Iraq dissatisfied with US reply on security pact, says official

Middle East News

Nov 11, 2008, 10:34 GMT

Baghdad - Iraq on Tuesday expressed its dissatisfaction with the US reply to amendments of the security agreement that will regulate the future of US forces in Iraq, according to an Iraqi government spokesperson. Ali al-Dabbagh said that the US reply to the amendments 'is not satisfactory' and that 'Iraqis are not going to accept' it. 'The US reply to the Iraqi amendments is not satisfactory and there are many points that still need clarification and amendment,' al-Dabbagh said in an interview with the London-based Asharq al-Awsat newspaper. Al-Dabbagh added that it is therefore unlikely that the Iraqi parliament will discuss the reply in its next session. Iraq last Thursday received Washington's reply on amendments it made to the agreement. The Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) will govern the future of US troops in Iraq after the UN mandate expires at the end of 2008. Iraqi and Arab media had previously said that the US had agreed to three out of the five amendments that Iraq made to the agreement. Although both parties had agreed in mid-October that the last draft was final, last week the Iraqi government had handed the US embassy in Baghdad an amended draft. Among the disputed points in the agreement is the immunity of the US troops in Iraq. Iraq said that US troops who commit crimes off duty should be judged according to Iraqi law, as against the US position that they would be tried by US justice authorities. Baghdad also aims to seal an agreement with Britain to decide on the future of the 4,100 British troops stationed in Iraq.

Your Talkback on this Story

Note posts made on our older Talkback system will still show below. However, new posts can only be made via the new system (above). We will export the old comments to the new shortly. You can still comment as a guest on the new system but it also allows you to login using various social network and other accounts.

Other features coming soon.

Talkback

page: 1

Down the RoadNov 11th, 2008 - 12:10:57

RE: Among the disputed points in the agreement is the immunity of the US troops in Iraq.

Ahhh, herein lies the difference: Iraqi justice will always be separate and foreign to American justice. The cultures have too many opposing views. Good luck in the future.

Report this comment

BillNov 13th, 2008 - 03:37:45

If Iraq doesn't agree to America's terms, then fine. Bring our troops home January 1st. We'll see if Iraq can agree to al qaeda's terms when we leave.

Report this comment

DhegNov 13th, 2008 - 04:11:09

Looks to me like the Iraqis have the Bush administration over a barrel. I think the Iraqis would be very happy to let the next 1 1/2 months pass by without a SOFA in place. Come Jan 1, after the UN mandate expires, the Iraqis can simply say, US out. Bush/Cheney have no recourse other than covert or other illegal means to say in the country. Bush/Cheney have to walk away with nothing to show for all of the pain they have caused. IMHO, that's good. The Iraqis have not signed any PSAs, nothin'. Bush/Cheney sure screwed up their end game.

Report this comment

page: 1

Middle East

Iraq dissatisfied with US reply on security pact, says official

Middle East News

Your Talkback on this Story

Talkback

Similar articles

Latest Headlines in Middle East

From Sites We Like

Latest PopEater News

Latest Cinema Blend News

Latest Tech Herald News

In Monsters and Critics

Corporate

The Fine Print