Americas

In deeply divided embassy, two faces of Honduras emerge (Feature)

Americas Features

By Silvia Ayuso Jul 7, 2009, 17:44 GMT


Your Talkback on this Story

Note posts made on our older Talkback system will still show below. However, new posts can only be made via the new system (above). We will export the old comments to the new shortly. You can still comment as a guest on the new system but it also allows you to login using various social network and other accounts.

Other features coming soon.

Talkback

page: 1 

brainfoodJul 7th, 2009 - 20:21:45

Interestingly, the Honduran Constitution of 1982 does provide for loss of citizenship for those who “incite, promote or aid in the continuation or re-election of the President” (article 42):
ARTICULO 42.- La calidad de ciudadano se pierde:
5. Por incitar, promover o apoyar el continuismo o la reelección del Presidente de la República; y,
Further, Article 239 indicates that anyone who has held the office of chief executive cannot be president or vice president and anyone who proposes reform to that prohibition can be barred from holding public office for ten years:
ARTICULO 239.- El ciudadano que haya desempeñado la titularidad del Poder Ejecutivo no podrá ser Presidente o Vicepresidente de la República.
El que quebrante esta disposición o proponga su reforma, así como aquellos que lo apoyen directa o indirectamente, cesarán de inmediato en el desempeño de sus respectivos cargos y quedarán inhabilitados por diez (10) años para el ejercicio de toda función pública.
My educated guess on that provision is that it is aimed move at banning past military dictators from pursuing the office than it is a stricture contra re-election, per se.
Additionally, Article 374 bars any amendments regarding the length of the presidential term (amongst other things:
ARTICULO 374.- No podrán reformarse, en ningún caso, el artículo anterior, el presente artículo, los artículos constitucionales que se refieren a la forma de gobierno, al territorio nacional, al período presidencial, a la prohibición para ser nuevamente Presidente de la República, el ciudadano que lo haya desempeñado bajo cualquier título y el referente a quienes no pueden ser Presidentes de la República por el período subsiguiente.
As such, it is pretty clear why the Supreme Court of Justice ruled against Zelaya’s plebiscite proposal in the first place. It also means that if the vote had been allowed to happen it would have had no legal standing.

Report this comment

tarnished_utensilsJul 11th, 2009 - 03:51:01

My spanish ain't so good. Where's the part that says masked men will roust the president out of bet in the middle of the night and force him into exile?

Report this comment

page: 1 

Similar articles

Zelaya rejects government of national unity in Honduras
Honduran de-facto leaders resign to form unity cabinet (2nd Roundup)
Honduran de-facto government resigns (Roundup)
Honduran de-facto government resigns
Honduran Congress consults Supreme Court on deal to end crisis

Latest Headlines in Americas

Bookmark and Share Share

From Sites We Like

Latest PopEater News

Why You're Searching for 'Anya Marina,' 'Steven Tyler,' and 'Brady Smith'
Khloe Kardashian Relives Wedding Day
Joel Madden Walks Out of Interview in Oz
Inside Jessica Lowndes' Moulin Rouge-Themed 21st Birthday Party
The Evolution of Britney and Her Men

Latest Cinema Blend News

Biel Talks A-Team, Original Cast Making Cameos?
Oscar Eye: Predicting The Winners Following Precious's Giant Success
Kenny Chesney Rides A 3D Houseboat Into Theaters
Danny Elfman Out As Wolfman Composer
Is Rachel McAdams A Spider-Man 4 Villain?

Latest Tech Herald News

EA drops 1,500 jobs as Activision trumpets Modern Warfare 2
Modern Warfare to sell 5 million copies in 24 hours
Google pumps its mobile muscle with AdMob acquisition
Media-servers.net hit in massive code injection spree
Facebook stays tough on shady advertising
USA