Middle East

Report: Iran to install 54,000 centrifuges (Roundup)

Middle East News

Aug 29, 2008, 12:18 GMT


Your Talkback on this Story

Note posts made on our older Talkback system will still show below. However, new posts can only be made via the new system (above). We will export the old comments to the new shortly. You can still comment as a guest on the new system but it also allows you to login using various social network and other accounts.

Other features coming soon.

Talkback

page: 1 

James LostAug 30th, 2008 - 06:22:02

Something really stiniks here!The powers that be,nuclear powers that is,do not want Iran to join their ranks.Iran with plans for 50,000 plus centerfuges is obviously not adhering to the demands of these powers.Now the last time I checked Iran was much like Russia and pursumally China,an independent,soverieghn nation,thus the Iranians have only a moral obligation not to pursue nuclear armanet,not a legal mandate.I personaly do not like the idea of a nuclear Iran,but hey ,if the political cesspools of Pakistan,North Korea and India has a right to nukes,why should Iran be denied such a right? Could it be that the recent privitisation of Iranian economic sectors by non US corperate interests have angered the powers that be? Is it possible that cetain western economic powers have at some point in recent history orderd Iran to sell to them or be bombed?Why would other substatial economic giants invest in a country on the verge of being returned to the stone age?
I will dare awnswer my own quiz and risk exposing my ignorance of world affairs.Could it be that the non US investors are non American in name only? A nations economic infrastructure can after war,be rebuilt.The rebuilders of that economic machinery stand to make enormous profits from such undertakings.Could it be that the investors,the rebuilders and the potential aggressors are actualy the same powers? While material infrastructure can be rebuilt,human beings ,once dead ,can not.amongst the dead humans,if Iran were to be attacked would be anyone who stands oppossed to the privitisation of Iranian resources and industry.Also among the dead would be a sizable number of so called'' useless eaters''or heaven forbid, members of the general population who could potentialy cause disruption in the plans of the powers that be;darn,for some reason I keep wanting to refer to those powers that be as the New World Order !Why on earth would I be prone to such a fallicy when there is nothing new about powerfull,wealthy well armed forces ruling over and destroying smaller,less monnied and inferiorly armed segments of the population?
At any rate,something about this intire affair really stinks!

Report this comment

page: 1 

Similar articles

Iran is still studying UN nuclear fuel deal, says lawmaker
Iran's supreme leader raises red flag about talks with US
Iran wants to purchase uranium for Tehran reactor, envoy says
Iran to review UN nuclear deal for enrichment in Russia, France
Lawmaker says Tehran reactor to be shut down

Latest Headlines in Middle East

Bookmark and Share Share

From Sites We Like

Latest PopEater News

Usher's Marriage to Tameka Foster Officially Over
LaToya Jackson Scene From 'Bruno' Restored for DVD
Chris Brown: Rihanna Attack Should Be a 'Private Matter'
Believe It or Not? Here Are the Week's Hottest Headlines
Chris Brown Is Having One Rough Week

Latest Cinema Blend News

Joe Johnston Talks Jurassic Park 4
Gwyneth Paltrow Stands By Her Man: Nicole Kidman
Eminem Returns To The Big Screen In Shady Tales
The Killer Inside Me Trailer: Casey Affleck Has Issues
First Twilight Eclipse Teaser Poster

Latest Tech Herald News

Review: Motorola Droid
Facebook settlement means little in the long run
Naked Windows 7 vulnerable to Malware if left in default state
Adobe patches Shockwave Player
SSL flaw allows man-in-the-middle attacks
USA