Baghdad/Washington - The success of Saturday's landmark
international meeting to discuss Iraq's future security can only be
measured by events 'on the ground,' US Ambassador to Baghdad Zalmay
Khalilzad said.
In a telephone news conference after the 10-hour meeting of Iraq's
neighbours and major United Nations powers, Kahlilzad termed the
atmosphere as 'constructive and business-like,' but said the United
States and Iraq had made it clear that the movement of foreign
fighters and munitions from Iran and Syria must stop for national
reconciliation within Iraq to be possible.
'We will have to wait and see what happens on the ground, whether
they stop shipping the EFPs (explosively formed penetrators) ... and
stop financial support and training for the militias,' Khalilzad
said.
The US has charged that Iran produces the EFPs for use in roadside
bombs that target civilians and US and Iraqi forces alike. On
Saturday alone, at least 20 people were killed in the predominantly
Shiite Baghdad suburb of Sadr City, and mortars fell close to the
Foreign Ministry headquarters where the leaders of 13 countries and
three international organizations were meeting.
A key focus of international interest was the possibility that the
United States would have direct contact with Iran and Syria.
Khalilzad described in detail how he was introduced by Iraqi Prime
Minsiter Nuri al-Maliki's national security advisor to the Iranian
delegates, with whom he 'walked together and exchanged pleasantries'
as they waited for the conference to begin. There was more contact
'upstairs' during small, group discussions.
Conversations with the Syrians were 'longer than with the Iranians
by a couple of minutes,' Khalilzad said, but there were no private
bilateral talks with either country.
'They are willing to be engaged bilaterally as well as
multilaterally,' Khalilzad said. He said the Syrians 'even offered
bridging formulas for narrowing differences between various parties.'
The US-led invasion of Iraq four years ago provoked insurgency by
Sunni militants, some of whom were angered by the ouster of Saddam
Hussein, who had kept the Shiite majority largely out of government
for decades.
Now, Maliki's Shiite-dominated government is fighting infiltration
by foreign guerrillas and terrorists and escalating violence between
Shiite and Sunni Muslims.
Iraq and Iran are the bastions of the Shiite branch of Islam,
while most of the rest of the Middle East is dominated by Sunnis.
Khalilzad said he was 'cautious about exaggerating' the impact of
the meeting, 'but what has happened cannot be dismissed. It was a
good meeting.'
'The overall mood was business-like and constructive. ... Nobody
was pounding the tables. The exchanges were quite ordinary (with)
frank and sometimes jovial exchanges,' he said.
The conference - the first such major gathering in Iraq - included
representatives of the United Nations, the Arab League and the
Organization of Islamic Conference, as well as diplomats from
Bahrain, Egypt, Iran, Jordan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Syria and Turkey.
The five veto-wielding UN Security Council permanent members - the
US, Britain, France, China and Russia - were also represented.
The group agreed to raise the next meeting, possibly in April, to
a ministerial gathering, meaning that US Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice could 'meet across the tables' with ministers from
Syria and Iran, Khalilzad said.
The next venue was left open, to be decided among the ministers,
but it most likely will not be in Baghdad, the ambassador indicated.
Turkey offered to host the gathering in Istanbul, and Cairo was
also discussed. The G8 group of dominant world economic powers -
which includes Germany, Japan, Canada and Italy - 'have shown
interest in joining' the next discussions, Khalilzad said.
Working groups for three areas - border security, energy and
electricity, and refugees - were to be formed, the representatives
agreed. Most of the differences at the conference centred on when and
how those groups are to be set up, and what countries should be
included.
Iran complained that the US was holding a handful of its
diplomats, suspected by Iraq and the US of being intelligence agents
helping the inflow of weapons and militia into Iraq.
'We responded that the people we are holding have not been
established to be diplomats by the Iraqis or by us,' Khalilzad said.
© 2007 dpa - Deutsche Presse-Agentur 
kalilzadMar 11th, 2007 - 04:09:30
This man is taliban himself, and that is why fascist has appointed him ambassador in iraq. His success is if Iraq gets divided into three parts. These people like their counterparts in nonmuslims are nothing but double faced individuals. I do not believe what he says.
Report this comment