Middle East

Middle East News

Jan 23, 2007, 21:30 GMT

Ahmadinejad rejects possibility of feared US attack against Iran


And Also

Look Back at the Worst Celebrity Breakups


Your Talkback on this Story

Similar articles

US tricking Tehran with nuclear deal, parliament chief says
Ahmadinejad: Iran to go its way despite Western warnings
US prepared to move with sanctions on Iran
Obama warns US patience with Iran is limited (Roundup)
Obama warns US patience with Iran is limited

Latest Headlines in Middle East


Via BuzzFeed

Older Talkback

page: 1 

What, me worry?Jan 24th, 2007 - 00:17:38

'The US is neither in a position nor does it have the capability to attack Iran'

See folks, nothing to worry about.

'What can one carrier do? Iran is not just a spot in the region to be destroyed by a carrier,' the president said.'

See folks, he has a firm grip on reality, nothing to fear here! Who's worried? Not Mahmoud! The hidden Imam will come to the rescue!

(Stennis and Ike, the 2 carrier task forces deployed EACH have MORE firepower then the entire amount of munitions used in all theaters of combat throughout WW2, including the 2 atomic bombs.)

'Asked by a reporter whether he was 'not worried about the future of the country,' Ahmadinejad replied: 'No, I am really not worried.''

What is there to be worried about? All this worry, it causes wrinkles and indigestion. Nothing to see here folks, show 's over, go home. Move along...

'We have never been after using force because we are a country of dialogue and logic,' Ahmadinejad said.'

See! he is completely grounded in reality, so why would anyone worry?

Report this comment

LRRP U.S.ARMYJan 24th, 2007 - 17:50:58

I wish some terroeistis from Iran would come down my street,iam not worried thought

Report this comment

CassandracomplexJan 25th, 2007 - 23:43:09

Like a poke in the eye with a sharp stick, the Chinese just proved they can prevent US spy-satellite intelligence systems from sustaining a non-ground war.

That was huge.

So now Israel would launch a nuclear attack at much greater peril, and the US would have to be willing to end up waging a ground war that they plainly can't afford. Nor would they ever be able to garner either domestic or international support for such an offensive.

'What me worry?' might actually be an appropriate posture.

Bush would totally have to abandon the fig leaf of US domestic democracy and make such a war as a completely totalitarian act.

Report this comment

LRRPFeb 22nd, 2007 - 20:31:12

Don't worrie about China there are not let there country be destroyed by a couple hundred nukes.Ahmadinadummy is very brave so he can leed his people to there death,but where will he be hideing out?????

Report this comment

I was being sarcastic. I am worried.Feb 27th, 2007 - 05:35:47

'Like a poke in the eye with a sharp stick, the Chinese just proved they can prevent US spy-satellite intelligence systems from sustaining a non-ground war. '

No, that is not what they proved at all. They proved that they could make a mess in orbit, that is about it. Seriously, trust me on that one thing.

''What me worry?' might actually be an appropriate posture.'

If you bury your head in the sand they will soon bury your ass there too.

Report this comment

page: 1 

From Sites we Like

Ready-for-Fark headline: "Drive-by gooseing in North Mankato park" [Dumbass]
Man tells cops he's wearing nylons and making sexual gestures to passing vehicles because the meth messed with his hormones [Strange]
More Not News from Fark