Americas Features
By Silvia Ayuso Jul 7, 2009, 17:44 GMT
In deeply divided embassy, two faces of Honduras emerge (Feature)
And Also
Similar articles
- Zelaya: US "supports the coup-perpetrating regime"
- Honduras is left without president ahead of poll
- US welcomes Micheletti's temporary step-down in Honduras (Roundup)
- Honduras' de facto leader plans to give up power temporarily
- Zelaya rejects government of national unity in Honduras
Latest Headlines in Americas
- 1. Latin America fails to agree on Honduras
- 2. Summit on a mine-free world opens in Colombia
- 3. Divisions over Honduras threaten Latin American summit
- 4. Honduran president-elect to start reconciliation talks
- 5. International tug-of-war continues on Honduras (News Feature)
Older Talkback
page: 1
Interestingly, the Honduran Constitution of 1982 does provide for loss of citizenship for those who “incite, promote or aid in the continuation or re-election of the President” (article 42):
ARTICULO 42.- La calidad de ciudadano se pierde:
5. Por incitar, promover o apoyar el continuismo o la reelección del Presidente de la República; y,
Further, Article 239 indicates that anyone who has held the office of chief executive cannot be president or vice president and anyone who proposes reform to that prohibition can be barred from holding public office for ten years:
ARTICULO 239.- El ciudadano que haya desempeñado la titularidad del Poder Ejecutivo no podrá ser Presidente o Vicepresidente de la República.
El que quebrante esta disposición o proponga su reforma, así como aquellos que lo apoyen directa o indirectamente, cesarán de inmediato en el desempeño de sus respectivos cargos y quedarán inhabilitados por diez (10) años para el ejercicio de toda función pública.
My educated guess on that provision is that it is aimed move at banning past military dictators from pursuing the office than it is a stricture contra re-election, per se.
Additionally, Article 374 bars any amendments regarding the length of the presidential term (amongst other things:
ARTICULO 374.- No podrán reformarse, en ningún caso, el artículo anterior, el presente artículo, los artículos constitucionales que se refieren a la forma de gobierno, al territorio nacional, al período presidencial, a la prohibición para ser nuevamente Presidente de la República, el ciudadano que lo haya desempeñado bajo cualquier título y el referente a quienes no pueden ser Presidentes de la República por el período subsiguiente.
As such, it is pretty clear why the Supreme Court of Justice ruled against Zelaya’s plebiscite proposal in the first place. It also means that if the vote had been allowed to happen it would have had no legal standing.
My spanish ain't so good. Where's the part that says masked men will roust the president out of bet in the middle of the night and force him into exile?
page: 1






Your Talkback on this Story