London - The public funds made available to Britain's Prince
Charles rose by 25 per cent to 3 million pounds (4.9 million pounds)
last year, an increase that sparked immediate controversy Tuesday.
While the prince's office defended the increase, commentators
criticized the rise during a time of recession.
Accounts published Tuesday showed that the cost for travel
undertaken by Prince Charles and his wife, the Duchess of Cornwall,
rose by 48 per cent to 1.7 million pounds over the past tax year.
They showed that the prince travelled more than 80,000 kilometres
to attend 658 official engagements during 2008/2009.
However, the bulk of the costs was linked to trips to the Far East
and Latin America, undertaken at the request of the government and
with environmental protection issues high on the agenda.
Charles's private income, derived from his Duchy of Cornwall
estate, increased by 1 per cent to 16.4 million pounds during the
last financial year.
His tax burden decreased by 10 per cent to 3.1 million pounds in
the reporting period.
His spokesman pointed out that the prince's private expenditure
dropped by 23 per cent to 1.7 million pounds, linked to his decision
to cut back on foreign holidays and reduce staff.
Campaign group Republic - which is pressing for abolition of the
monarchy - called on the government to stop funding the prince's
work.
'In the depths of a recession, Prince Charles is obviously quite
capable of making a multi-million pound profit from the Duchy,'
Republic spokesman Graham Smith said.
But Michael Peat, the prince's senior aide, said the rise in
official travel costs was due to two long-haul trips to the Far East
and South America, during which he visited the Galapagos Islands in
March this year.
'It's easy to underestimate the importance and success of these
tours,' he said, adding that Charles was by 'no means immune' to the
recession. 'We are always reviewing all costs the whole time.'
Your Talkback on this Story