Even suspected hackers won't spoil the Wen-Merkel game
Asia-Pacific Features
By Andreas Landwehr and Ulrich Scharlack Aug 27, 2007, 15:37 GMT
Talkback
Add your comment (no registration required)
page: 1
For the same reasons why the USA isnt supporting Taiwan openly anymore. It just supports it behind the scenes to avoid escalating the issue into a open conflict.
What would happen if China AND ALSO Taiwan hear that European countries and the US support their independence tendency openly.
China would react aggressively as they could never accept this.
Thats for sure and whats much worse : Taiwan could get overconfident that these countries would come to their help in case they declare their independence sponaneously and China tries to occupy them.
They wouldnt help in that case.
This could escalate into world war Nr.3 faster than anyone can imagine.
So the best way to protect Taiwan is just to give China hints that Taiwan *may* have powerful allies if it decides to first-strike against Taiwan.
But its vital never to say something openly and make sure that Taiwan knows that it would not get help from the USA and Europe if it overreact and does something stupid out of the blue.
The rest of the world would not let itself drag into a world war just because Taiwan starts something up on their own.
Indeed you've just described the United State's policy of being intentionally vague concerning cross-Strait relations to a tee - but my point is that you don't see officials in the United States (much less the American president) coming out and using language anything like what Chancellor Merkel used.
As I said, not openly supporting Taiwan is what I take issue with here, the issue is that a Western leader is essentially acting as a mouthpiece for PRC propoganda. Statements like Merkel's are not arrived at through cold pragmatism. On balance there is no net benefit for Germany or any other country in approaching the Taiwan Strait in such a narrow-minded or biased way.
Wow, two bad typos in my last comment:
1. *United States'* not 'United State's'
2. not openly supporting Taiwan is NOT what I take issue with here
Sorry.
page: 1
Latest Headlines in Asia-Pacific
- 1. Death toll rises to 156 after Uighurs riot in China (Extra)
- 2. Uighurs protest in Istanbul against Chinese "brutality"
- 3. China's Hu Jintao meets Italian leaders ahead of G8 summit
- 4. PROFILE: A Uighur "dragon fighter" vilified by China
- 5. Ban calls on Myanmar to hold free elections next year
James FinneganAug 28th, 2007 - 19:52:49
This article says that Chancellor Merkel rejected 'a recognition of Taiwan and back[ed] a policy of Chinese unity.' More specifically, according to the People's Daily Online (a far from trustworthy source to be sure) she 'reiterated her adherence to the one-China policy, adding she would never provide platform [sic] for pro-independence separatist forces in Taiwan.' Ouch. Why is Germany taking such a hard line against Taiwan's democratically elected government?
My criticism is not so much over Chancellor Merkel endorsing the One-China policy -- unfortunately her country is a part of the majority in doing so -- but rather the fact that she seems to have used such caustic and partisan language. Phrases like 'pro-independence separatist forces' are right out of the PRC authoritarian regime's propaganda playbook. Whereas China is undoubtedly a premier trading partner to Germany, China's government also stands by and, as the article relates, does little to prevent the piracy of German intellectual property or hacker attacks against German military and government networks that originate from China. Taiwan on the other hand, is a free and democratic society with a market economy of worldwide influence and a government structure strikingly similar to Germany's own.
Why is Germany, the economic powerhouse of the European Union, so eager to tow the China line? With all due respect Chancellor Merkel, was denken Sie hier?
Report this comment