South Asia

South Asia News

Dec 3, 2008, 14:51 GMT

India-Pakistan tensions rise over Mumbai attacks


And Also

The Decade: Film's 10 Best Music Moments In The Aughts


Your Talkback on this Story

Similar articles

CIA director Leon Panetta meets Indian officials
FBI chief Robert Mueller meets Indian officials (Roundup)
FBI chief Robert Mueller meets Indian officials
FBI chief Robert Mueller to visit India
ROUNDUP : India-Pakistan tensions rise over Mumbai attacks

Latest Headlines in South Asia

Older Talkback

page: 1 

lanceDec 3rd, 2008 - 19:22:52

Good to hear that India has not bombed Pakistan back to the stone ages. Apparently, mass killing people has not rubbed off onto them from the United States.

Perhaps there is hope for the world after all, but it ain't coming from the U.S.


Report this comment

SP4: Proud to sayDec 3rd, 2008 - 19:39:31

..on this occasion, the USA has nothng to do with any of this in India or raghead land, and if we produce no hope for the world, after freeing
Europe,
whole chunks of Asia,
millions in Iraq from their own totalitarian rulers,
Afghanistan,
protecting sea lanes,
air corridors,
billions in AIDS treatment and cures,
22% of the UN's budget
Huge chunks of the IMF
...or despite the one half trillion dollars per year americans presently spend in doing so, perhaps the rest of the world can get off it's ass and produce some on it's own, or even for us, for a change!

Merry Christmas

By the way, Lance, where's that insightful dissertation on how Bush broke the bank of England??? Bah Humbug!

Report this comment

lanceDec 3rd, 2008 - 19:46:32

Typical response:

We give food and money thus we are allowed to mass kill people.


Report this comment

BR----Raised in New York City-----Dec 3rd, 2008 - 20:09:34



I beg to differ Mr. Lance---The U.S. has not done 'mass killing' (of innocents). Check the accurate History books that will re-define what youre getting at: Hitler, yes, George Bush , No. You read and trust the American Media waaaaay too much, dude.
War was still a better response to Hitlers Germany than APPEASING that bas-ard. Whole countries were raped by him BEFORE the U.S intervened.

Report this comment

lanceDec 3rd, 2008 - 20:15:16

No one from Iraq every harmed anyone in the United States (no more than the 17,000 murders/year that already existed in the U.S. that is). 9/11 had nothing to do with Iraq.

The Iraq war was defined as a preemptive war.

The strategy of mass killing, mass destruction and mass invasion with overwhelming forces without provocation is a concept of the Bush administration.

Comparisons to Hitler are unrealistic. Bush sends jesus-bombs while Hitler sent secular-tanks and infantry. There is a big difference there.

Your comments are just more excuses for getting away with mass killing, mass destruction and mass invasion.

Report this comment

lanceDec 3rd, 2008 - 20:19:56

... well, let me adjust that a bit:

While Hitler was a secularist and then later deity seeking mentally ill person, Germany at the time, and hence the forces Hitler commanded, was a predominantly catholic and christian.

So, while Hitler did not command jesus-bombs, he did command catholic and christian tank and infantry units.


Report this comment

Please Pray!!Dec 3rd, 2008 - 21:08:47

Let us all pray that deadly natural disasters will hopefully wipe out the whole of U.S.A and during the recovery stage, the land will be given back to on its indigenous people ... the America Indians.

God destroy America!
Let us pray night and day!

Report this comment

huh?Dec 4th, 2008 - 00:02:44

pray to who ?

Report this comment

JohnDec 4th, 2008 - 00:02:58

I am afraid that my tax money did actually go to Pakistan and to their military.

An ex military guy was one of the principal trainers of the terrorists.

I feel just terrible that the US keeps supporting Pakistan and that our media keeps saying that Kashmir is about a separatist movement. That is what the terrorists want you to believe. It's like, whose side is the US corporate government on? It is too terrible to think about which is why I guess most Americans just remain in denial.

Kashmir was never Islamic. Never. It has been stolen just like every other country that the Muslims have taken over.

Why are we protecting them? Just because the Saudis are buying our worthless treasuries? Oh and the Communists from brutally oppressive China. They buy our worthless dollar too.

What a mess we are in.

Report this comment

lanceDec 4th, 2008 - 01:34:50

'Kashmir was never Islamic. Never. It has been stolen just like every other country that the Muslims have taken over.'

That is so funny.

You do realize that the United States was originally pagans and was never christian. And that Mexico was never 'Hispanic christians' but were originally pagans. That New Zealand was pagans, Australia was pagan, and most of the world was pagan until taken over by christians. Infact, before 2000 years ago there were no christians and everything was never christian.

So, I wonder. What is your point? Are muslims not allowed to take something over, but christians are allowed to take something over?

Sounds like I caught onto another double standard here. Boy, I could go on for months with this double standard. Lets here more!


Report this comment

SP4: the best part of all thisDec 4th, 2008 - 15:54:42

Pakistan HAS to start capping taliban and Al Qaeda towel heads on their own turf and it has already started! It's hard to believe Al Qaeda made such a mistake. In order to look like they're doing somehting, they now have to make a real effort.

They're doing it all for us! Muslim bombs on Muslims.

Merry Christmas!

Report this comment

page: 1 

From Sites we Like

Police baffled by a string of bizarre cattle mutilations in southern Colorado. Local chupacabras fear they'll be blamed [Strange]
Today's Friday Photo Fun from our pals at TSG is a tough one. What rock band once required a certain "themed" magazine in their concert rider? Contest ends at 6pm Eastern [Amusing]
New study shows that Americans throw away over 40% of the food they purchase, or about 1,400 calories per person per DAY. Or, put another way, enough to give every starving person on this planet the same waistline as the average American [Sick]
More Not News from Fark