Coalition airstrike kills 7 children, investigation started (Roundup)

Kabul - The US-led coalition said Monday that an airstrike in eastern Afghanistan killed seven children and that an investigation was underway in what it said was a case of al-Qaeda using 'innocent civilians to shield themselves.' The strike came Sunday night in Paktika province after the coalition received intelligence of reports of al-Qaeda fighters having set themselves up in a complex which included a mosque and a religious school. US spokesman, Army Major Chris Belcher, said the incident was very regrettable and that an investigation was underway, but he said it was further proof that the al-Qaeda terrorists were using a mosque and civilians as protection. 'This is another example of al-Qaeda using the protective status of a mosque as well as innocent civilians to shield themselves,' he charged. He said that the coalition had received reliable information that al-Qaeda fighters had been in the complex all day. But there had been no indications that civilians were present when the airstrike was ordered on it, the spokesman said. After the attack, local residents confirmed that several al-Qaeda fighters were killed and two others captured. The mosque received minor damage in the strike, the coalition said. In Washington, White House spokesman Tony Snow said Taliban fighters were believed to have used civilians as human shields in the past but that the military was still investigating the incident. 'Obviously, anytime innocents are killed it is a tragedy,' Snow said. 'At this point you also still have to let people do a fuller investigation about what went on.' In further developments, the US military said that there had been heavy fighting overnight in the southern Helmand province after joint Afghan-US units were attacked on Sunday. The military said 'several dozen enemy combatants' had been killed in the fighting in which air cover was brought in to support the troops on the ground. Two coalition troops were wounded. The International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Kabul also reported that one ISAF soldier and two Afghan policemen had been killed and three further coalition soldiers wounded in the central province of Oruzgan. At the same time, a great number of radical-Islamic fighters had been killed in the fighting which had been going on in the region for three days. ISAF did not divulge the identity of the ISAF casualties, but many Dutch soldiers are stationed in the region. Civilian deaths have been a great matter of concern for the US- backed government of President Hamid Karzai. At least a quarter of the 4,000 people killed in fighting in 2006 were civilians, according to reports by human-rights groups. Last week, the International Committee of the Red Cross said the conflict has only worsened this year and civilian casualties were growing. Defence ministers of NATO, to which the US belongs and which leads the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan, vowed Friday to take additional efforts to avoid civilian casualties in Afghanistan. But NATO warned that innocent lives would inevitably be lost in the war between international forces and militants there. Both NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer and Afghan Defence Minister Abdel Rahim Wardak said at the Brussels meeting that international and Afghan forces were doing their best to prevent civilian deaths. But they said insurgents were deliberately targeting civilians and using them as shields and hostages. © 2007 dpa - Deutsche Presse-Agentur

And Also

The Decade: Film's 10 Best Music Moments In The Aughts

The Decade: Film's 10 Best Music Moments In The Aughts - Cinema Blend
GASP: Goldstriker creates world's most expensive iPhone - The Tech Herald
Peter Jackson Looks Lovely at 'Bones' Premiere - PopEater
Chris Rock interview, Sons of Anarchy and Woody Allen shout out for 'Madagascar' star

Your Talkback on this Story

Latest Headlines in South Asia

Older Talkback

page: 1

ObserverJun 18th, 2007 - 17:37:17

Smells like a typical propaganda stunt by the Muslim scum.

Report this comment

Barrington WombleJun 18th, 2007 - 21:40:53

I'm really confused...what is the difference between the ISAF (NATO) coalition, and the US-led coalition? Why is it that whenever something bad happens it's the 'US-led' and otherwise, it's the 'NATO-led'? Isn't Gen. McNeill the first American to command this force, so why wasn't it called the British-led or Italian-led coalition when there were commanders from those countries.

Report this comment

ObserverJun 18th, 2007 - 22:53:52

Barrington,

Its called propaganda, or also known as press these days!

Report this comment

TXSFREDJun 18th, 2007 - 23:08:25

The first time they showed it , I turned my head. It was unconceivable. Jumping from over 1,000 feet into the concrete of New York... But,knowing the main stream media and their commie agendas, I made myself watch the tape of the people preferring to die in contact with concrete from over 1,000 feet for such a day as this. I knew that the cowardly Islamists would hide amongst their children. When I see stories of their children dying from a bomb going astray or more likely just their own cowardise hiding amongst them, I see an American man and woman, who went to work just to do business on 9-11, holding hands to have the courage to jump from over 1000 feet...nothing else...Got that, mainstream media?...

Report this comment

Joe in CAJun 19th, 2007 - 02:21:52

'Using children to shield themselves?'

Shield themselves from what? Oh you mean, like so that the US will look bad when we bomb them?

Kinda like how Muslims looked bad when they bombed the twin towers, and we've been using the 9/11 excuse from here to breakfast to justify whatever we do?

So like whenever our side has casualties, they're not 'shields.' It's 'oh our poor soldiers died. RETRIBUTION!'

But when the other side loses casualties, they are.

That has got to be the biggest crock I've ever heard spewed forth by proponents of the current invasion and occupation of the Middle East.

I guess you must say whatever you have to to clear you conscience...

A war is a war. 'Shields' or not you killed 7 innoscent children is what it comes right down to. Live with it.

Just remember. We fired first. There was never any strike or actions against us. The countries we bomb can't ALL be responsible for 9/11, and eventually, you're just going to have to get over it and move on. Learn from your mistakes. Instead of using a terrorist attack as an excuse to bomb everyone, instead of wasting money on an effort that JUST ISN'T WORKING, you could be spending money to say, SEAL OUR BORDERS, INCREASE SECURITY, and help AT HOME.

The recent VT, New Jersey and JFK incidents only go to show us that the 'War on Terror' has not made this nation any 'safer;' we're about as wide open as when we were back in 9/11/2001.

How long do you have to kick a horse before you realize it's dead?

'Fighting for peace is like fcuking for virginity...'

Report this comment

page: 1

South Asia

South Asia News

Coalition airstrike kills 7 children, investigation started (Roundup)

And Also

Your Talkback on this Story

Similar articles

Latest Headlines in South Asia

Older Talkback

From Sites we Like

In Monsters and Critics

Corporate

The Fine Print