Washington - The US Air Force made mistakes in evaluating a
Boeing proposal and unfairly awarded the contract for the next
generation of aerial refuellers to the Northrop Grumman and EADS, a
US congressional agency said Wednesday.
The Government Accountability Office's decision was a major
victory for Boeing in its dispute with the Air Force and rivals
Northrop and its European partner EADS over the 35-billion-dollar
contract to build the KC-X.
In upholding Boeing's formal challenge to the deal, the GAO said
the Air Force should hold a new competition for the contract to build
the 179 tankers.
The contract was the first of three that when combined could reach
a value of 100 billion dollars over 30 years.
'Our review of the record led us to conclude that the Air Force
had made a number of significant errors that could have affected the
outcome of what was a close competition between Boeing and Northrop
Grumman,' Michael Golden, a GAO counsel for procurement law, said.
While GAO's rulings are not binding, the finding could embolden
protests from lawmakers who argued the Pentagon should not have
awarded such a vital contract to a European firm amid economic woes
in the United States.
Congress could cut off funding for the programme if the Air Force
does not comply with GAO's recommendations. GAO said the Air Force
overlooked key aspects of the Boeing proposal that could have tilted
the contract in the aerospace giant's direction.
The auditors found Boeing offered to meet more non-mandatory
requirements than Northrop and that the Boeing version could have
come at a cheaper price over the life cycle of the programme.
GAO also found that the Air Force misled Boeing by saying it was
satisfied with a key objective, then later changed that assessment
without informing Boeing.
'We are aware of the report and we will review the findings and
recommendations,' Lieutenant Colonel Mike Paoli, an Air Force
spokesman, said. Paoli said the Air Force will have more to say
about the decision later Wednesday.
The Air Force awarded the contract to Northrop and EADS in
February, sparking outrage in Congress but celebrations in Europe,
where most of the aircraft's components would be built before being
assembled in the United States. The European Aeronautic Defence and
Space Company is the parent firm of Boeing archrival Airbus.
Boeing complained that the Air Force chose the EADS version based
on an Airbus 330 after being told that its 767 met the Air Force
requirement. Boeing said it could have proposed its 777 instead had
it been adequately told of the Air Force's needs. Boeing welcomed
Wednesday's decision.
'We appreciate the professionalism and diligence the GAO showed
in its review of the KC-X acquisition process,' Boeing vice
president for tanker programmes, Mark McGraw, said. 'We look forward
to working with the Air Force on next steps in this critical
procurement for our warfighters.'
Northrop spokesman Randy Belote said that despite the GAO report,
his company was offering the best deal for the Air Force.
'We continue to believe that Northrop Grumman offered the most
modern and capable tanker for our men and women in uniform,' Belote
said.
Reached by Deutsche Presse-Agentur in Paris, EADS CEO
Louis Gallois said: 'Despite our disappointment we must conclude
that the (GAO) announcement was an evaluation of the selection
process and not the value of our offer.'
USA
Your Talkback on this Story