Movie Review: Spider-Man 3

Movies Reviews

By Scott Rosenberg May 1, 2007, 11:30 GMT

(Caution: Spoiler(s) below)

As the topper of a small film festival and its chief programmer, I watch movies. A LOT of movies: Mostly independent, many foreign and of course Hollywood movies. Some of these movies are good, others very good and some, well no need to say. Kicked back, almost nodding off (movie started an hour and a half late – by the time it started at 9:30 pm, I would generally be home asleep), I watched Spider-Man swing through New York. Suddenly, I thought to myself, “This is what Hollywood is all about!”‘Spider-Man 3’ is a big budget (nearly US$300 million), action and special effects packed marvel (ohh, bad pun) to behold on the big screen. But even more so, Sam Raimi and his older brother Ivan, have spun (I’m really not trying to generate these witticisms) a tight web of interlocking sub plots- each with a strong theme unto itself. First, there is the on-going story of Peter Parker– Spider-Man (Tobey Maguire), who is becoming a bit stuck on himself as his popularity soars across the city.Next is the evolving love story of Parker and his girl friend Mary Jane Watson (Kirsten Dunst) and both Parker’s and MJ’s relationship with their high school chum Harry Osborn (James Franko).Feeding into Peter Parker’s narcissism is the tale of (what I call)an “evil” black blob that fell to Earth in a meteorite and when in contact with people, causes a person’s “dark side” to emerge. And, as in so many stories before – the dark side, once released, is hard to do away with.Of course this blob finds Peter and Spidey soon finds himself enjoying (way too much) his new popularity and fame which begins to threaten his relationship with his friends, more so with MJ who is going through a rough patch of her own.Fourth, there are efforts at revenge, Harry revenging his father’s death which he thinks Parker caused – new character Eddie Brock (Topher Grace), who becomes Spidey’s nemeses “Venom” after coming in contact with the blob - he wants to get back at Parker for making him lose his new job at the Daily Bugle and believing that Parker has stolen his girlfriend. And lastly, another new character Flint Marko (Thomas Haden Church) the “Sandman,” who Spidey learns killed his Uncle Ben.And lastly, tales of love and friendship: Between Peter and MJ, as friends, Peter, Harry and MJ, between Flint Marko and his ill daughter and between Peter and his Aunt May (Rosemary Harris) , who is probably my favorite character.Aunt May is sugar and spice and everything nice. She is there to bring you up when you’re down and give you a dose of reality when your ego begins to run away with you. When revenge overcomes Parker after learning that Marko killed his Uncle and is on the loose, Aunt May’s voice bounces into his head and says to him “Uncle Ben wouldn't want us living with revenge in our hearts, it's like a poison. It can take you over and turn us into something ugly.”Her words of wisdom are messages to be learned by us all As tightly knit as the stories are woven, there are some holes. Why doesn’t Spidey own a cell phone? He has to call MJ on a pay phone in the boarding house he lives in .Ok, so Parker is poor – but he has a job working as a lowly photographer for the Daily Bugle and has some disposable income. His well-off buddy Harry could have even given him one for his birthday or Christmas.And what’s with the overt gestures to American patriotism – reminiscent of the early Superman (George Reeves) movies on TV? (Superman Announcer: Yes, it's Superman, strange visitor from another planet, with powers and abilities far beyond those of mortal men! Superman, who can change the course of mighty rivers, bend steel with his bare hands, and who, disguised as Clark Kent, mild-mannered reporter for a great metropolitan newspaper, fights a never-ending battle for truth, justice and the American way!)When Frank Marko’s character is introduced, it is made clear that he is a good man that has had bad luck in his life. If so, when he becomes Sandman why does he do bad things?Parker figures out how to shed himself of the black blob, but how did he know sound vibrations were the secret weapon? Finally, there are several new characters introduced in the story that are superfluous – plots are thick enough, why introduce the new characters now? For the future of the franchise?But that too is in doubt. Raimi is talking of moving on to ‘The Hobbit.’ Tobey Maguire has let it be known that he is ready to move on. James Franco was just killed off, can he arise from the dead?Sony Pictures prez Amy Pascal, has publicly said there will be a ‘Spider-Man 4.’ It would be a shame to change cast and crew in mid-stream – just as things were getting good, really - really good!Opens wide May 4 everywhere. MPAA: Rated PG-13 for sequences of intense action, violence.

View blog reactions

If you liked this story please support M&C and Buzz the site on Yahoo.

Latest Headlines in Movies

Talkback

Add your comment (no registration required)

page: 1 2 3

double u tfMay 1st, 2007 - 12:24:36

thanks for telling me that james franco dies. i know he's not a main charac ter, but still... uutf.

Report this comment

DCMay 1st, 2007 - 12:26:00

Back in writing school did anyone ever teach you how to review a movie?
Simply telling us what you saw is not a review btw.
I don't need a step by step of what happened on screen. Just give us a honest review of the movie.
maybe you had a word count quota to fill. I don't know but a real review is what I came for.
too bad I didn't see one

better luck next time
Nice to see you enjoyed the free movie. Others have to pay, even more will download.

Report this comment

ScottMay 1st, 2007 - 12:47:02

Ouch! Such 'Venom' so early on. Review was just posted.

To DC: - 'review' - to appraise critically. How critical would you like me to get? I liked the movie and identified strengths and weaknesses.

To double u tf - I am not the first to write that Franco's character dies. It is in many of the articles that talk about the future of the Spider-Man series. Sorry if you read it here first.

But thanks for reading folks. If you'd like to 'flame' me further, I suggest you take it into M&C's Forums.

Report this comment

RyanMay 1st, 2007 - 12:51:47

When your going to reveal something that is not known from the previews make sure to warn people! You just gave a brief overview of the movie and not a review...

Report this comment

ScottMay 1st, 2007 - 14:32:46

Truethbetold - I am available for freelance fortune cookie writing if you happen to know any manufacturers. I understand the biggest factories (bakeries) are in the San Francisco area.

Report this comment

MairaMay 1st, 2007 - 14:44:49

Wow! you guys are so nasty. it's just a freakin' movie. let the guy review it as he wants... you didn't have to read his article. Scott, nice review... I agree w/ you about the character of Aunt May

Report this comment

WTFAHMay 1st, 2007 - 14:58:55

This is the worst review I have ever read!!! what kind of J3rk gives away spoilers!? I hope you loose you weak writing job you looser

Report this comment

Sherman DiddlyMay 1st, 2007 - 15:57:30

I think the Spiderman franchise should have stopped after the first movie. Toby Maguire and Kirsten Dunst (I'm not even going mention Franco) are two of the WORST actors I can think of - I'm still trying to figure out how Dunst keeps getting roles! It's shameful that the 'average' American who buys into this brain-dead 'entertaiment' is keeping the 'sequel industry' alive. Afterall, Jennifer Lopez is still successful - how the hell does that happen??????

You know what would make for REAL entertainment? Someone needs to put a bullet in the skull of your President.

Report this comment

GiancarloMay 1st, 2007 - 15:58:27

WOW!...if you all know how to read, which obviously, you don't, at the beginning of the article it says (IN BOLD! u ignorant...!)...

(Caution: Spoiler(s) below)

Bigger warning then that you can't get. I always thought, you read an article from top to bottom but i guess nowadays everyone has their own style. It was a good review Scott.

Report this comment

vanmanMay 1st, 2007 - 16:01:47

Good review of the movie. It gave a summary of the movie and what he thought what else do you want, comments on lighting or the acting, it's spiderman. Also right at the top of the article it says that there are spoilers below, how much more warning do you need.

Report this comment

page: 1 2 3

Add your comment (no registration required)

Latest from M&C Blogs

Debate: did McCain do enough? - Global Eye on September 29, 2008 6:46 AM | Permalink | Comments (20) | TrackBacks (1)

Should Sen. John McCain's health records be made public? - Global Eye on September 15, 2008 8:39 AM | Permalink | Comments (49) | TrackBacks (0)

Propaganda and the campaign for president - Global Eye on September 9, 2008 7:12 AM | Permalink | Comments (10) | TrackBacks (0)

London Film Festival - Dean Spanley - London Calling on October 6, 2008 9:38 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Raindance Film Festival: Gardens Of The Night - London Calling on October 6, 2008 9:21 AM | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBacks (0)

London Film Festival - IL DIVO Review - London Calling on October 1, 2008 3:46 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Bugatti Veyron 16.4 Grand Sport - The World in Pictures on October 2, 2008 4:15 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Devotee to Chinese Shrine of Sapam has face pierced - The World in Pictures on October 2, 2008 4:13 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Indian Muslims offer prayers on the occasion of Eid-al-Fitr - The World in Pictures on October 2, 2008 4:11 PM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)

Movies

Movie Review: Spider-Man 3

Movies Reviews

Latest Headlines in Movies

Talkback

Latest from M&C Blogs

Spider-Man 3

Related Articles

Similar articles

More about James Franco

More about Kirsten Dunst

More about Sam Raimi

External Links

In Monsters and Critics

Corporate

The Fine Print