptation to 'put aside the burdens of freedom.'

We haven't, that's why we don't believe in warentless wire tapping and many other executive powers during war time.

Report this comment

hutchJan 11th, 2007 - 12:53:25

George's Presidency is already broken.He has fallen so far in grace that he can't recover.The saddest part is the incompetent advice he is getting. Surely the Republican Party could have provided him with more guidance.The Congress should have a vote of confidence or no confidence and he should abide by it.

Report this comment

Barry, IrelandJan 11th, 2007 - 13:02:57

'I am in blood steeped in so far that to return is as tedious as to go o'er'

I sense that these prophetic words of the great Bard rang through in similar fashion for President Bush when faced with choosing one of the two main strategic options.

Report this comment

page: 1

US

Iraq shift seen as Bush's last chance

US Features

Your Talkback on this Story

Talkback

Similar articles

Latest Headlines in US

From Sites We Like

Latest PopEater News

Latest Cinema Blend News

Latest Tech Herald News

In Monsters and Critics

Corporate

The Fine Print