ANALYSIS: Elections in Iran - Referendum for changes

Middle East News

Mar 7, 2008, 2:08 GMT

Tehran - After more than 30 months of the presidency of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iranians will show in next week's parliamentary elections whether they still support the presidential course or rather vote for changes. The March 14 elections will, in effect, be a pro- or contra- Ahmadinejad referendum. More than 43.7 million Iranians over the age of 18 are eligible to vote for more than 4,440 candidates vying for 290 seats. The 30 seats in Tehran are politically the most important, as in the provinces technical rather than political aspects are considered. 'If the silent majority, which did not attend the elections last time (2004), attend the polls this time, the presidential camp will be in trouble,' said former vice-president Mohammad-Ali ABtahi. Observers believe that a high turnout will benefit Ahmadinejad's opponents, who have called on the people not to remain ignorant of what the elections mean. 'If you keep your voice just for yourself, nothing will ever change,' former president Mohammad Khatami said. There are three main factions - the pro-Ahmadinejad camp, the reformist opposition, and a new conservative faction which has emerged as an alternative to these two. The Ahmadinejad camp consists mainly of of the faction which had in the last four years has formed the legislative majority. Top candidate is Parliament Speaker Gholam-Hossein Hadad-Adel. The reformists have formed a coalition led by ex-presidents Khatami and Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani. Most of their candidates have, however, been disqualified for ideological reasons by the senate-like Guardian Council. So they have no top candidate, and would be more than happy to win even one-third of the seats. Another reformist faction running in the elections is the Etemad Melli party led by former parliament speaker Mehdi Karrubi who is close to Khatami. Observers have, however, focused on the new conservative faction led by former chief nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani. Last October he resigned from his post owing to differences with Ahmadinejad over the president's uncompromising nuclear policies. The new faction, also supported by Tehran Mayor Mohammad-Baqer Qalibaf, is loyal to the system, but unlike Ahmadinejad follows a more moderate course. 'The criteria of the voters have changed - the economic crisis has made the economy the main issue, and even political considerations tend towards that direction,' a political expert in Tehran said. Despite high oil prices, it is inflation - ranging between 20 to 30 per cent - that remains people's main problem. 'With the high oil prices we could have golden years - but Ahmadinejad and his people have succeeded in turning gold into recession,' said reformer Hossein Marashi. Meanwhile Iranian foreign policy - including the nuclear dispute and Ahmadinejad's anti-Semitic rhetoric - have in the last two years harmed the country. 'Unnecessary and totally irrelevant remarks (on Israel) have brought the country to the edge of international isolation,' said the spokesman of the reformist coalition, Abollah Nasseri. 'Three UN resolutions (against Iran in connection with the nuclear dispute) are the achievements of this government. Somebody must control this downward trend.' The Iranians are, however, fed up with the political quarrels between reformists and conservatives over foreign, social, cultural and economic policies. 'Ideological quarrels will not help the people - what we have to do is solve their problems,' Karrubi said. Observers grant the new conservative camp - especially as it is supported by the country's clergy as well - better chances than reformists for confronting the Ahmadinejad camp.

Your Talkback on this Story

Note posts made on our older Talkback system will still show below. However, new posts can only be made via the new system (above). We will export the old comments to the new shortly. You can still comment as a guest on the new system but it also allows you to login using various social network and other accounts.

Other features coming soon.

Talkback

page: 1

GooseMar 7th, 2008 - 03:58:39

Elections in Iran? hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.....sniff. It does not matter who you 'elect' the real leaders don't change..too funny. Seig Heil.

Report this comment

kabeer azmaliyaMar 7th, 2008 - 17:00:00

The issue shown in Iran that a tussle between the orthodox and the reformists,are actually a whitewash and a total lie,there are thousands and thousands of evidences to substantiate that the so called orthodox are actually Anti Islam, and the real followers of Islam are labelled as reformist so that the iranian masses donot vote them to power and drive out the Anti Islamic forces out of Iran.
What even the family of khomeini is anti Islam that they were denied to contest elections,since last past five years under the present leader ship, Iran has created an uncertainity in the region.Show an example of constructive work done for Islam.

Report this comment

IranianMar 7th, 2008 - 20:01:24

We support our government regardless of what you read here. This is of course music to the ears for some people but not for us Iranians. It's just propaganda. Old fashion propaganda. They have done it since 1979 and every time the result is exactly the opposite of what they had calculated. The answer to your question is that Iran is the only country that support the Palestinians and that's why we have had so many problems. It's not about the democracy. It's about being a part of the US-Cancer cell (Israel)hegemony.

Report this comment

page: 1

Middle East

ANALYSIS: Elections in Iran - Referendum for changes

Middle East News

Your Talkback on this Story

Talkback

Similar articles

Latest Headlines in Middle East

From Sites We Like

Latest PopEater News

Latest Cinema Blend News

Latest Tech Herald News

In Monsters and Critics

Corporate

The Fine Print