CharlesJan 28th, 2008 - 20:36:45

That makes perfect sense.

Islamic terrorists sponsored by arab governments murder civilians and assassinate political leaders, and then their political wings blame Bush.

Me thinks this tune is a bit over played.

Report this comment

I say....Jan 29th, 2008 - 01:07:29

PoppyCock to the Islamic Action Front (IAF. What a bunch of old farts.

Report this comment

JqWJan 29th, 2008 - 09:34:16

They are entirely right. The unwarranted an unwanted interference of the US in other country's affairs is the second biggest problem the world faces at the moment (the first is also their fault). Most people in the world understand this, and that is the reason the US is no longer in ascension, and will eventually and rather quickly end up as a footnote to history. That is, if they don't manage to succeed in destroying us all first.

Report this comment

georgeJan 29th, 2008 - 11:59:45

They are right. US has been responsible for the situation in Lebanon.
They would support 'democracy' only when it can control it. If it can not
control 'democratic' process, then it put blame on the 'danger' of 'islamist' coming to power.
On the other hand, the US will use 'Islamists' when it is in its interest as in Chechnya (to undermine Russia) or Saudi Arabia (to get oil).

Report this comment

CharlesJan 29th, 2008 - 14:54:05

That's really brilliant anaylsis people.

But please explain how terrorists and the regimes that sponsor them, who plan and execute political assassinations, are not to blame for the murder and mayhem they cause.

I'm just not getting that part of your argument.

I agree that the US is the source of all evil in the world - but what is the mechanism of control that makes the US responsible for say... the actions of Hezbollah murderers and their Syrain sponsors?

Report this comment