Congo dreams of world's biggest hydroelectric dam

Energy Features

By Ulrike Koltermann Dec 8, 2006, 3:14 GMT

Inga - In the darkness, majestic and sombre, the Inga hydropower station resembles the Colosseum. But Rome's ancient arena is just 50 metres high, ten fewer than the facility in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Inga's walls hold back huge amounts of water diverted from the Congo, Africa's largest river in terms of watershed and second-longest after the Nile. Some of the water roars down penstocks with diametres of more than five metres into the powerhouse, where turbines with rotors weighing 250 tons convert the water power into electricity. The Congolese government and foreign investors are dreaming of damming the entire Congo River and supplying all of Africa with the electricity that it generates. Environmentalists, meanwhile, fear that the 50-billion-dollar project would have drastic ecological and social consequences. Currently, the hydropower station consists of two large dams - Inga I and Inga II, Inga being a nearby village - not far from Matadi. The port city lies some 400 kilometres southwest of Kinshasa, the capital, and about 100 kilometres from the Congo's mouth on the Atlantic Ocean. The Kinshasa-Matadi road is one of the few that are paved in the country which is the size of Western Europe. Inga I and Inga II block a relatively small channel of the Congo, which is so broad at this spot that the river's bank and direction of its flow are difficult to discern. Here it looks more like a huge flood plain. Numerous rocky islands, covered with trees and bushes, protrude from yellow-brown water that bubbles and foams at the countless rapids. Inga I was built in the early 1970s, Inga II in the early 1980s. Both date from the rule of megalomaniac Congolese dictator Mobutu Sese Seko. They were designed to generate 1,775 megawatts of electricity together. However, the facilities were not properly maintained during the civil war that ravaged the country in the late 1990s. The reservoir badly needs to be dredged and the turbines freed from silt. Electricity generation is currently a little under 700 megawatts. That is more than the country needs because only about 6 per cent of the population has access to the power grid. In many rural areas, cooking is done on open fires or with gas. Petroleum lamps provide light. People who can afford it have a diesel generator. Even in Kinshasa, power outages are so common that the rattling of power generators is a familiar sound. Electricity that has no takers at home is exported to the Congo Republic, Zimbabwe and Angola. Just eight of the Inga station's 14 turbines are now in operation. The Stuttgart-based engineering concern Fichtner has drawn up a 550- million-dollar renovation plan, co-funded by the World Bank, for SNEL, the national electricity company. MagEnergy of Canada has begun repairs on four turbines. It is funding the work itself and will share in revenues from the station's electricity sales. This is the method eyed by foreign investors to obtain large quantities of cheap power in the future. One of the biggest is the energy company Eskom in electricity- hungry South Africa. Its chairman, Reuel Khoza, last February presented plans to make the Inga site the world's largest hydropower station, saying the dams could advance Africa's industrialization. The first step would be to divert a channel from the existing reservoir to a new dam, Inga III, with up to nine turbines and an output of 3,500 megawatts. Later, a dam called Grand Inga would be built across the entire Congo River to divert the flow into a dry neighbouring valley. Fifty- two turbines would generate up to 39,000 megawatts, more than twice the production of China's controversial Three Gorges Dam. Many see the plan as Mobutu-style megalomania. Planners do not have electricity for African villagers in mind. About 90 per cent of Africans lack access to the power grid, and new dams will do little to change that. Rather, the electricity is needed to extract and process raw materials, and for other energy-intensive industries. Electricity companies from DRC, Angola, Namibia, Botswana and South Africa have already joined forces to build Inga III. Together, they plan to finance the new dam as well as a transmission line to the southern tip of the continent. Each country is to receive a fifth of the electricity that is generated. While this arrangement solves the DRC's problem of paying for Inga III's construction, it also deprives it of sole control over electricity sales. As a recent editorial in a Congolese newspaper put it: 'The whole world is taking part in Inga, but DRC has all the disadvantages.' Several villages would have to make way for the new dam. Crispin Lumbobob, a consultant hired by SNEL to look into the ecological and social impact of Inga III and Grand Inga, said it was unclear how many people would be affected. He noted that many villages were already half empty because inhabitants had fled the area's aggressive mosquitoes and other insects. Environmental groups like the California-based International Rivers Network warn of dangers posed by the massive hydroelectric project. They say it would threaten the Congo River's flora and fauna and could cause malaria-carrying mosquitoes and other pests to multiply drastically. Fish would not be able to reach their spawning grounds, inundated plants would decompose and release harmful gases, and fertilisation of surrounding soil by mineral-rich river silt would stop. On top of the natural risks is a large man-made one: DRC is among the world's most corrupt countries. © 2006 dpa - Deutsche Presse-Agentur

View blog reactions

If you liked this story please support M&C and Buzz the site on Yahoo.

Latest Headlines in Energy

Talkback

Add your comment (no registration required)

page: 1

b carlsonDec 22nd, 2006 - 15:51:01

Why title this article 'Congo dreams...'? -- based on the evidence presented in the article it clearly sounds like a more truthful (though less marketable) title would be 'African mining companies dream of...'

Report this comment

LorraineDec 26th, 2006 - 22:11:35

I agree with B Carlson.

Furthermore, there is the question of whether Grand Inga would even result in the electrification of those residences in and around it.

The agricultural division of the World Bank has determined that the creation of such large dams does not benefit agricultural development.

And then there is the question of control: what will happen to cities like Kinshasa should an armed group of terrorists decide to take control of the switch?

How will the Congo Basin be affected by this plan? What about the people who would be displaced by this damn? Has an in-depth long term environmental impact study been done? What problems did the Three Gorges Dam in China encounter for which the builders had not planned?

Has anyone actually read the contract that MagEnergy signed with SNEL? I have heard that it is a sweet deal greatly favoring MagEnergy.

Of course, there is also the fact that Moustapha Niasse whom the UN The Secretary-General appointed in 2002 as his Special Envoy to 'help' the Congolese parties reach an all-inclusive agreement on power sharing during the transitional period in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (see http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2002/sga805.doc.htm) was named to the board of directors of MagIndustries, the parent company of MagEnergy in January 2006 see (http://www.magindustries.com/detail.php?id=669)

The repair and development of Inga-Shaba and any expanded hydro-electricity plan should benefit first and foremost the Congolese people of today and tomorrow. Don't let the water and the electricity of the DRC be subverted by greed and profit as its enormous mineral and agricultural wealth has been.

Report this comment

Chaniqua MamansengeDec 27th, 2006 - 12:55:16

Who made the dam?

Report this comment

pat brownMar 28th, 2008 - 12:15:25

The world needs power. We need to drastically reduce CO2 emmissions. There are ca 7 billion people on earth. Something has to give this project offers a chance to massively reduce emmissions in Africa.
There will be negative consequences no doubt, but what are the alternatives for South Africa and other industrialising African countries?
Nuclear Power... More coal power.... Wind power and Solar Power are still very expensive and unreliable and at best could only account for 30% of the total generation without resorting to massive pumped storage projects which are also Environmentally sensitive.
Unfortunately decisions need to be made where there will be losers, but progress will no be stopped unfortunately.. There are just too many people and too few resources.
I believe that the project has to go ahead and that the negative consequences will be short term. Changes in the environment will occur and new eco-systems will form and be beneficial. Such is life we can't be green on everything without civilisation grinding to a halt.

Report this comment

page: 1

Add your comment (no registration required)

Latest from M&C Blogs

Second presidential debate; no 'gamechanger' ? - Global Eye on October 8, 2008 5:01 AM | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBacks (0)

Debate: did McCain do enough? - Global Eye on September 29, 2008 6:46 AM | Permalink | Comments (22) | TrackBacks (1)

Should Sen. John McCain's health records be made public? - Global Eye on September 15, 2008 8:39 AM | Permalink | Comments (50) | TrackBacks (0)

Raindance Film Festival - Estomago - London Calling on October 8, 2008 9:48 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Raindance Film Festival : It's Hard To Be Nice - London Calling on October 8, 2008 9:25 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

London Film Festival - Dean Spanley - London Calling on October 6, 2008 9:38 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Bugatti Veyron 16.4 Grand Sport - The World in Pictures on October 2, 2008 4:15 PM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)

Devotee to Chinese Shrine of Sapam has face pierced - The World in Pictures on October 2, 2008 4:13 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Indian Muslims offer prayers on the occasion of Eid-al-Fitr - The World in Pictures on October 2, 2008 4:11 PM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)

Energy

Congo dreams of world's biggest hydroelectric dam

Energy Features

Latest Headlines in Energy

Talkback

Latest from M&C Blogs

In Monsters and Critics

Corporate

The Fine Print