Movies

‘Poltergeist’ remake might have a director

Movies News

By Patrick Luce Sep 2, 2008, 11:20 GMT


Steven Spielberg - View Steven Spielberg Pictures - Steven Spielberg News

Click to launch this Steven Spielberg gallery Click to launch this Steven Spielberg gallery Click to launch this Steven Spielberg gallery Click to launch this Steven Spielberg gallery Click to launch this Steven Spielberg gallery

Your Talkback on this Story

Older Talkback

page: 1 

JimSep 2nd, 2008 - 12:34:11

For godsakes, why? This is as bad an idea as the remake of Psycho.

Report this comment

Patrick L.Sep 2nd, 2008 - 13:12:03

I have to agree with you. There is NO reason to remake this film. The first one is still good, and it still holds up.

Report this comment

JohnnyFestivalSep 2nd, 2008 - 13:38:37

Geez, really?

This will be some overdone Hollywood remake, let it be, it was a fun 70's flick.

Please do not waste your time. You guys will lose big money on this 'idea'. Here is a better idea, why not make something original?

Report this comment

BtotheASep 2nd, 2008 - 13:46:52

I agree, what a stupid idea. If you really can't come up with something new, and you feel you must cash in on the 'brand' of a classic, please just don't remake the old movie... update the franchise.

Report this comment

retrogalSep 2nd, 2008 - 14:40:44

I gotta agree with the other posts. To my thinking, better special effects don't necessarily make a better film. What made it so good--and hold up so well was the cast, the director, the location, etc. You can't reproduce that with a bigger budget and more technology.
Oh, and FYI--also what made this film so well-done was inadvertant. It seemed to take on a life of it's own during the filming and continued on even after filming--it's known as the 'Poltergeist Curse'. For instance, the scene in which the little boy was being strangled by the clown and looked so horrified--it was really happening due to a prop malfunction, and the scene with all of the corpses in the pool--well, they were real corpses.
Sooo....part of what made this film what it was cannot ever be duplicated (thankfully!) but it did make for one creepy experience! Let a classic remain a classic.

Report this comment

David CuellarSep 3rd, 2008 - 19:02:27

I think that remaking the movie would be a good idea! The original movie was good , but there could have been better effects. They shouldn't have stopped making the movies after the third movie . If you do remake the movies don't make it dumb , like the remake of ' Willy Wonka .' Overall I really support your idea of making a remake movie .

D .

Report this comment

page: 1 

Similar articles

The remakes continue – duo signed to pen new version of ‘Poltergeist’
DVD Review: Poltergeist: The Legacy – Season 1
Poltergeist: The Legacy Season 1 coming to DVD

Latest Headlines in Movies

From Sites We Like

Latest Tech Herald News

Wikileaks to publish pager messages from 9/11
Kindle firmware update offers PDF support and improved battery life
Google won't remove 'racist' image of Michelle Obama
Limp genitals to benefit from shocking new treatment
Rumour: iPod Touch camera coming in early 2010

Latest from Fark

You know that guy who spent 23 years in a coma but aware of everything going on? Even money says it's a hoax [Followup]
Police searching for the grinch or grinches who crushed a gingerbread town containing 650 gingerbread homes. "The people who did this must be full of gingerbread dust. They will smell a long way." [Sad]
Lovers reportedly have sex in clock tower in broad daylight - of course that's only second hand [Amusing]
Irish turn their annual Christmas lighting ceremony into a drunken riot. Once again [Sad]
Musician appeals for return of stolen tiki. The curse never ends, Greg [Obvious]

Latest Cinema Blend News

The Best View Of The New Freddy Krueger Yet
Straczynski And Sand Update Us On Silver Surfer, Red Star
Victor Crowley Will Return In Hatchet 2
The Decade: Film's 10 Best Music Moments In The Aughts
Penelope Cruz Shines In 3 Posters For Nine
USA