Bangkok - Calling Thailand's judicial system a 'mess,' the
Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) on Monday urged the country's
judges to set an example and conduct speedy and fair trials.
The AHRC appealed to the Bangkok South Criminal Court to halt the
case of four Thai men accused of plotting to kill a supreme court
president. The accused have appeared in court 461 times before 91
different judges since proceedings began in 1993.
The case is an example of the urgent need for 'a drastic overhaul
of Thailand's criminal procedures,' said the Hong Kong-based
commission in a statement.
'The failure to bring the trial to a prompt conclusion amounts to
a violation of the defendants' fundamental rights under both national
and international law.'
The accused have staunchly maintained the police set them up and
no material evidence has ever been offered against them. Two of the
four were imprisoned for seven years before receiving bail.
The court, obliged by law to see that trials are 'speedy,
continuous and fair' has grounds and the authority to stop the case,
but declines to do so, according to AHRC.
In Thailand, forced confessions are the preferred route to
convictions and the AHRC described as 'conservative' a
senior justice ministry official's admission last year that 30 per
cent of cases went to court with no evidence.
The military coup last September has stalled tentative reforms
initiated by senior judges, but with no constitution in place, no
reforms could be expected until a return to civilian rule.
In the meantime, the commission called on judges themselves to
ensure that trials are conducted speedily, fairly and continuously.
Thai judge should ensure that evidence exists and if none is
brought forward then judges should promptly dismiss cases.
© 2007 dpa - Deutsche Presse-Agentur 
USA
Your Talkback on this Story