China Airlines plane catches fire at Okinawa airport (3rd Roundup)
Asia-Pacific News
Aug 20, 2007, 10:19 GMT
Older Talkback
page: 1
There have been over 3000+ deaths in the last 5 years with this airline...DONT FLY WITH THEM!!!
First the pet food, then the toys, and now the jets. What next?
China is really on a roll. How abt. a little TQM there Chairman Mao!
So much for taking over the world.
Beltway Greg
China Airlines is based in The Republic of China (Taiwan) not The People's Republic of China (mainland China). Two different countries. The toys, pet food, etc. was made in The People's Republic of China.
Where do you get the 3000+ in 5 years from? According to airsafe.com they have not had a fatal accident since 2002.
Taiwan is twisted, they don't want to be part of China but at the same time they call their airline China Airline...
Adam Air 574, Kenya Airways 507, China 120 what do they have in
common other than B737? Google 'HawksCAFE'.
I don't know what will happen if my grand parents were on board. They are so old they probably can't evacuate within seconds......
CI Flights really put shame on the Taiwanese!! Every 2 years there is something large like this and there is no improvement at all. China Airlines = Shame of Taiwan.
According to Airsafe.com there are about 800 ppl died from China Airlines. Andrea is probably wrong, but here is a link and enjoying counting..
w.airsafe.com/events/airlines/taiwan.htm
I am surprised how one airline can have such a poor safety record over and over... This is unbelivable.
In this age most airlines have such excellent track records. Its much safer to fly that travel by road. But how come this particular airline
is taking the lead even airlines in Africa or South America dont have such a horrible record.
Time for authorties to take a look.
I dont think its fair to comment over diplomatic or political issues over this incident.
Whats fair is to see why this is happening over and over as the previous
comment states.
It should be grounded and a serious evaluation done. Its just too much to take another risk.
While watching planes from an airline lounge on Friday, I was talking to a Chinese man (not sure if he was from mainland or Taiwan) about the aviation industry. We did discuss the CI-120 incident and he had an interesting theory. He suggested that the incident may have been 'created' to cast doubts on the quality of Boeing planes. This would be in retaliation for America's very public criticism of the quality of Chinese products over the last few months.
I told him I would find this hard to believe but it really made me think. I really wouldn't want to live in a world where such incidents are 'created'!
On Aug 20th, 2007 - 18:28:29 Beltway Greg wrote:
Greg -Please be way more careful talking down to other cultures. First of all, irrespective of the various other quality issues in Chinese exports, this accident had little or nothing to do with China or the Taiwanese since the aircraft involved, a Boeing 737, was manufactured in the United States. The issue that caused this accident, recently disclosed, was a stray bolt, possibly F.O.D. (Foreign Object Debris), that punctured a slat-track can residing within the wing's fuel tank, allowing fuel to spill out during the landing phase. Fortunately all survived.
Such accidents typically occur due to incorrect manufacturing practices at airframe manufacturers. Special procedures have been set up to prevent, control and remove any FOD that is accidentally left in the Slat Track Cans during wing assembly, however they may not have been properly followed in this case. Such FOD can also be introduced during routine airframe systems maintenance.
Long story made short: you may have been critical of a problem that was created in the USA, and which lay dormant for several weeks, months or years before the accident actually occurred. A little diplomacy usually goes a long way towards preventing unnecessary conflicts.
Regards -Zoomer
~
I really think that the fatal accident of the Boeiing 737-800 is really consists of 2 major faults i.e. Human factors or the maintenance personnel 0f the airline and the mechanical fault of the left engine as suspected the fuel pipelines maybe not tightened as instructed in the manual as Iam an aviation commercial student in Singapore and this incident is a extremely inportant task to check the aircraft specifications as required to FAA,EASA ICAO & IATA.
page: 1
Similar articles
- Ten climbers dead on mountain in bad weather in northern Japan
- Twelve fishermen missing off southern Japan after boat sinks
- Six injured in Tokyo when building crane falls onto street
- Two dead in crash landing of cargo plane in Japan (Roundup)
- Two dead in crash landing of cargo plane in Japan (3rd Lead)
Latest Headlines in Asia-Pacific
- 1. The heat is on as forest fires rage in Australia
- 2. Gunmen abduct captain, two crewmen of Philippine tugboat
- 3. Diners eat out of toilet bowls at novelty restaurant chain
- 4. Chinese soldiers accused of unfair tactics in Hong Kong race
- 5. German technology cleans up Hanoi turtle's lake (Feature)
News from Other Sites
Your Talkback on this Story