karin ralphSep 26th, 2008 - 06:17:27

i don't think miller was offered the part, that was just hype from her PR's if miller had been offered the part she would have taken it, or maybe her name had been put forward.so many lies have been told by millers Pr's or so called friends.

Report this comment

degzySep 26th, 2008 - 06:31:31

She was never even offered the part, who'd want to watch that thing. I only have to see her face, and she makes me wretch. She has been offered a roll in starbucks? Selling coffee.....

Report this comment

karin ralphSep 26th, 2008 - 10:50:55

did not know very much about Rachel Mcadams, just looked her up on the internet, what a lovely lady and now we know why she got the part and not Miller, a looker and a lady, makes a difference from smoking and swearing Miller

Report this comment

trudySep 26th, 2008 - 11:44:27

Congrats Rachel.

Sienna will never work in Hollywood again. Filmmakers aren't willing to risk money on an actress with her reputation.

Report this comment

sherylSep 26th, 2008 - 11:49:17

Guy Ritchie would have NEVER cast Sienna and then seek to cast Jude. She was NEVER offered the role...more likely she WANTED and went after the role, though. Sienna would not have shied away from any publicity hype that would have surrounded her and Jude being in a film together and the juicy headlines it would have generated, particularly if it took attention away from her current personal life. More likely that JUDE would have ran from it.

Report this comment