Middle East

Ahmadinejad in New York amid protests, US election controversy

Middle East News

Sep 22, 2008, 23:36 GMT


Your Talkback on this Story

Note posts made on our older Talkback system will still show below. However, new posts can only be made via the new system (above). We will export the old comments to the new shortly. You can still comment as a guest on the new system but it also allows you to login using various social network and other accounts.

Other features coming soon.

Talkback

page: 1 

Past, Present, FutureSep 23rd, 2008 - 07:53:42

The Jews were once slaves to the Egyptians. What does that matter if relations are better in this day and age? The past does not speak for the present and the present does not speak for the future. Presently, the leader of Iran sees America and Israel as enemies to be destroyed and that is enough for just protests.

Report this comment

margeSep 23rd, 2008 - 08:00:52

What a joke, the World Jewish Congress is calling President Ahmadinejad racist. People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Anyway, Ronald Lauder must have confused Iran with Israel, for Israel is the most racist country in the Middle East, and the only country with an occupation and engaged in genocide. Israel divides the people living within its borders with segregation laws and apartheid walls. Iran does none of this and treats the people living within its borders with equality. Israel is the country that the World Jewish Congress should be protesting against. Israel should be treated no different than other countries that commits human rights violations and war crimes against a people.

Report this comment

R LafontaineSep 23rd, 2008 - 17:12:55

I find it rather strange that people rant and rave about Ahmedinejad while he talks calmly and politely, and then they call him a fanatic. He has never threatened to destroy Israel or USA. That is simply distortion and/or fabrication of the hysteria mongers. There is no proof whatsoever that Iran wants to make a nuclear bomb. Those with nuclear bombs of their own should look in the mirror sometime. An attack against Iran would kill millions of innocent Iranians, and yes, Iranians are innocent just as Americans and Israelis can be considered innocent though they have elected fanatics and tyrants to high office. Thus far Iran has attacked no one, invaded no country and is being besieged and attacked by forces sponsored and promoted by US and Israel. Terrorists in other words.

Report this comment

James JohnsonSep 23rd, 2008 - 20:51:11

Ahmadinejad is a dictator! What a thoughtless statement. How could someone who was elected by popular votes (unlike George Bush)be a dictator? King Abodullah of Jordan, King Fahad of Saudi Arabia, Housni Mobarak of Egypt, Haj Mohamad of UAE, Ruller of Qatar that incidentally all are US Allies, may be called dictators but not Ahmadinejad. The only thing Ahmadinejad can be labeled is that he is against opression and has the guts to stand up against opressors and corrupt leaders who are the real danger to the wolrd peace.

Report this comment

FrancsecoSep 23rd, 2008 - 21:31:15

Hi,

Two weeks after John Kenedy Announced that no country in middle east is allowed to have atomic weapons he was dead and we became Israeli popet. That is why we attacked Iraq and we will attack Iran. No one can be elected in this country without Israeli permission.

Thanks
Francesco

Report this comment

No Thank YouSep 29th, 2008 - 09:39:24

We are no one's puppets, we can elect anyone of our choosing, we strive to curb corruption, we are always needing to protect our rights.

To lash out at a particular people is a moral injustice, and such comments do not merit the good intentions of free speech. This country does not want to create puppets, this country sees the condition of others who are under oppression and tries to fight against the atrocities that often accompany dictatorial rule.

You, if you do, have a right to choose to live under barbaric practices, or to live for a better day for your peoples. No law or government entity will have the perfect solution for a better quality of life for all. Yet, that kind of life is the ideal that all reasonable folk ever hope to achieve.

In parting, I know that sides will be taken, arms will be proliferating, and various factions will decimate a lot of peoples' dreams. Our futures depends on the right people making the right decisions.

Respectfully,
One Amongst Many

Report this comment

TazchiMay 8th, 2009 - 16:45:46

Marge, you may be the most ignorant person in the history of humanity. Have you ever been to Israel? Have you ever been to Iran? Do you even know what the word 'genocide' means. From your comment, my guess is that the answers to all of the above questions are no.



Report this comment

page: 1 

Similar articles

Ahmadinejad defiant against pro-Israel lobby ahead of UN visit
Ahmadinejad to go to UN General Assembly, seeks Obama debate (Roundup)
Ahmadinejad to go to New York for UN General Assembly

Latest Headlines in Middle East

Bookmark and Share Share

From Sites We Like

Latest PopEater News

Taylor Swift Mocks Kate Gosselin, Kanye and Joe Jonas on 'SNL'
Susan Boyle Coming to 'Dancing With The Stars'
Ten Celebrities Who Need To Join Twitter
Lamar Wants Khloe Kardashian Pregnant
PopEater Poll Results: How You Voted on Rihanna, Mariah, Anderson and Taylor

Latest Cinema Blend News

Lawrence and Foxx Resurrect Sheneneh And Wanda
The Slammin' Salmon Trailer: Broken Lizard Serves Up Funny
Moon Director Brings Jake Gyllenhaal Source Code
Weekend Box Office - Christmas Comes Early... Again
Joe Johnston Talks Jurassic Park 4

Latest Tech Herald News

Shamed Brit cop busted for stealing videogames
RTFM: Jailbroken iPhones get iRickrolled due to weak SSH access
Review: Motorola Droid
Facebook settlement means little in the long run
Naked Windows 7 vulnerable to Malware if left in default state
USA