ObserverJun 18th, 2007 - 17:37:17

Smells like a typical propaganda stunt by the Muslim scum.

Report this comment

Barrington WombleJun 18th, 2007 - 21:40:53

I'm really confused...what is the difference between the ISAF (NATO) coalition, and the US-led coalition? Why is it that whenever something bad happens it's the 'US-led' and otherwise, it's the 'NATO-led'? Isn't Gen. McNeill the first American to command this force, so why wasn't it called the British-led or Italian-led coalition when there were commanders from those countries.

Report this comment

ObserverJun 18th, 2007 - 22:53:52

Barrington,

Its called propaganda, or also known as press these days!

Report this comment

TXSFREDJun 18th, 2007 - 23:08:25

The first time they showed it , I turned my head. It was unconceivable. Jumping from over 1,000 feet into the concrete of New York... But,knowing the main stream media and their commie agendas, I made myself watch the tape of the people preferring to die in contact with concrete from over 1,000 feet for such a day as this. I knew that the cowardly Islamists would hide amongst their children. When I see stories of their children dying from a bomb going astray or more likely just their own cowardise hiding amongst them, I see an American man and woman, who went to work just to do business on 9-11, holding hands to have the courage to jump from over 1000 feet...nothing else...Got that, mainstream media?...

Report this comment

Joe in CAJun 19th, 2007 - 02:21:52

'Using children to shield themselves?'

Shield themselves from what? Oh you mean, like so that the US will look bad when we bomb them?

Kinda like how Muslims looked bad when they bombed the twin towers, and we've been using the 9/11 excuse from here to breakfast to justify whatever we do?

So like whenever our side has casualties, they're not 'shields.' It's 'oh our poor soldiers died. RETRIBUTION!'

But when the other side loses casualties, they are.

That has got to be the biggest crock I've ever heard spewed forth by proponents of the current invasion and occupation of the Middle East.

I guess you must say whatever you have to to clear you conscience...

A war is a war. 'Shields' or not you killed 7 innoscent children is what it comes right down to. Live with it.

Just remember. We fired first. There was never any strike or actions against us. The countries we bomb can't ALL be responsible for 9/11, and eventually, you're just going to have to get over it and move on. Learn from your mistakes. Instead of using a terrorist attack as an excuse to bomb everyone, instead of wasting money on an effort that JUST ISN'T WORKING, you could be spending money to say, SEAL OUR BORDERS, INCREASE SECURITY, and help AT HOME.

The recent VT, New Jersey and JFK incidents only go to show us that the 'War on Terror' has not made this nation any 'safer;' we're about as wide open as when we were back in 9/11/2001.

How long do you have to kick a horse before you realize it's dead?

'Fighting for peace is like fcuking for virginity...'

Report this comment