Fin KenameMay 5th, 2007 - 05:37:37

Is this a joke posting? Did whoever wrote the blurb about Spiderman 3 actually 'see' the movie? Osborn's anger drives him to become the Hobgoblin, Peter isn't really interested in a new love and the finale is more about 2 enemies joining forces to defeat 2 more enemies. And I'm not sure H. Osborn ever meets Flint Marko, let alone hires him to fight Spiderman.

fk

Report this comment

1234May 5th, 2007 - 07:10:57

Well, it was ok. A bit too long, the script could have been more tight and the direction was a little weak as well. Not a bad film by any means but not great either. Could have edited out all of the Sandman stuff for another day, expounded more upon the origin and character of Venom, and addressed the issues causing the animosity between the Hobgoblin and Spiderman with a bit more depth and sophistication, thereby leaving a leaner, meaner, and more compelling film, if you will. As is, it is a bit slow and feels as if solid plot and character developement was sacrificed in favor of too many plot lines (or maybe villians) being presented in a more shallow vein. In short, this film probably would have been much better as two movies instead of one.

Report this comment

DavidMay 5th, 2007 - 12:45:30

I agree ... this guy didn't even see the movie. Harry didn't hire anyone. He didn't even see the Sandman until the end.

Report this comment