Australia warns against challenge of Hicks' sentence (1st Lead)

Sydney - Any legal challenge to the prison sentence imposed on Australian Guantanamo Bay detainee David Hicks may jeopardize the prisoner transfer deal under which the convicted terrorism supporter would return to Australia to serve the residue of his sentence, Foreign Minister Alexander Downer said Saturday. Hicks, 31, admitted to training with al-Qaeda when he was formally convicted Friday of providing material support for terrorists. 'There's no point in having prisoner-transfer agreements if the Australian courts are just going to change the sentence when people are brought back,' Downer told national broadcaster ABC. 'It will undermine all our prisoner transfer treaties.' Hicks will receive a maximum of seven years in jail under a plea deal agreed at a US military commission at the Guantanamo Bay base on Cuba. The Australian government had secured a commitment from Washington that Hicks would not face the death sentence and could serve any remainder of his sentence back home in Australia. He has spent five years in Guantanamo. A convert to Islam who was captured in Afghanistan in December 2001, Hicks is the first Guantanamo prisoner to have his case brought before the commissions set up to try terror suspects. Years of legal wrangling preceded the trial. Military prosecutors alleged that Hicks attended al-Qaeda training sessions and travelled to Afghanistan from Pakistan after the September 11 attacks, to join the fight against the US-led coalition. They say he was issued a gun and ammunition at Kandahar airport and was ready to go into combat against US troops and their allies. Hicks, whose alleged nicknames included Abu Muslim Australia, would have faced up to 20 years in prison if he had contested the charges and then been convicted. On Sunday the military commission is expected to determine how long Hicks will have to serve in Australia. Guantanamo holds about 385 detainees, including 14 high-level suspects transferred there last year after being held at secret CIA sites abroad. His arraignment last week marked the resumption of tribunals after they were halted in 2004 over lawsuits filed in US courts challenging their legitimacy. The US Supreme Court ruled last summer that the tribunals could not continue unless President George W Bush got explicit authorization from Congress, which lawmakers approved late last year. © 2007 dpa - Deutsche Presse-Agentur

And Also

Look Back at the Worst Celebrity Breakups

Look Back at the Worst Celebrity Breakups - PopEater
Wii still stalling despite Thanksgiving surge - The Tech Herald
Yogi Bear Gets A Ranger Smith - Cinema Blend
About to Pop: Fallbrooke - PopEater
A&E series 'Hoarders' and 'Intervention' premiere Monday, Nov. 30th, preview

Your Talkback on this Story

Latest Headlines in Asia-Pacific

Older Talkback

page: 1

harryMar 31st, 2007 - 00:09:43

'There's no point in having prisoner-transfer agreements if the Australian courts are just going to change the sentence when people are brought back,' Downer told national broadcaster ABC.

I didn't know that Australia had a prisoner transfer agreement with Cuba. They shouldn't be relying on any agreements with the US since the US government has argued that US laws don't apply in Cuba.

Report this comment

Antony LaneMar 31st, 2007 - 00:20:03

What ever David Hicks has supposed to have done (and there is no real proof)should have been brought back to Australia and tried here. It makes the fact of being an Australian Citizen a joke when someone can be held by another country in an offshore facility.

Also the fact the USA changed the charges to suit themselves, still our prime minister is so far up bushes rear end all one can see is the soles of his shoes.

Australia is just another satellite state of the USA.

If the British can get it's people home it says something about the country if we can't or don't want to.

Report this comment

@harryMar 31st, 2007 - 01:08:24

Great point, that'll be line line, when a Labor government issues a pardon to Hicks.

What a world!

Roger

Report this comment

@Antony LaneMar 31st, 2007 - 01:14:22

Well, Australia is a vassal state (at least under Howard).

I can't put a link in here (M&C won't let me), but do a Google on:

'Understanding Empire: Hierarchy, Networks and Clients',

the author is Prof. James Petras, a sociologist.

You'll find Australia's status in there, well explained.

Roger

Report this comment

Giacomo VallazzaMar 31st, 2007 - 02:04:26

I'm a bit confused, did Hicks support the Taliban in Afghanistan with us and the U.S. in their fight against the Russians and the Mujahideen insurgents, or only after 'The Coalition of the Willing' changed sides to support the Mujahideen Freedom Fighters.

Reminds me a bit of 'Catch 22,' where there was always a catch to sanity prevailing!

You wouldn't want to be against the Australian Government, for they could really get nasty and throw away the keys! Being 'with us' has at least allowed this Australian citizen to rot in an overseas prison.

Now we'll soon be able to bring him home, then stone him to death, after a trial by media.

Report this comment

page: 1

Asia-Pacific

Asia-Pacific News

Australia warns against challenge of Hicks' sentence (1st Lead)

And Also

Your Talkback on this Story

Similar articles

Latest Headlines in Asia-Pacific

Older Talkback

From Sites we Like

In Monsters and Critics

Corporate

The Fine Print