Authors Saviano, Rushdie say free speech under threat (News Feature)

Europe Features

By Lennart Simonsson Nov 26, 2008, 7:57 GMT

Stockholm - Freedom of speech is under threat worldwide Italian author Roberto Saviano and British author Salman Rushdie said late Tuesday at a lecture organized by the Swedish Academy. Journalists and writers in countries ranging from China to Mexico to Zimbabwe are under threat, they said, reminding the audience of the murder of investigative journalist Anna Politkovskaya in Russia. Saviano and Rushdie were invited to Stockholm by the Swedish Academy that selects the Nobel literature prize winner. Both also shared their own experiences of living under death threats. In 1989, the academy was deeply divided over how to respond to the death threat issued by Iran's religious leader Ayatollah Khomeini against Rushdie over his novel The Satanic Verses that was labelled as blasphemous. Two of the 18 members, who are appointed for life, gave up active work to protest the academy's decision not to sign an appeal condemning the death threat along with other freedom of speech groups. One of the former members, author Kerstin Ekman, told Deutsche Presse-Agentur dpa after the lecture that she welcomed the initiative to host the two authors and admired them for having been able to 'keep their sense of humour.' Some 450 people attended the discussion held at The Grand Hall of the Swedish Academy's headquarters located in Stockholm's Old Town. Before entering the 18th century building, visitors had to present proof of identification and a special invitation card. Security guards were posted around the podium throughout the presentations. Saviano's book, Gomorra, has triggered death threats by the mafia, or Camorra, in Naples as he had named members of the criminal gangs that cash in on illegal dealings. Writing was a 'form of resistance,' Saviano said. Horace Engdahl, permanent secretary of the Swedish Academy, described Saviano's book was 'a fine specimen of witness literature.' The 'globalization of menace' meant that there was need for more joint efforts to protect freedom of speech and writers, Engdahl said. In their remarks, both Saviano - speaking in Italian - and Rushdie touched on their reactions of anger and sorrow over allegations that they had sought 'the limelight', or in Saviano's case, had wanted to 'vilify my own country' over their writings. Saviano said his initial response when he learned of the threats against him were that it was 'unjust'. 'Your own words have taken away your freedom, your freedom to walk, to exist,' he said. Rushdie recalled an earlier meeting with Saviano in New York and told the audience, including a handful of members of the Swedish Academy, the Italian ambassador to Sweden and publishers, how his years with police protection had enabled him to immediately 'spot police officers' in hotel lobbies and other public spaces. Writers living under death threats also had to struggle with 'how to lead a life,' Rushdie said, noting how practical details like booking an airline ticket or finding a secure house took up a lot of time. Rushdie said he feared there was 'a narrowing of boundaries' about what was allowed to be said or discussed in the public domain. Italian ambassador Anna Della Croce Brigante Colonna told dpa that she hoped the discussion and public awareness would help Saviano and Rushdie. On Wednesday a movie based on Saviano's book was to be screened at the ongoing Stockholm Film Festival.

Talkback

Add your comment (no registration required)

page: 1

Never Give InNov 26th, 2008 - 09:41:36

These men represent some of the best the human race has to offer in the arts and the fight for various freedoms, especially from those who would rule with the cruelest intentions.

Report this comment

Fool on the hillNov 26th, 2008 - 16:02:54

Supression of the freedom of speech is the first step on the road to disaster. If you don't believe me look at the state of the World.

Report this comment

ImportantNov 27th, 2008 - 08:10:27

I'm glad someone is finally pointing out the fact that there has been a censorship of the truth. Whether it's the radical muslims crappin' a brick over a cartoon, or the mafia, or the secularists freaking out about anything christian. Everyone is so freakin' uptight these days that you can't say anything. Just because something is politically correct doesn't mean it is correct... many a time it is the contrary.

Report this comment

SP4: The hardest part about free speechNov 27th, 2008 - 15:18:27

...is defending someone you disagree with.

Rush Limbaugh is a very good example of this. The left in America has tried to silence him for years. National Public Television has run cut throat stories on Limbaugh, Gingrich and others to accomplish these same goals. Liberal congressmen have pilloried Rupert Murdoch for his media's seeming lean to the right, but leave Disney and General Electric alone. They'v eeven floated the idea of financial assistance to failing newspapers, most of which are liberal bastions.

Now, they are pimping 'Fairness Doctrine' a plan to have differing opinion on the same shows, in order to prop up failing liberal newspapers and teleivision networks and undermine the free speech of the conservative radio shows.

It is an insidious way of pulling dissent out of the public's view. Free speech is nat guarenteed speech.

Report this comment

page: 1

Add your comment (no registration required)

Europe

Authors Saviano, Rushdie say free speech under threat (News Feature)

Europe Features

Talkback

Similar articles

Latest Headlines in Europe

Latest Articles on The Tech Herald

In Monsters and Critics

Corporate

The Fine Print