indieNYCJan 24th, 2005 - 13:03:31

OH NO!!! She's going commercial! :-( I'll watch this movie just because of her. She's an extremely talented actor.

Report this comment

digbickJan 24th, 2005 - 13:12:48

they could have picked someone better looking

Report this comment

Tonstant WeaderJan 24th, 2005 - 14:15:38

Howard, Hanks, and Tatou: that's serious help for a desperately wretched book.

Report this comment

Yaman KaytazJan 24th, 2005 - 15:18:50

I can't wait for the film, espicially now that I know that Audrey Tautou will be doing Sophie's role!! The book was fantastic! I hope the movie does justice to the book.

Report this comment

woolieJan 24th, 2005 - 17:25:31

Uhm, it is the LOUVRE, not the LOURVE.

Report this comment

NinaFeb 24th, 2005 - 09:42:29

Excuse me, but what the f%&# do you mean by saying that it is a wretched book? can you say why you think that? is it perhaps that you are a small-minded christian weirdo who can't accept the truth when it hits you on the face? For gods sake, do some research, and you will see how much of this fictional novel is actually true.
As for the casting, the only wise choice so far is Jean Reno, everyone else are the worst possible choice.

Report this comment

sandMar 4th, 2005 - 03:46:21

And if you do some research on art history, you will see how much of this story is b***s***. It's not a bad book because it's questionning what the catholic church says, who cares about that; it's a bad book because it's badly written, and because it claims to be based on actual facts so that gullible people believe crap such as 'oh yeah, St John in da Vinci's Last Supper is actually Mary Magdalene, oooh'.

Report this comment